Mr. Kondoju.Prafg.I 9.!9ry v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 oI the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents, particularly Respondent Nos. 2 to 4, in not deleting'- the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac.3-25 Gts in Sy No. 504/65 situated at Ghanpur (Stn) Village and [vandal, Jangaon District from the prohibited list despite the petitioner,s Application No. 23040050136 dated 17-os-202s and in complete violation of Go l\,4s. No. 279 dated 04-07-2016, which mandates detetion of all undisputed Freedom Fighter assigned lands from the prohibited list under section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, and also in complete violation of the certificate issued by the Respondent No.4 vide Re No. B/1003/2010 dated 07-09-2010 expressly certifying that the land to an extent of Ac. 7-10 Gts in Sy No. 504/5 is an undisputed Freedom Fighter assignment and freely alienable after ten years, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 21 and 300-1, cf the constitution of lndia and consequently direct Respondents particularly lrk s. 2 to 4, to deleting the Petitioner's land admeasuring Ac. 3-25 Gts in sy lJ r. 504/65 situated at Ghanpur (Stn) Village and Mandar, Jangaon District from t r r prohibited list. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in th€ lircumstances stated in thd affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cct rt may be pleased to direct Respondent Nos. 2 ro 4 to consider the petitic r er's Application No. 23040050136 dated 17-os-2025 and delete the petition. s land admeasuring Ac. 3-25 Gts in sy No. 504/65 situated at Ghanpur (Stn) Viilage and Mandar, Jangaon District from the prohibited list. Counsel for the Petitioner: MS pORIKA CHANDANA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI MOHD. HABEEBUDDIN AGP FOR ASSIGNMENT ( R :VENUE) The Court made the following: ORDER I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.36883 of 2o25 Date: O3.L2.2O25 Between: Kondoju Prakash CharY AND ...Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretar5r, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others. ...Respondents ORDER: Heard Ms. Porika Chandana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohd. Habeebuddin, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not deleting the petitioner,s land admeasuring Ac.3-25 guntas in Sy.No.5O4/65, situated at Ghanpur (Stn) Viliage and Manda_I, Jangaon District, from the \ 2 prohibited list, despite the petitioner' Application - No.23040O50136 dated 17.o5.2o25 and in coml) ete violation of G.O.Ms.No.2 79 d.ated 04'O7 '2016, as illegal and ar ritrary'

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader f basing on the written instructions issued by re Tahsildar, submits that the respondent No'4 h r uide No.B / lO33-1 I 2025 dated 1 I '11 '2025 directir to produce relevant documents to establish his 1i rr Assignment, spondent No.4- I issued Memo g the petitioner .le in respect of the suit schedule property for removal of the sairl assigned land from the prohibited list However' submits the sarrle, the respondent authori appropriate orders on the petitioner's aFl 17 .O5.2O25, in accordance r,vith law. Therefore, Ie Government Pleader requested this Court to 1r freedom fighter f the petitioner ies will pass lication dated erned Assistant rss appropriate orders.

4. However, during the course of arguments, earned counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this cor rt that the said Memo dated ll.lL2O25 issued by the respondent No.4-Tahsildar, Ghanpur (Stn) was not served on the petitioner rr rd at that time, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assi11 Lment served a copy of the said memo to the learned counsel for l.l e petitioner. In 3 view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks sufficient time to submit the relevart documents before respondent No.4 and requested this Court to grant sufficient time to the petitioner to submit the relevant documents mentioned in Memo No.B/1O33-l/2025 dated 11.11.2025 to the respondent No.4-Tahsildar for consideration

5. In view of the submissions made on either side, without going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the petitioner to submit the relevant documents for consideration by the respondent No.4-Tahsildar, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and upon such receipt of the same, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four (4) weeks thereafter There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall sta:rd closed //TRUE COPY// SD/. A, SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER \ To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department State of Telangana, , Secretariat building, Hyderabad, T.S.

2. The District Collector, Jangaon District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ghanpur Revenue Di r ;ion, Jangaon District 4. The Tahsildar-cum-Sub-Registrar, Ghanpur Mandal, Ja -rgaon District 5. One CC to MS. PORIKA CHANDANA, Advocate tOFr Cl 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the S I rte of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies DAN GJP Yv 7 \ HIGH COURT DATED:0311212025 \ ORDER WP.No.36883 of 2025 ./1.. ..,,, 'l 6 i:i flt-T .,,,/ I I I I DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ."fl"b \o fr,r,