Krishnakumar v. Shah., S/o Late Vallabhdas B. Shah, R/o

Petition under Article 226 ot the C,onstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction and quash the FIR No.18/2017, dated 01 .O2.2O17 of P.S., Tappachahutra, Hyderabad l.A. NO: 't OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 9325 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant. stay of all further proceedings including appearance and arrest of the Petitioners in FIR No.1 812017 , dated 01 .O2.2017 of P.S., Tappachabutra, Hyderabad City pending drsposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VISHWAJITH REP SRl. PRABHAKAR PERI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2 : SRI B. SRIDHAR, AGP FOR HOME i I I I I l i I I I l l l Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3to6: GP FOR REVENT E The Court made the following: ORDER i "' I \ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREEh TVAS RAO WRITPETITION No.7574 of2017 oRI)ER: This writ petition has been filed seekirrl to quash the proceedings in FIR No.l8 of 2017 on the file ot tr: Tappachabutra Police Station, Hyderabad, wherein the petitioner: were anayed as accused Nos.l to 18, for the offences punishable ur< er Sections 447, 449 rlw 148, 149,427,323 and 506 r/w 120_8 of he Indian penal Code, 1860 and Section 156(3) of the Code of Crrr rinal procedure,

2. Mr.Vishwajith, leamed counsel representing p.prabhakar, ",1r. leamed @unsel for the petitioners is present.

3. Mr.B.Sridhar, leamed Assistant Governm,: rt pleader for Home, basing upon the instructions fumished b,u the concerned officer, submiffed that during the pendency olthis \,\ rit petition, the Investigating Officer, after conducting investigariorr fited the final report. The concerned court took cognizance of tht same, and the case was numbered as C.C.No.99l of 2017, in whict the petitioners were acquifted on 13.02.2023. 2

4. By virtue of the same, the cause in this wdt petition does not survive for adj udication.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, ifany, shall stand closed. SD/- AHMED ABDULLA KHAN AS STANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To, Hyderabad [OUTI

1. One CC to SRl. PRABHAKAR pERt, Advocare tOpUCI 2. Two CCs to Gp FOR HOME ,High Court roiirr<j StatJ'of Telangana at 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE High Court for the State of Telangana, at 4. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] BM PVL CHR I I I I i I I HIGH COURT DATED:1810912025 o i 9 JAN IOzE -k {,-'..1 :, 7- 6) r\_ * ORDER WP.No.7574 o12017 CLOSING THE WRIT PET]TION WITHO UTCOSTS %t-