✦ High Court of India · 15 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,500 words

16. Errabe li Srinivas, S/o. Uppalaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ., Business, P./o. H.No. 3-78, Sarwapur, Narsampet, Warangal District

17.Ambati Sanleeva, S/o. Sambaiah, Aged about 42 yearc, Occ Business, R/o. H No. 10-77, Gangaputhra Street, Narsampet, Warangal District lS.Kondarathula Sarangam, S/o. Narsaiah, Aged about 46 years, Occ Business, R/o. H No. 1-607, Gandhi Nagar, Narsampet, Warangal District '19. Edaraboina Sunitha, Wo. Sambaiah, aged about 32 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. H No. 15-23612, Narsampet, Warangal District

20. Doddipati Ailaiah @ Anil, S/o. Saraiah, Aged about 42 years, Occ Business, R/o. H. No. 17-94, Shanthi Nagar, Narsampet, Warangal Diskict

21. Devulelpalli Kattaswamy, S/o. Ramaswamy, Aged about 47 years, Occ Brrsiness, Rl/o. H.No. 17-57, Narsampet, Warangal District

22.Rallabandi Pullaiah, S/o. Narayana, Aged about 65 years, Occ Business, R/o. H. No. 19-205, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, Narsampet, Warangal District ...PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal administration and Urban Development Department, Secretary Hyderabad. 2 3 Narsarpet Nagara Panchayath, Narsampet, Warangal district, represented by its ,)ommissioner. The Commissioner, Nagara Panchayath, Narsampet Warangal District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancr)s stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pteased to ir;sue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the tender notification dated 12.6.2O14 in Roc.No.482iE.112014 issued by the 2nd respondent whereby calling tenders for allotment of shops on lease as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the resolution No. 6/18 dated 2O.O8.2O11 passed by the erstwhile Gram Panchayath allotting the shops in the shopping complex constructed in front of the office of the 2nd respondent n favour of the petitioners and consequently direct the respondents to allot shops in favour of the petitioners in accordance with resolution No. 6/18, dated 20.08.201 1, passed by the erstwhile Gram Panchayath, Narsampet. l.A. NO: 1 OF 20'|4(WPMP. NO: 2084'l OF 2014) Petiti,:n under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavil filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the tender notification dated 12.06.2014 in Roc.No.4B2lE.1l2O14 issued by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition. t.A. NO: 1 0F 2015UVVMP. NO: 3120 bF 2015) Between Narsam pet N agara Panchayath, i',ta rsampet, Warangal d istrict, represented by its Commissioner. I ...PET!TIONEFYR.2 AND

1. Parsha R/o. H. Sampath, S/o. Agaian,l Aged about 39 years, Occ Business, No. 10-'12, Hanuman Temflle, Narsampet, Warangal District 2. Gudi kandula Sanath Kumar, S/o. Ramulu, Aged about 27 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 1-41011-1C, lndira Nagar, Narsampet, Warangal District

3. Ande Srinivas, S/o. Rattaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 1 5-247 I A, Narsampet, Warangal District

4. Mogilicherla Rajanna, S/0. Mallaiah, Aged about 62, _Occ Barbour, Rio. H.No. 11-113, Near Goude Sangam, Narsampet, Warangal District

5. Kolipaka Gopi, S/o. Sambaiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 15-68, Narsampet, Warangal District

6. Vallaji Kumara Swamy, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged About 32 years, Occ Barbour, Rio. H.No. 11-146t1, Sarojini Devi road, Nars-ampet, Warangal District

7. Adepu Vijaya, Wo. Sadanandam, Aged about 38 years, Occ Business, Fl/o. H.No. 16-9711, Narsampet, Warangal District

8. Vallaji Bikshapathi, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged abo.ut 35 years, Occ Barbour, R/o. H.No. 11-7612A, Narsampet, Warangal District

9. Gopu Aruna, W/o. Kamalakar, Aged about 36 years, Occ Business, " Fl/o. H.No. 15-17, Narsampet, Warangal District l0.Mangalagiri Raju, S/0. Saraiah, Aged about 28 years, Occ Business, Fl/o. H. No. 5-52, Khanapur, Warangal District

11. Dasari Ellaiah, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged about 34 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 5-1 48, Khanapur, Warangal District l2.Thallapalli Sathyanarayana, S/o. Sammaiah, Age! About 50 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. H.No. 14-87, Narsampet, Warangal District

13.Dasari Thirupathi, S/o. Narsaiah, Aged about 56 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 17-6811, Narsampet, Warangal District l4.Thadigoppula Sambaiah, S/o. Narsaiah, Aged about 56 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 17-9711, Narsampet, Warangal District l5.Madarapu Sudhakar, S/o. Yakaiah, Aged abogt 30 years,.Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 3-83, Lingagiri, Chennarao pet Mandal, Warangal District l6.Errabelli Srinivas, S/o. Uppalaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ., Business, P./o. H.No.3-78, Sarwapur, Narsampet, Warangal District

17.Ambati Sanjeeva, S/o. Sambaiah, Aged about 42 years,_Occ Business, R/o. H. No. i0-77, Gangaputhra Street, Narsampet, Warangal District lS.Kondacathula-sara-lgary,. S/o. Narsaiah, Aged about 46 years, occ Business, R/o. H No. 1-607, Gandhi Nagar, Narsampet, Warangal Oistrict

19. Edaratroina Sunitha,Wlo. Sambaiah, aged about 32 years, Occ Business, R/o. H. No. 15-23612, Narsampet, Warangal District

20.Doddirrati Ailaiah. @. An!I,.S/o. saraiah, Aged about 42 years, occ Business, R/o. H No. 17-94, Shanthi Nagar, Narsam[et, Warangal bistriit 2l.QevqleRalli Kpjtaswamy,__s_Lo Ramaswamy, Aged about 47 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 1l-Sl, Narsampet, W-arangll District

22.Rallabandi Pullaiah, S/o. Narat/ana, Aged about 65 years, Occ Business, R/o. H. No. 19-205, Sanjay GandhiNagar, Narsampet, Warangal District

23. The Giovernment of relanga.nq, .represented by its principal Secretary, Municipal administration ahd Urban Developm-ent Department, Secidtiry Hyderabad.

24.The c ommissioner, Nagara Panchayath, Narsampet warangal District. . ...RESPON DENT/PETITION E RS ...RESPONDENTS/RESPON DENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Vacate the interim c'rder dated 27-6-2014 in WpMp No. 20g4'1 of 2014 in W.p.No. 167g0 of 2014. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A. PRABHAKAR RAO counsel for the Respondent No.l: Gp FoR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT couqrsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3: sRt N. PRAVEEN KUMAR (sc FoR MC,TELANGANA) The Court nrade the following: ORDER \I HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LA>(MI NARAYANA ALISHETTY TITRIT PETITION No.1678O of 2OL4 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking foliorn ing relief: "To declare the tender notification dated" 12.06.2014 in Roc.No.4S2/81/ 2Ot4 issued by the 2nd respondent wherebg calling tenders fo, allotment of shops on lease, as iltegal and arbitrarg a.nd contrary to the resolution No.6/ lS doted 20.08.2011 passed ba the erstwltile Gram Panchayath allotting tLLe shops in the shopping complex constntcted in front of the petitioners and. consequently, to direct the respondents to allot s/rops in fauoui of the petitioners in accordqnce with resolution No.6/ 1B dated 20.08.2011 passed bg the erstr.uhile Gram Panchayath, Narsampet."

2. Mr. A. Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for Municipal Administration and Urban Development is present.

3. Learned counsel for petitioners would submit that cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. 2 4' I?ecording the above submission, the writ petition is dismisrsed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to Irliscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ASS SD/. M. NAGAMANI REG!STRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3

4. One ()C to Sri A. Prabhakar Rao, Advocate tOpUCl one (lc to sri N. Praveen Kumar(SC FoR MC,TELANGANA) topucl Two ocs to GP for Municipal.Administration Urban Development, High court for thr> State of Telangana,'at Hyderabad tOuil Two OD Copies TJ BM \q' : --r '.- -= ", ,/ HIGH COURT DATED :1510912025 ORDEFI WP.No.16780 of 2014 t ., I ,.t-l \ * THE S 1 6 t:Ig 2{]2[j b L * DISMIS;SING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRU(}TUOUS WITHOUT COSTS ".,%- . I I I I 7 I l

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments