The High Court · 2025

The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad O/o the Commissioner of Police, 2- 48, Sri Shyam Nagar, Telecom Nagar Extension, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana 500032 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, T9BR+447, Ranga Reddy Nagar, Shamshabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 501218 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Shadnagar Division, Railway Station Road, Shadnagar, Telangana, 50921 6 The Station House Officer, Shadnagar Police Station, Shadnagar Division, Railway Station Road, Shadnagar, Telangana State - 5092'16 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction, highhandedness and illegal action of Respondent Nos.2 to 6 more particularly Respondent No.6 in not initiating any action against those who are trying by illegally entering and encroaching by creating obstacles to Petitioner by causing disturbance rv t r unsocial elements and their henchmen, in building a protection wall (Comp rund Wall) into the Petitioner Agricultural lands in Sy.No.701/Al, admeasuring ) an extent of Ac.O- 11 Guntas (Old Sy.No.701/A1 , admeasuring an extent of I c.1-00 Gts) left out land after Road Widening, situated at Chattanpally Vill:1e of Farooqnagar Mandal, Shadnagar Division, Ranga Reddy District (Erst vhile Mahbubnagar District), Telangana State having acquired the same throur; ta Registered Sale Deed vide Doc.No.1797 of 1986, dated 26-08-1986 having r:gistered before the Office of the Sub Registrar Office at Shadnagar, Farooqr rgar, lvlahbubnagar District inspite of submitting cornplaint dated 17-09-2025 against those anti- social elements and threatening with dire consequences, as, llegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, without following due process of law and ollow guidelines as laid down, apart from being violative of Article 14, 19(1)(a), rt ) and (g), Article-2'l of the Constitution of lndia, and violative of principles of n:1 rral .iustice, thereby consequently to direct the Respondent No.6 to forll with consider the Representation of Petitioner dated 17-09-2025 by providrng )olice Prctection to Petitioner for construction of compound wall to his schedulr d Agriculture lands as stated supra, in accordance with law. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r; in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou 1 direct the Respondent No.6 to forthwith consider the Represe daled 17-09-2025 by providing Police Protection to Petition: compound wall to his Scheduled Agriculture lands in Sy.No.,' to an extent of Ac.O-l 1 Guntas (Old Sy.No.701/A1, adme I Ac.1-00 Gts) left out land after Road Widening, situated at Cr Faroocinagar lvlandal, Shadnagar Division, Ranga Redd l [\rlahbubnagar District), Telangana State, in accordance disposal of the above Writ Petition. cumstances stated may be pleased to rtation of Petitioner for construction of '1lAl, admeasuring ;uring an extent of rttanpally Village of District (Erstwhile ruith law, Pend ing Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOLLU NAGARAJU Counsel forthe Respondents: ASST. GP FOR HOME WRIT PETITION NO: 36696 OF 2025: Between: Sri. Panuganti Anjaiah, S/o Panuganti Venkaiah @ Ver rataiah (late), Aged aboul 72 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o H.No.16-80, G;r rdhi Nagar Colony, Shadnagar, Faroocinagar, Mahaboobnagar, Telangana [i ate - 509216- Being Represented by his GPA Holder Sri. Esunathi Shashid I , C/o E.Krishnaiah, (late) Aged about 46 years, Occ- Business, R/o H.No.1 '7, Hajipalle Village, - Pidikiryal Post, Faroognagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distr r . - 5094 10. T.S., ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 3 4 6 7 o I The_S_tate of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderab;d.-500022.' The Director ceneral of Police, O/o the DGp, Telangana State Opp- Ravindra Bharathi, Lakdi Ka Pool Khairatabad, Hyderabad -500004 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad O/o the Commissioner of police, 2- 48, Sri Shyam^Nagar, Telecom Nagar Extension, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana 500032 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, T}BR+441, Ranga Reddy Nagar, Shamshabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 501218 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Shadnagar Division, Railway Station Road, Shadnagar, Telangana, 509216 The Station House Officer, Shadnagar Police Station, Shadnagar Division, Railway Station Road, Shadnagar, Telangana State - 50921 6 Vemula.Anji^Red^9y, Slo Malla ReddyAged about 78 years, Occ, Agriculture, Y.q |l .Ng?-Zt, Chattanpally-Vittage, Shadnagar tr,4unicipatity, Rang6 Reddy Urstnct, I elangana State-50921 6 Vemula Venkat Reddy, S/o lr/alla Reddy Aged about 75 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o H.No.1-77, Chattanpally Village, Shadnagar [r4unicipality, Ranga Reddy Dlstrict, Telangana State- 5092i6. Ygqqtg. nqqIe4dy, S/o Venkat Reddy Aged about 50 years, Occ- Business, Rl/o H.No.'1.-77, Chattanpally !!llage, Shadnagar Municipatity, ilanga Reddy District, Telangana State- 5092 1 6. 'l0.Vemula Lalithamma, W/o Late Krishna Reddy Aged about 55 years, Occ- Household, R/o H.No.1-78, Chattanpally Villdge, Shadnagar Municipality, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State- 509216.

11.Vemula Malla Reddy, S/o Late Krishna Reddy Aged about 30 years, Fi/o I N.o. 1].8, Chq$anpally, Chatranpalty Viilage, S6adnagar Municipatity, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State- 509216 - '12. Kuntla Mahipal Reddy, S/o Narsimha Reddy Aged about 35 years, Occ- 9y9i.l":q, Fl/o Vijayalaxmi Chicken Center, Beside Bugga Reddy comptex, qd ryH-2, Chattanpally Village, Shadnagar Municipatiiyl Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State- 50921 6. '13 Rajamoni Sathaiah, S/o Jangaiah, Aged about 62 years, Occ- Business, R/o, H.No.11-244, Bhavani Nagar Colony, Chattanpally Viilage, Shadnagar Municipality, Ranga Reddy District, Telangand State- 5092i 6.

14. Rajamoni Narsimlu, S/o Jangaiah, Aged about 53 years, Occ- Business, Rl/o H.No 11-244, Bhavani Nagai colony, Chattanpall y Village, Shadnagar lvlunicipality, Ran a Redd District, Telangana State- 5092 1 6 'l5.Rajamoni Ponnamma, W/o Late Yadaiah, Aged about 52 years, Occ- Agriculture, fiIo H.No,1 '1-247, Bhavani Nagar colony, Chattanpally Village, Shadnagar Municipality, Ranga Reddy Disirict, Tetangana Stdte-'SOSZt"O. 1 6. Challa Sripal Reddy, S/o Anantha Reddy Aged about 36 years, Occ- Agriculture. R/g H No.!1p, Chattanpally ViIage, Shadnagar Municipality, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State- 509216. '1 7. Madduri Ashok Goud, S/o Anjaiah Goud, Aged about z, years, Occ- Business, Rl/o H.No.2-7111 , Veerlapally Village, Nandi-cri ma Mandal, Ranga Reddy District Telangana State - 509228.

18.Gulam Rahmath, S/o Gulam Hyder, Aged about 32 yeir s, Occ- Business, Rl/o H.No.13-12514, Bhagyanagar Colony, Chattanpally Villa ;e, Shadnagar Municipality, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State- a(3216.

19.Gulam Khaled, S/o Gulam Hyder, Aged about 3'1 . Years Occ- Business, R:/o H.No.1 3-125/4, Bhagyanagar Colony, Chattanpally Vill,r ;e, Shadnagar l\,4 unicipa lity, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State- 5C l2'16 . ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnc i r praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the ligh Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly rne in the nature of Writ of [r,4andamus declaring the inaction, highhandedness; and illegal action of Respondent Nos.2 to 6 more particularly Respondent No.3 in not initiating any action nor registering a criminal case against the unofficial llespondent Nos.7 to '1 9, who are illegally encroaching and illegally grabbing the F etitioner Agricultural lands in Sy.No.701/Al, admeasuring to an extent of /\ )-0-1 1 Guntas (Old Sy.No.701/Al, admeasuring an extent of Ac.1-00 Gts) sitir Lted at Chattanpally Village of Farooqnagar Mandal, Shadnagar Division, R: rga Reddy District (Erstwhile Mahbubnagar District), Telangana State ir s cite of submitting complaint dated 17-09-2025, and causing interference wi I unsocial elements and threatened with dire consequences, trying to kill Petition:r and his family, as illegal, arbitrary and u nco nstitutiona l, without following due crocess of law and follow guidelines as laid down under Honorable Supreme O rurt Guidelines in a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Lalitha Kumari /ersus Govt. of U.P apart from being violative of Article 14, 19(1Xa), (d) and ' ), Article-21 of the Constitution of lndia, and violative of principles of natrr al justice, thereby consequently to direct the Respondent No.6 to forthwith regi ter an FIR criminal case under Land Grabbing Act, by enquiring of docurr:nts of Un-Official Respondent Nos.7 to 19 and also after conducting a thoroul h investigation and handover the Agriculture lands to Petitioner by providing Pc I :e aid to Petitioner and his family members and property of my subject land, in zr :ordance with law. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci lumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court .nay.be-pleased 1o ---.-- direct the Respondent No.6 to forthwith register an FIR crimi I rl case under Land Grabbing Act, by enquiring of documents of Un-Official Resp ndent Nos.7 to '19 and also after conducting a thorough investigation and handc ver the Agriculture lands to Petitioner by providing Police aid to Petitioner and I is family members and property of Petitioner subject land, in accordance with law; Pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOLLU NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 6: ASST. GP FOR HOME Coqnsel for the Respondent No.7 to 19: - - - - The Court mide the following: COMMON ORDER TN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE O]] TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHF: TVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.36690 and 3669ri of 2025 Date: O9.L2.2O25 Between: Panuganti Anjaiah, Rep. by his GPA Holder, Esunathi Shashidar. The State of Telar-rgana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department. Secretariat, Hyderabad & five others. COMMON ORDER: ...Petitioner AND ,..Respondents Heard Sri Bollu Nagaraju, learned counsel f,r the petitioner, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Hort c appearing lor the respondents

2. These writ pctitions are filed seeking the follcving prayer: "...declaring the action of respondcnt No.s 2 tc 6 morc particularly ft:spondent No 6 in not initiating a r , action against those u,ho are trying by iilegally enter ng and encroaching by creating obstacles to Petit r ner by causing ciisturbance with unsocial elements r r cl their 2 hcnchmen, in building a protection wall (Compound Wall) into the petitioner,s agricultural lands in Sy.No.701/A1, admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.11 guntas (Old Sy.No.70 1/A1, admeasuring to an extent of Ac.1.00 guntas) left out land after road widening, situated at Chattanpalty Village of Farooqnagar Mandal, Shadnagar Division, Ranga Reddy District (Erstwhile Mahabubnagar District), Telangana State, having acquired the same through a registered sale deed vide Doc.No.1797 of I986, dated 26.O8.tg86, having registered before the Office of the Sub Registrar Ofllce at Shadnagar, Farooqnagar, Mahabubnagar District, in spite of submitting complaint dated 17 .O9 .2025, against those anti-social elements and threatening with dire consequences, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, without following due process of law and follow guidelines as laid down, apart from being violative of Article 1a, t9(t)(a), (d) and (g), Article 2 t ot the Constitution of India, and violative of principles of natural justice, thereby consequently to direct the respondent No.6 to forthi.i,ith consider the representation of petitioner dated 17 .Og.2O2S by providrng police protection to petitioner for construction of compound wall to his scheduled Agriculture lands as stated supra in accordance with law and pass...,,

3. Brief facts stated in these writ petitions, are that petitioner claims to be a lawful owner axd possessor of the agricultural tand admeasuring Ac.0.11 guntas in Sy.No.7O1/A1 (old Survey No.7Ol /A1, admeasuring to arr extent of Ac. l.OO guntas) situated at Chattanpally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Shadnagar Division, Ranga Reddy District (erstwhile Mahabubnagar District), having purchased the sa_rrre through a registered Sale Deed uide Doc.No.1797 of 1986 dated 26-08-19g6 and revenue records including pattadar passbooks and titie deeds stands in the 3 petitioner's name. Petitioner submits that tr is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land since 1986. petitioner previously approached rhe Civil Court by hling C j.No.177 ol 201g arrd obtained an ex parte ad-interim injunction < ated 19. 1 1.201g restraining interference u,ith his possession on t.r: subject land. It is submitted that pursuant to the ea_rlier directio Ls of the Honble High Court in W.P.No.31536 of 2012, an ofli:ia,1 survey was conducted by the Assistant Director of Land Surr ey and Records, and boundary stones u,ere fixed l'ith a sketch mir I confirming the petitioner's iand bourndaries. Despite these docu I ents and Court orders, unofficial respondent Nos.7 to 19 h:r,, , been illegally interfering with the petitioner's land by trespass ng, attempting encroachment, creating forged and fabricated i rcuments, and threatening the petitioner using inliuence. petitior er submitted a written complaint on 17.O9.2025 to respondent I o..6, supported by postal acknou ledgments, seeking registration o' I criminal case and police protection. Hou,ever, no FIR has been registered, nor has any effective action been taken. Aggrieved b_r. the same, the present writ petition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Government pleader for F r me appearing for the respondents has placed a copy of instruct.on issued by Sub-lnspector of Police, Shadnagar police Stati,r r, Cvberabad 4 - Commissionerate and would submit that petitioner had sent a complaint dated 17.09.2025 through post, which was received by the respondent No.6-Station House Officer, Shadnagar police Station, cyberabad commissionerate, on 2T.og.2o2s wherein it is submitted that petitioner is the owner of agricultural land in Sy.No.70 1/A1 admeasuring Ac.O. 1 1 guntas Old Sy.No.701lA1 admeasuring Ac. 1 OO guntas situated at Chattanpally Village of Farooqnagar Mandal, Shadnagar Division, Ranga Reddy District. It is submitted that the culprits are causlng interference with unsocial elements and threatened with dire consequences trying to kill petitioner ard his famiiy and also ,legarly grabbing the said land and requested to provide police protection to construct compound wall. Pursuant to the said complaint, G.D. Entry was made on 27.O9 2O2S and after sending the said complaint through post, the petitioner did not furnish relevant documentary evidence, as such, respondent No.6 sent a notice through post to the petitioner on 09. lO.2O2S and advised the petitioner to send reievant documentary evidence. In spite of that, the petitioner did not furnish the same. However, respondent No. 6_station House Officer, Shadnagar police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate had conducted enquiry and revealed that the above said tand is under civil dispute in o.S.No. rr7 of 2o1g and the civil court granted interim injunction order in favour of the petitioner in 5 :nquiry, the said LA.No.56 1 of 2018 and after finalizing the complaint was closed as ,,Civil in Nature,' o 26.11.2025 and suggested the petitioner to approach the co r:erned Court for redressal and the same has been intimated to the petitioner through post and as such, the said land is und: . civil dispute, n<r poiice protection can be provided on the said iisputed land. A copy of notice dated 09.LO.2O2S. u,hich through registered post to the petitioner has been sr rved to learned counsel for the petitioner along u,ith the copy of r r structions $a s

5. In view of the above submissions, since ttr<. complaint dated 17 .O9.2025 of the petitioner is closed as civil in r i ture, these Writ Petitions are disposed of with a direction to respo- lenr authorities to follow due procedure as contemplated unde - of law lor any further course of action. Needless to state, petit oner may seek appropriate remed-v as available under lau.. Miscellaneous petitions, if an,1,, pending in tl is rvrit petition shall stand closed. No cosrs. //TRUE COPY// SD/.,I :.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSI ;TANT REGISTRAR -.? SECTION OFFICER To, 1 3 The Principal Secre1ary, Home Department, The State o1 -elangana, ur.B.R.Ambedkar. Secretariat. Khairatabad, Hvderabad. ! OOO22. The Director General of Police, O/o the DGp, felangana I tate Opp. Ravindra Bharathi, Lakdi Ka Poot Khairatabad, Hyderabad -SdOOO.+ The Commissioner of Police, Cyberaba6 O/o the Commir; ioner of police, 2_ - 48, Sri Shyam Nagar, Telecom Nagar Extension, Gachib I vli, nyderabad, Telangana 500032 t r

4. The Deputy Commissionerof police, 798R plus 441, Ranga Reddy Nagar, - Shamshabad, Hyderabad. rehngani so"j2iti'" - c r ne Assrstant commissioner of pbrice, shadnaoar Division, Rairway station ^ B,or_a. Shadnagar, rerangana, sb6ii"6 -""""'r' b rhe station House officei, srradnagar porice station, shadnagar Division. _ Rairway Station Road..Shad;as;;, i;Unii"ittt" _ s0e2.l6 7. one cc to SRr BoLLU NAGAHAJu, ffi"iljLlijpucf 3. IW! 3fi%tSr"J, BN /r. BS FoR HorvE, nish e;ilr";i""'5trt" dr reransana. [oUr] HIGH COURT DATED:0911212025 {1 sT;iF>,: :\ OI o C) Iq 1B 11? o* o T * z(\ \7:4,.., COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.36690 & 36696 of 2025 DISPOSING OF BOTH THE WRIT PETIT'IONS WITHOUT COSTS q V