The High Court · 2025

1. sri Rangam Venkatesh, S/o. sri Rangam Vijay Kumar, Aged 25 years, occ ; Software employee, R/o. H.No. 8-441., 2nd Floor, lndrareddy Allwyn Enclave, lMiyapur, Ranga Reddy District-500049.

2. sri Rangam Bhavitha @ Yenigalla Bhavitha, wo. sri Rangam venkatesh, Aged 19 years, occ House wife, R/o. H.No. 8-441,2nd Floor, lndrareddy Allwyn Enclave, Miaypur, Ranga Reddy District-S00049.

3. sri Rangam Vijay Kumar, s/o. sri Rangam Bhashayakarlu, Aged 53 years, occ private employee, R/o. H.No. 2o-6-2s2t2, Bapuji Nagar, palvoncha Town, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District -5021 1 5.

4. sri Rangam satyavani, wo. sri Rangam Vijay Kumar, Aged 4g years, occ House wife, R/o. H.No. 20-6-2s212. Bapuji Nagar, parvoncha Town, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District -5071 1 S.

5. Parankusharn Balakrishna, s/o. satyanarayana, Aged 35 years, occ Software employee, R/o. Block No. 7, Flat No. 302, sri Nymisa Homes, Mad inaguda Village, Sherl ingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District-500049. 6. Parankusham sravani, w/o. Parankusham Balakrishna, Aged 2g years, occ House wife, R/o. Block No. 7, Flat No. 302,'sri Nymisa Hgrnes, Madinaguda Village, Sherlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District-S00049. AND .....PETITIONERS

1. The state of relangana, Rep. by its Principal secietary, Home Department, Secretariat at Hyderabad.

2. The Sub-.lnspector of Police, Police:Station Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District-

3. The Station House officer, Police Station Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District-

500049. (RR 2and3 C.T. is amended as per Court Order dated 12-10-2017 in WPMP 41904 of 2017

4. Yenigalla subash chandra Bose, s/o. Ramachandra Rao, aged 49 years, Occ Private employee, R/o. Flat No. 411, C Block, Sri Kalki Gardens, Madinaguda, Opp Deepthi Sri Nagar, Tirumalgiri, Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District, State of Telangana.

5. yenigalla Himabindu, Wo. Yenigalla Subash Chandra Boie, Aged 43 years' Occ Hous" *it", nyo. fl"t No. ait, C Block, Sri Kalki Gardens, [Vladinaguda, Opp Oeep,thi S;iNalar, Tirurnalgiri, Miyrprr, Ranga Reddy District, State of Telangana. 6. [Vlandava suresh Babu, s/o. Madnava sri Venkata Gopala Vital Babu Aged 45 years, occ Business, Rl/o. Flat No. 411, c Block, Sri Kalki Gardens, Maiinaguda, Opp Deepthi Sri Nagar, Tirumalgiri, ttliyapur, Ranga Reddy District, State of Telangana. .RESPONDENTS Petition tJnder Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ oftVlandamusl:odeclaretheactionoftheRespondentslto3incallingthe petitioners No. I to 6 from their houses to Police station, Miyapur pertaining to the Hindu Marriage dated- 23-09-2017 performed between the petitioner Nos' 1 and 2 through police men and phone calls interfering in the life and liberty of the petitioners No. 1 to 6, as iilegar, arbitrary, nuil and void and in violations of Articles 19 and 21 of flre constitution of lndia and provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act 1956 and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 3 not to call the petitioners No. 1 to 6 to Police Station, Miyapur pertaining to the Hindu Marriage datecl- 23-A9-2017 performed between the petitioner Nos' 1 and 2 through police nen and phone calls therein interfering in the life and liberty of the petitioners No. 1 to 6 at the instance of respondents No' 4 to 6 illegally' 1 petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the. circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 1 to 3 not to call the petitioners No. 1 to 6 |o Police Station, Miyapur pertairring to the Hindu Marriage dated: 23-09-2017 performed between the petitioner l,los. 1 and 2 through police men and phone calls therein interfering in the life and liberty of the petitioners No. 1 to 6 at the instance of respondents No. 4 to 6 illeg;ally pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI S.MADAN-MOHAN RAO Counsel for thre Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : SRI M.SRINIVAS, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for tl're Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : - ! The Court marle the following ORDER {r&1" . }I#',, ielAi, . . at:ir' j1l: I THT HONOURABLI SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PBIITION No.33267 OF 2O17 ORDER: This Writ Petition is f,rled under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "...to issue writ, order or direction more particrrlarly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 in calling the petitioners No. 1 to 6 from their houses to Police Station, Miyapur pertaining to the Hindu Marriage dated- 23-O9-2OL7 performed between the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 through police men and phone calls interfering in the life and liberty of the petitioners No. L to 6, as illegal, arbitrar5r, null and void and in violations of Articles 19 and 2l of the constitution of India and provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act 1956 and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 3 not to call the petitioners No. 1 to 6 to Police Station, Miyapur pertaining to tl e Hindu Marriage dated- 23-09' 2Ol7 performed between the petitioner Nos. 1 artd 2 through police men and phone calls therein interfering in the life and liberty of tl:e petitioners No. 1 to 6 at the instance of respondents No. 4 to 6 illegally and pass....." \t \

2. Heard Mr.S.Madal Madan Mohan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that subsequent to the filing of this rnirit petition, the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled, as petitioner Nos. I arrd 2 have solemnized their marriage on 23.09.2OL7.In view of the said development, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present petition. 2 4' Lea:ned Assistant Government preader for Home raises no objection to the said submission.

5. Rec.rding the submissions made by both learned counsel, and in vie,w of the amicable settrement between the parties, this \I/rit Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscr:llaneous petitions, pending if any, sha, stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/. M. TANT To SA 1 2 3. Two CCs:o Gp FOR Hyderaba(r. tOUn One CC tc,Sht S.iUn t wo CD Copies SECTION OFFICER HOME, High Court for the DAN MOHAN RAO, Advocate loPucl Telangana at ,fu f / HIGH COURT DATED:09/1 0t2025 &* ORDER WP.No.3326T of 2O1T D ISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. bl/u ' KS