The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstarrces stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direc{ion, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the in action of the 2nd Respondent herein, viz-, not considering and not allowing Petitioners Application / Petition / Representation dated- 25-10-2012 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and infringing and violating and depriving the Petitioner from the enioyment of his fundamental right to life, guaranteed Under Artich 21 of [The] Constitution of lndia, and to direct the 2nd Respondent, to allow the Petitioners Application / Petition / Representation dated- 25-10-2012 and initiate necessary legal actron against the 3rd Respondent and conduct an enquiry, in respect of misrepresentatron and misleading, deception and cheating made by the 3rd Respondent to the 2nd Respondent and its sub- ordinates, officers and staff and got mutated his name in the F in respect of the Petitioners House Property No' 17-5-443, Yztl A.P., duly notifying the same, by giving the Petitioner a wti hearing him for his objection and representation, and remc Tenant Mr. Md. Abdul Khaleel' Son of Late MoM' Abd r Respondent from the Property Tax Record, of G'H'M'C' and J various offences committed by him, and incorporate and 11 name in the Property Tax Record, of G.H.M.C., in respect of t Property No. 17-5-443, Yakutpurah, Hyderabad A'P', accorrl interest of justice 'operty Tax Record, utpurah, Hyderabad ten notice and dulY re the name of his Sattar, i.e., the ri rosecute him for the (ate the Petitioners s above said House rg to the law, in the l.A. NO: 1 OF 201 4(WPMP. NO: 41474 OF 20't4l PetitionUndersectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecinumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma r be pleased to pass an interim Order, directing the 2nd Respondent to immedi tely, dispose of the Petitioner's Application / Petition / Representation dated: :5-10-2012' within a week. in the interest of justice l.A. NO: 1 OF 20 16(WVMP. NO: 1393 oF 2016) Between: tvlD. Abdul Khaleel, S/o Late Mohd Abdul Sattar, Occutr f.to. r z-s-aaa, situated at Near Kali Masjid, Outside Dal Yakutpurah, Hyderabad - 500023 A. P.' ri tion Business, R/o H ),erpurah, ...PETITIONEII 1 The State Of Telangana, Represented by the Principal S nJmrnistration and [jrbah D6velopment' Government cf secreraflat. saifabad. HYDERABAD - 500022' RESPONDENT NO.3 ecretary, MuniciPal felengana. Central 2 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, At Tank buttr Telengand. represented by its Commissioner, Hyderabad ...RESPOND: 3 lr,4ir Asif Ali S/o: lrilir Siddique Ali, Occupation Private 20-4-521 lA, Khilwath, Hyderabad 500002 'lTS/RESPONDENTS :mployee, R/o H No. ...RESPC NDENT/PETITIONER Petitron under Section 151 CPC praying that in the t i the affidavit frled in suppo( of the petition, the High Cott cumstances stated in : may be pleased to vacate petition Order dated O6-11-2!J.14 in WPMP No.41474 of 2014 in WP No-33152 of 2014 in the interest of lustice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD ABOULLAHKHAN (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI G. MADHUSUOHAN RETDY (sc FoR GHMC) Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI R. A ACHUTHANANO The Court made the following: ORDER I t I I i I i i i i i THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYAITT. \ ALISHET.TY WRIT pErTTION No.OBtS2 of 2Ot4 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following rrl ef; "...to rssue a wit, ()rder or Direction more partianlu g one in the nqture of Wnt of Mqndamu' declaring the in (:tion of the respondent No.2 herein, uiz., not considering ano not allowing petitioter's appticatrcn/ petition/ representation dt.2! 1O.2Oj2 as iLlegal, arbrtrary, unconstttutional and. infringing ani uiolating the depiuing lle petittoner from the enjognent of his fun. mental right to life, guareltee undeArtlcle 21 of Tlrc Constitution ,r. Irtdia and to direct the 2".1 respondent to ojlow the Wtitione. : application / represe aten dt.2s. |O.2OI2 and initiate [email protected] tegal notice against tle 3,i respondent and conduct an enquiry, in respect of nisrepresetltQttott and nisleading, d.eception & clteotin, mo.de bg the 3"t respondent to the 2"d respondent and its srtbordit ates, ofrcers attd stalf .utd got mula.ted. his name tn the propertg ax re@rd in respect of the petittoner,s house property No.1Z-S_44., yalatqtura, llyderabari. clutrl nottfying the sane, by gtuing tt petitioner a u)ritteu nott.e and ciulg hearing him for his c tjection and. represeut(rtlotl, rutcl rentoue lhe name of his ter.< nt Md..Abdul Khalecl, s,'o la*, ltloltd.Abcll Scittc,r, i.e. te T respon lent from the propettq t<t.r re()r(l of GHMC & prosecute himfor te uo ious offences contfiltftad lttl Ltrtrt, ctnd tncorporation and. fiultate ;l ? petitioner,s tt(tttle ot tlte l)tlltt<)tti r ta_{ record of GHMC in reSpec. f tlte Subject prol)erttl au onLtttrl to te leLU, in the intere.st ofjustice . ...,"

2. Sri (i. Ma<lh rrsuclhan Reddy, learned StandL.g Counsel for \ respondents I :rncl 2 is present.

3. Whc.n tht' Writ petirion was listed on I E Og.2O25 and 29.08.2025, rhere u,as no representation on )ehalf of the l I i I I I I I I 2 petitioner and as such, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption for dismissal'.

4. Even though the matter is listed, today, under the caption 'for dismissal', none appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the rnatter. 5 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/. A. SRINIVAS REDDY- SISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER I One CC to Sri MoM Abdullahkhan, Advocale top(Lq One CC to SRl. 1194iR A ACHUTHANAND Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration Urban Development, High Court for lhe State of Telang€na,'at Hyderab;J aOUTj One CC to Sri G. Madhusudhan Redd(SC for GHMC) tOpUCl Two CD Copies To, 1 2 3 4 5 TJ M[/T ctlK HIGH COURT DATED:1210912025 i I I 1 I I I I ! i L I ORDER WP.No.33152 ot 2014 '(Hl Sre o o ? I Jr! 2026 t .TC , 7-o ) DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOII NON. PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS o5t*

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstarrces stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direc{ion, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the in action of the 2nd Respondent herein, viz-, not considering and not allowing Petitioners Application / Petition / Representation dated- 25-10-2012 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and infringing and violating and depriving the Petitioner from the enioyment of his fundamental right to life, guaranteed Under Artich 21 of [The] Constitution of lndia, and to direct the 2nd Respondent, to allow the Petitioners Application / Petition / Representation dated- 25-10-2012 and initiate necessary legal actron against the 3rd Respondent and conduct an enquiry, in respect of misrepresentatron and misleading, deception and cheating made by the 3rd Respondent to the 2nd Respondent and its sub- ordinates, officers and staff and got mutated his name in the F in respect of the Petitioners House Property No' 17-5-443, Yztl A.P., duly notifying the same, by giving the Petitioner a wti hearing him for his objection and representation, and remc Tenant Mr. Md. Abdul Khaleel' Son of Late MoM' Abd r Respondent from the Property Tax Record, of G'H'M'C' and J various offences committed by him, and incorporate and 11 name in the Property Tax Record, of G.H.M.C., in respect of t Property No. 17-5-443, Yakutpurah, Hyderabad A'P', accorrl interest of justice 'operty Tax Record, utpurah, Hyderabad ten notice and dulY re the name of his Sattar, i.e., the ri rosecute him for the (ate the Petitioners s above said House rg to the law, in the l.A. NO: 1 OF 201 4(WPMP. NO: 41474 OF 20't4l PetitionUndersectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecinumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma r be pleased to pass an interim Order, directing the 2nd Respondent to immedi tely, dispose of the Petitioner's Application / Petition / Representation dated: :5-10-2012' within a week. in the interest of justice l.A. NO: 1 OF 20 16(WVMP. NO: 1393 oF 2016) Between: tvlD. Abdul Khaleel, S/o Late Mohd Abdul Sattar, Occutr f.to. r z-s-aaa, situated at Near Kali Masjid, Outside Dal Yakutpurah, Hyderabad - 500023 A. P.' ri tion Business, R/o H ),erpurah, ...PETITIONEII 1 The State Of Telangana, Represented by the Principal S nJmrnistration and [jrbah D6velopment' Government cf secreraflat. saifabad. HYDERABAD - 500022' RESPONDENT NO.3 ecretary, MuniciPal felengana. Central 2 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, At Tank buttr Telengand. represented by its Commissioner, Hyderabad ...RESPOND: 3 lr,4ir Asif Ali S/o: lrilir Siddique Ali, Occupation Private 20-4-521 lA, Khilwath, Hyderabad 500002 'lTS/RESPONDENTS :mployee, R/o H No. ...RESPC NDENT/PETITIONER Petitron under Section 151 CPC praying that in the t i the affidavit frled in suppo( of the petition, the High Cott cumstances stated in : may be pleased to vacate petition Order dated O6-11-2!J.14 in WPMP No.41474 of 2014 in WP No-33152 of 2014 in the interest of lustice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD ABOULLAHKHAN (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI G. MADHUSUOHAN RETDY (sc FoR GHMC) Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI R. A ACHUTHANANO The Court made the following: ORDER I t I I i I i i i i i THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYAITT. \ ALISHET.TY WRIT pErTTION No.OBtS2 of 2Ot4 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following rrl ef; "...to rssue a wit, ()rder or Direction more partianlu g one in the nqture of Wnt of Mqndamu' declaring the in (:tion of the respondent No.2 herein, uiz., not considering ano not allowing petitioter's appticatrcn/ petition/ representation dt.2! 1O.2Oj2 as iLlegal, arbrtrary, unconstttutional and. infringing ani uiolating the depiuing lle petittoner from the enjognent of his fun. mental right to life, guareltee undeArtlcle 21 of Tlrc Constitution ,r. Irtdia and to direct the 2".1 respondent to ojlow the Wtitione. : application / represe aten dt.2s. |O.2OI2 and initiate [email protected] tegal notice against tle 3,i respondent and conduct an enquiry, in respect of nisrepresetltQttott and nisleading, d.eception & clteotin, mo.de bg the 3"t respondent to the 2"d respondent and its srtbordit ates, ofrcers attd stalf .utd got mula.ted. his name tn the propertg ax re@rd in respect of the petittoner,s house property No.1Z-S_44., yalatqtura, llyderabari. clutrl nottfying the sane, by gtuing tt petitioner a u)ritteu nott.e and ciulg hearing him for his c tjection and. represeut(rtlotl, rutcl rentoue lhe name of his ter.< nt Md..Abdul Khalecl, s,'o la*, ltloltd.Abcll Scittc,r, i.e. te T respon lent from the propettq t<t.r re()r(l of GHMC & prosecute himfor te uo ious offences contfiltftad lttl Ltrtrt, ctnd tncorporation and. fiultate ;l ? petitioner,s tt(tttle ot tlte l)tlltt<)tti r ta_{ record of GHMC in reSpec. f tlte Subject prol)erttl au onLtttrl to te leLU, in the intere.st ofjustice . ...,"

2. Sri (i. Ma<lh rrsuclhan Reddy, learned StandL.g Counsel for \ respondents I :rncl 2 is present.

3. Whc.n tht' Writ petirion was listed on I E Og.2O25 and 29.08.2025, rhere u,as no representation on )ehalf of the l I i I I I I I I 2 petitioner and as such, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption for dismissal'.

4. Even though the matter is listed, today, under the caption 'for dismissal', none appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the rnatter. 5 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/. A. SRINIVAS REDDY- SISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER I One CC to Sri MoM Abdullahkhan, Advocale top(Lq One CC to SRl. 1194iR A ACHUTHANAND Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration Urban Development, High Court for lhe State of Telang€na,'at Hyderab;J aOUTj One CC to Sri G. Madhusudhan Redd(SC for GHMC) tOpUCl Two CD Copies To, 1 2 3 4 5 TJ M[/T ctlK HIGH COURT DATED:1210912025 i I I 1 I I I I ! i L I ORDER WP.No.33152 ot 2014 '(Hl Sre o o ? I Jr! 2026 t .TC , 7-o ) DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOII NON. PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS o5t*