The High Court · 2025

3. K Sridevi,.D/o Late Koteswara Rao, Wo K Dinesh, Aqed about 39 vears. -' O-cc-u. House hold, R/o Chandur Village, Bodhan Man?al, NizamiUiO _ 503206.

4. G-Sri Latha, D/o Late Koteswara R1o, [/o B Venkata Ramana, Aged about - -- yearq^O.ccuj private Emplo^y^ee. R/o Flat No 34, Tirumala foweis,-tvtJ 16 Colony ECIL, Hyderabad - 500040 5 6 Lakstrmi, D/o Late Venkata Ratnam, W/o P Koteswara Rao, Aged S.mt P about 60 years, Occu: House wife, R/o Makloor Mllage and Mandal, Near - Ramalayam Temple, Nizamabad - 503213. ^J-aya Smt K Suvam_a Kumari, D/o Late Venkata Ratnam, W/o K Mallikarjuna Rao, Aged. about 55 years, Occu: House Wife, R/o Madanapally Village, Makloor Mandal, Nizamabad - 503303. ...Respondents lA NO: 2 OF 2025 ' Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteased to permit the petitioners No. 1 and 2 to be represented by petitioner No.3 in the above CRP in the interest of ,ustice. lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteased to Suspend operation of the order and decree dated 22.07.2025 in CMA No.5 of 2023 passed by senior civil Judge. Armoor confirming the order and decree dated 10.11.2023 in lA No. 74 of 2021 in OS No. 34 of2021 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge. Armoor, Nizambad District pending disposal of the CRP in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Bonthu Rajani Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COIIRT FOR THE STATE OF TELAI{GANA AT ITYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JIJSTICE C.V.BHASI(AR REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4387 of 2025 DATE: O5.12.2O25 Between: G. Ashok Babu and two others. Smt. G. Krishna Kumari and five others. AND ... Petitioners ....Respondents ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners/defendant Nos.l to 3 against the orders dated 22.07.2025 passed in C.M.A.No.S of 2023 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, at Armoor, Nizamabad District.

2. The respondents herein/plaintiffs instituted the suit vide O.S.No.34 of 2021 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Armoor, against the petitioners herein/defendants seeking partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties. Along with the suit, the plaintiffs liled LA.No.74 of 2O2l seeking to grant temporary injunction restraining the defendants not to alienate or enter into any kind- cf, agreement with third parties in respect of schedule 2 ..i properties .A' to 'L', till disposal of the suit. The trial court vide order dated 10.11 .2023 allowed the said I.A, granting temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants by restraining them from alienating the schedule properties in favour of third parties, till the disposal of suit. Aggrieved by the same, defendants filed c.M.A.No.S of 2023 on the file of the learned senior civil Judge at Armoor and the learned Appellate Court, after thorough examination of the documents liled along with the appeal, dismissed the appeal vide order dated 22.07.2025 confirming the orders of the trial court. challenging the same, the present revision is frled by the defendants.

3. Admittedly, the suit is for partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties. It is the case of the petitioners/defendants that the suit schedule properties are self-acquired properties but not joint family properties and as such, the plaintiffs are not entitled for any share in the suit schedule properties.'The issues raised herein can be decided only after full-fledged trial. The Courts below have rightly granted interim order protecting the interest of the parties. There is no illegality or irregularity in the impugned orders passed by the courts below warranting interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3 4- At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners requested that the trial court be directed to dispose of the suit vide o.s.N o-34 of 2O2L within a fixed time frame.

5. In view of the above submission and considering the nature of the dispute, it is appropriate to direct the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously.

6. Accordingly, this civil Revision petition is disposed of directing the learned Principal Junior civil Judge, at Armoor, Nizamabad District, to dispose of the suit in o.s.No.34 of 2o2l preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. \ SD/. U.SUDHA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR 6 I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge. Armoor, Nizamabad District Telangana 2. One CC to SRl. BONTHU RAJANI Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies Sa/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:0511212025 l i ..\. ti.rE s14 cr- ( +J ?) 19 Eic m[ ORDER CRP.No.4387 of 2025 t) .SPat r'tl rr' I DISPOSING OF THE CRP \4/ tY