The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ, Order or Directicn more particularly one in the nature of Writ of ft/andamus, dec{aring the action of the respondents police particularly respondents 5 and 6 registering multiple FlRs vide FIR No. 2O3\ZO17 dt. 09.3.2017 and Crime No. 4112017 as shown in Custody Report against the petitioner and her company under Sections 406, 42O of IPC in connection with the same subject matter relates to the same incident in respect of same occurrence in connection with first FIR no. 261 12016 dated 26.12.2016 registered by the 4th respondent on the same sections and hence it is nothing but registration of multiple FlRs against the petitioner by the respondents 5 and 6 police knowing fully well and aware of the first FIR it is nothing but in violation of law and procedure and contrary to var/ous judicial pronouncements including reported in 2013 (6) SCC 348 purely abuse of process of law thereby violation of fundamental rights under Article 14, 20 and 21 of Constitution of lndia thereby the registration of multiple FlRs vide FlRs vide FIR No. 20312017 dt. 09.3.2017 and Crime No. 4112017 as shown in Custody Report be :treated as supplementary to the first FIR i.e., FIR No.26112016 and club the same thereby multiple FlRs liable to be quashed l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 18081 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction by directing the respondents 5 & 6 police to transfer the FIR Nos. 20312017 and Crime No. 41 12017 as shown in Custody Report to the 4th respondent police where the First FIR No. 26112016 is pending and club all the FlRs and to conduct common investigation, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. R. SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to6: SRI R. LAJXMIKANTH REDDY, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 7to9:- The Court rnade the following: ORDER I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI ORDER: This Vrit Petition is filed under Afiicl€ 226 of Constitution of India seeking the follo*irg relief/s:- '... Issue a Vrig fuer or Dircction rlorE paaicularlyone in the nanrre of \flrit of lvhndarnus, declaring the action of dre respondents police particularly respon&nts 5 and 6 regist€ring rnultiple FIRs vide FIR No. 203/20L7 dr 09.32017 at:d Gfune No. 4112017 as shown in Gstody Repon against the petitioner and her company un&r Sections 4Q6, 42Q of IPC in connection wfuh the sarne subject matt€r relates to the same incident in respect of sanre occurrerrce in connection with fint FIR no. 26L/20L6 dated 26.1220t6 registered bytt. 4dr respon&nr on the same sections and hence ic is nothing hr registration of muhiple FIRs against the petitioner by the respondents 5 and 6 polio. knowing fully well and aware of the fint FIR it is nothing but in violation of law and procedure and contrary to various iudi.irl pronouncements including reponed in 2013 (6) SCC 348 ptrrely abue of process of law thereby violation of fundamenal righ$ under fudcle 14,20 arfr Zt of Constirution of lndia therebythe registration of nnrhiple FIRS vide FIRs vide FIR No. 203/2017 dt. 09.3.2017 ard Girne No. 4112017 as shown in C-r:stody Repon be treated as supplemenaryto the first EIR i.e., FIR No. 261/2016 and club the same therebymultiple FIRs liable to be quashed and to pass..... ."

2. None appeard on behalf of the petitioner.

3. I have heard lv{r.Rlanrrikanth Reddy learned Assistant Government Pleader for Ftrome appearing for respondent Nos.l to 6.

4. karned Assistant Crovernment Pleader for Home would submit that the contest of the petitioner as to registration of 2 mukiple F.I.Ks. Flowever, dtrring pendencyof the pr€sent petition, Gime No.203 of ZOtl vzhich was numbered as CCNo.1160 of 2017 on the file of )OV Addfuional Chief I\rletrrcpolitan lvlagisuate, Hyderabad, ended in conviction and likewise, Girne No.261 of 20tg which was numbered as CCNo.L344 of ZO1S on the file of II Additional Chief Metropolitan ltlagistrate, Hf,erabad, was ended in settlement between the parties before lokadalat and the offences were compounded on 22.A8.2023. The other Crime No.41 of 20L7 is numbered as CCNo.1 t37 of 20L8 and is pending for uial on the file of the )(IV Additional Chief ltfietropolitan hdagistrate, Nampally, and the nutter is listed on 13.09 .2025; th*, the cause does not subsist for consider:ation.

6. I have pensed the materials on record. The contest of registr:ation of muhiple F.I.R s has been addressed, s two of the crimes have concluded in conviaion and compromise respectively and the other crime is pending for trid. 3 ,/'

7. I&ving regarrd to this developrnent, this C-oun is of the considered view that the contention raised in this petition has a become infrucuous. Accondingly, tfiis petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending rt *'.,shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY/ SD/. A. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. R. SIVA SAI SWARUP, Adttocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court forthe State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies : B tVI GJP Ny i I I I ( t HIGH COURT DATED:09/09/2025 ORDER WP.No.14601 of 2017 {H[- q t" * t C) 0 I JAN t[li s oF. -\ ,,* DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS 6