✦ High Court of India · 04 Dec 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 04 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
04 Dec 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,136 words

PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the ariaavii-ti[J inerewith, the High court may be pteased to issue ." *o", or directiJ^'*tt" p'rticulaiy one in t[.e.11ty3 of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate';;it ;"d,iing *ti' action of the respondents in continuation of the proceedingr i.ru.a by tli respondent No' 3 in Lr' No' Mktg.M2/paooylauciionin"uilz ozi-'zi, iil"O-ir --O-43 OZZ' in imposing a penalty of 2s o/oand not waiving the said penalty in pursuan." of tire memo No' 2809/cs'l- Custom Milling CCSt2o2s, dated'ii-it-2025 and ,,it "flt ng the paddy Rice Scheme for Khariff Mart<eiing Seison 2O2i-26' considering the representation OateO 12'11-2025, it'noining but arbitrary' illegal' null and void and viotative of principles of natura'i i;;ii;;"';d *o vioiative of Articles 14' 19 and 21 of the constitution of lnd]a] Cottt"qu".{ly set aside the proceedings issued by the respondent No. S,';p1,tei il-Ob-ZOil, in SO far it felates tO the -u-nder petitioners are concerned, in Dursrrrrr,_a ar +L^ _ t h e re b v a r ro t th e p" d d v i; j lA NO: 1 OF 202Q ;., J' ; Jfifi x3 r.' ?J1, [",,ffi. "H:]; .:?j?fl ":,-, - t,t -zd z s, '*: petition und.er Section ,u1:tg praying th1l.,n the circumstances stated in 1.91court.n,"v-tu preased to ? ; rff t "et t i,: [ : t,J [, # i, [,; i" ',*t"# oi,r," p"iition, in" d #:l, i:, lt=.,ry:",?ifl'fi n i,?1lrX'I5iliturired zull#S "T lA NO: 2 OF 2025 petition und.er section ,ur the affidavit fired jr rrp# ftgfliying. that.in, thg circumstances stated in "i in" pet*ion, in; ,,:y? c.?rn ,rvJL preased to 3:ffilHJffi ?:i:Jli?:?,:HT#o,irrui# v to the p"iitrnu,, rice m i,,s Counsel for the petitioners: counser for the Respondent No.1,2 & 5: Gp FOR cvrL SU''LTES COUNSEI fOr thE RESPONdENT NO.3 & 4: SRI K. DEVENDF! SC FOR TELANGANA srArE crvrL suppr-rid db.nptnano* The Court made the foltowing: ORDER SRI K. VENUMADHAV IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE FION'I}LI] SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVT DEVI WRI'I'PE TITION No.36 of2025 DATE: 04.12.2025 Betlveen Sai Agro lndustries, Adilabad and another AND The State of Telangana represented by its Principal Secretary to the Consumer Affairs and Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and four others. ..Petitioners Respondents ORDER This writ Petition is tile<i seeking the following reliet "...to issttc an ordcr or direction morc partiailarly onc in the natLtrc r2/' yt,rit of' ntunclamus or any other appropriate v'rit cleclctring the actign o./' the respondents in continuation of the proceeclings isstrccl by tlrc respondent No' 3 in Lr' No' Mktg' M2/Parttty/auction/Rabi/2022-23, dated 3l- 08-2024, in imposing a penalty o/' 25 percent and not v'aiving the said penalty in pursltatrce of the memo No. 2809/CS.LCCS/2025, dated 24-11- 2025 and not allotting the paddy under custom Milling Rice scheme for Khari,ff Marketing season 2025-26, considering the representation datecl t2-l l-2025, is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void ancl violative o.f principles of natural iustice and also 2 TlvlD.l wp_36780_2025 violattve o./'Articles 14. t9 and 2l o/.thc consritut,ion of India. ()onsequentl)' .tct asidc thc proceecrings issucd b.r, rrt,, resporur.tt Ato. 3, clatcd ll-08-2024, in so.far it rt:latc.s ro tlrc p<titioners art: conc'crnt'ct. irt Ttur.strttrtt't, o.f' tht, .seid tn(,nto clcttctl :,1 -l t -202-t. thcrclly allot tlrc padcl.y' ro thct ytctitiottcrs tt.cctrittg ittt:trt as trcu d<tfaultcrs untl lo pas.\...

2. l.earned cour-rscl lor the petitioners subnritted tliat the petitioners-ricc mills have suppried the e,tire cust.rn milled rice within the extcrclccl period and trrererbrc, trrey ca,,.t be treated as defaulters. l.earned counsel for the petitioners subrnitted that in terms of the rncrno dated 24.11.2025, there is no dcfault if 100% cMR rice has bee. derivered by rvay of sa,na lriyv.m. Lcarned counsel for thc petitioners fufthcr subrnitted that the petitioners have made a represetrtatior-r datetl l2.ll.ZO25 lbr allotrnent of paddy under the Custorn Milling Rice (CMR) schcrne for KMS 2025-26 and not to impose the pe,alty of 25o/, and .lso to waive the penalty in pursuance of Memo No.2g09lcs.r-crcs 12025,crated

24.11-2025. Therefore, the petitioners are seeking a clirection to the respondents to consider the said representation.

3. sri K. Devender, learned Standing counsel fbr Terangana State civil Supplies corporation, appearing for respo.dents No.3 3 TMDJ wp_36780__2025 & 4, however, relied upon G.O.Ms.No.17 dated 04.10.2025 and submitted that the case of the petitioners would be considered under the said G.O.

4. Horvever, this Court finds that G.O.Ms.No.l7 was issued on

14.10.2025 whereas the rnerno was issued subsequently on

24.11.2025 by reference to the said G.O. Therefbre, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 12.11.2025 in accordance with memo dated

24.11.2025 and pass appropriale orders thereon within a period of tcn ( l0) days lrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed ot. There shall be no order as to costs

6. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// qg/- P. PONNA KRTSHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR @ SECTION OFFTCER / /I To, -AJi

1. The principar secretary to the consumer Affairs and civir supories Department, The state oi retanga.ng, geiretrrilt Buirdings, Hyderabad. ?. rh e co I I e cto r 1{s ; ri'o a i' bi Jtii"[' Ior-i" 6;t,., 3. The Additionat'Coltb.torinO E - goiporalion-, Roilroad District, RolBi]Slangana 4. ' 5' 6. one cc to SR|-K. VENUMADHAV, Advocate topucr raaid ;; bjltt"b i,ir S u pp I ies co rpo ration, Ad i ra bad suppries Department, civir suppries Bhavan, Iilil.Bf X8f,l[:HG; 33fi8?JX[]:''i?ffiir3:'Ji State Civil Supplies A I I i I $P 5tiFfu t eb ConPonnrl oN-[oP-u cl T.oneCCtoSRlK.DEVENDFE,_qCfoTTELANGANASTATECIVIL 8. Two ccs to Gpidntivrl s'upilris, High court for ilre State of 9. Two CD CoPies Telangana. [OUT] BN / CC roDAY dt HIGH COURT DATED:0411212A25 \ \ I i I I i I i It I I t i: i, I I a I t I I t t l: t. I I ORDER WP.No.36780 of 2025 .. l, ,l-n o O tr 5 ilE[ 2C25 * i1. i * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS J \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments