The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Offrcer, P.S EOW, Cyberabad, Cyberabad Police Commissionerate, to enlarge/release the Petitioner/A 2 on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the 72 of 2025, U/ sec. 318(4),316(2), rlw 61(2) of BNS and Sec 5 TSPDFEA,'I 99 on the file of EOW, Cyberabad, Cyberabad Commissionerate Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the [/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Charith Betha, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar Doddla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent and Sri Smt. K Aruna, Counsel for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TET {NGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SI],] lNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.15819 of 2oti ', DATE:24.12.2O25 petitioncr/z r l:rtscd No..2 BETWEEN: l{:rncharla Atchr-tta R:ro And Thc State of 'I'elang:rna, Rep. b1, rts Publir: Proseculor. High Cor-rrt iirr Lhc Stntr: of Telangana at llyde r.ibad Respondt nt i ( )nlPlainart ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under So( I on ,182 of Bharatir.a Nagarik Snraksha Sanhita, 2O23 (for s i ort 'l3NS S') for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, u'ho : lrrayed as accused No..Z in Crime No.72 of 2025 belt,rc Lhc trOW --I a'. 2 SKS,J Crt.P-No.1Sa 19 of 2025 Cyberabad Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, rcgistercd for thc offences punishablc uncler Se ctions 318(a), 31 6(2) read u,ith 61(2) ol BNS.

2. The brief facts ol lhe c:rse arc th:rl a conrplaint lodged on 29.O9.2025 alteging that tl'rc de facto complainant ancl his associates were induced to illvest huge surns ol moncy in real estatc ventures run under the name SIILS Real Estate & Constructions Pvt. Ltd., based on rcprese lltatiolls made by the accused persons. it vvas alleged that (lcspitc reccipt ol large amounts, the accused failed to rcpal' tirc siilme or transfer plots as promised, anci issued chcques u'hich $rere dishonoured.

3. Hcarcl Sri Charith Betha, learned counsel appearlng on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri I-t. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on bchalf of the respondent - State ancl Sri N. Anancl Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri Smt. K. Arun:r, Iearncd counscl appearing on behalf of respondent No 2. 3 SI{S,J Crl P I o.15819 of 2025

4. Learned counscl for the petitioner submi . 3d that 1-he petrtioner r,,.a s f:rlsclv inrplicatcd and that llr: :rlLcgations rlsscntiallv ilfose oLlt of commercieri anrl r:onlractual lliinsactrons. gir,rrrq rise to a purcl], civil disl;rr c :rrrci that [hL'l-c r'.1s no Cislroncst or fraudulent inte r , on at 1,he ini:e ption ol' thc trilnsactions zrnd that t.r -' essenlial inqredienrs of r:hr-'rriinq o;- ci-iminal conspiracy t tlc absent. Hc lurther strbmittcrt that the FIR u.as l<-rdged t:r,arerlly wrth nrala fidc intent ro hrrrass rire petitioner, thzr.t Sc(r i,rn 5 of the TSPDFDA \\,ils not ilttractcd. Thercforc, he prayt I thc CourL to grant pr(i ,1rrc:iL b:ri[ to thc petitioner by I lrrving t]ris OriminaI Petition.

5. C)n thc othcr ir:rn<1, Icarned Additionat Publi . Prosecutor opposcd thc submissions made by the learned ccr nscl for thc pctr[ioner stating that tl]e allegations levelecl rgainst 1-he ;retitioner arc scriorrs in nature. Further, tht: j rr,'cstigation \\.as not yel complctcd. 'l'herefore, at this staE]t , l3ranting ol pre arrest bail 1o lhe pctitioner does not arise Hence, he pralred the Cor'rrt to clismiss the criminal petition .

6. Learned coLllrscl lbr respondent No.2 submi [,:cl that l-he lretitioner rv:ls prirnrl .facie involved in a serioi s economic 4 SRS,J Crl.P.No.15a 19 of 2O2s offence, having induced invesirrrs through false - reprcscr)tati()ns, resulting in loss ol-crorcs oI TLIPCCS, arld lt'rat there lr':rs m;rteriatl eVirlencc crollnectrl)q lrinr to thc acts of chcatinq ancl crimin:rl conspiracv. I{c c'rlrltended that the :rccusccl was :r habitual offcnder u'ith lntrlt iple pending cascs in 1'elatrganir and Andhra Przrdcsh, corltrztly to his claims of having no :rnIeccdents, and thnt ht r,r':,l s abst:ondirlg atld evzrcling l:ru'. He furtl]cr submittcci thilL Lrantlng bail t'o the petitioncr rwruld prejuclice the itlvestigation, as lherc tits a real likclihood of tampcring u'il-h evi<.lcnct', infltrencing witncsscs, and absconding. Therr:fbre, lre pravcd Lhe Court to dismiss the Criminal Petition. 7 In thc light of the submrssiorls ma<le b1' the learrle d counsel on both sides and on a pt:rtis:rl of the material on rccord, i[ pnma facie appears that the complaint discloses inducernent of the de facto complzrin:rtrt rtncl othcr investors to invest large amounts of monel'on thc pr()misc ol allotmellt of plots, The rnaLerial indicate s thai tl'rc petitrottcr rt'as associated u'ith the company and participated in making reprcsentations to the investors, and the arnounts collecLed wcrc ncithcr returned nor \ /erc plots arllottcd. Thc offcnce 5 SKS,J Crl.P I c.l58I9 of2025 allcsed is a st:riorrs cconomic ol'fcnce involving :;r,cral victims trrrrl hrrse lirr;Lnr:ial loss, and thc investigatio;r r still zlt iln i:itrL1, slagt: r', tlrrrring lr-trtlrt'r probe irlo tltc nro .lr' lr-zril ;rnd rolc ol eaclr i,rcr:rrscil. Considt'rinla the scriols rcs:; of tlrc :tllcgations ,rrLd Iire Iikelihood of thc petilionr'- inllucncitrg \\,II NCSSCS 0I h:rurpr:r iirg tlrc investigat jon, this ( :oLrrt is rrot inclinCti to 1t|ilnt llr(- ilrrcst bail to the petiti,r :r, ;rnd -he Crrrtrinrrl [)r'r I ron is li:rlrlc to lrt, rlismissccl

8. Accor-rlirrr:l.t. this Clrirninal Petitiorr is disnrr; r:rl Misc, llirueolrs .i1;plic:rtions, if any pcndirrli sh:Lll stirnd closcd SD/- II CHANDRA SEKHAR t EPUTY REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Distnct , L B.Nagar

1. The Principal J,nior Civil Judge cum I\,4etropolitan Maqr: rate, Ranqa Reddy 2. The Station House Officer, EOW Cyberabad police St: ion, Cyberabad 3 Two CCs to the Publrc prosecutor, High Court for the St, te of Telangana at 4. One CC to Srr Charith Betha, Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to Smt K Aruna, Advocate tOpUCl 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad (OU f) l iI ADK/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:2411212025 ( t J.J i,-) 'ii' 1,. ;i; ,"4 Ic 2ll B 2 U26 or: ,s: irc\ -za .9 * ORDER CRLP.No.15819 of 2O25 DISMISSING THE CRLP @ I a. &t,