The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Criminal Proceeding in F.l.R.No,151312024 on the file of P.S. Uppal, Rachakonda District for the alleged offenses under Sections 69, 352, 351 (2) of BNS. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings including the arrest of Petitioner/Accused in F.l.R No. 151312024 on the file of P.S. Uppal, Rachakonda District for alleged offenses under Sections 69, 352, 351 (2) of BNS I 7 l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Between: Garigaboina H No. 3-16-102/1 Venkat Reddy Nagar, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad- 5000.13. D/o Ravinder, Age. 33 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. -[-avanya, ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND 1 2 Nagula Srinivas, S/o Kanakayya, Age. 44 years, Occ. Government Teachbr, llg- H.No 3-16-1021Dt1. Venkat Reddy Nagar, Ramanthapur, Hyderabadi 500013 The State of Telangana, Represented by its public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition under section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to permlt the petitioner to compound the offence in Crime No. '151312024, on the file of P.S. Uppal, Rachakonda District. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2024 Petition under section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromise in the above criminal petition and quash in F.l.R No,151312024 on the file of P.s. Uppal, Rachakonda District, for alleged offenses under Sections 69, 352, 351(2) of BNS. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petilion and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. Mukkera sahithi sri Kavya, Advocate for the petitioner, Additonal public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. and of sri ralari Narasimha, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER _:i=P-7 ,7 '/ HON'BLE, SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVT I.A.N os.3 and4o f 2024 in/and CRTMI NAL PETITION No.16 463 of2024 COMM oNO RDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings against him in F.I.R'No'1513 of 2024 of UppalPolice Station' Rachakonda, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 69, 3 52, 35 l(2) of BNS' I I i I lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the 2. pettttoners as well as the respondent No'2' that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition' the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly' I'A'Nos'3 and 4 of 'l 2024havebeenfiledtorecordthecompromisebetweenthem { I and to comPound the offences'

3. Vide order dated 07'01'2025' this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee' High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad' for identification and to submit a report. j .{ t 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued bt this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 09.01 .2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. In view of the above, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol' 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused t F.I.R.No.15 13 of 2024 of Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda, are hereby quashed I Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. 1l Sd/- MOHD. ISMAIL N T REGISTRAR TA ASSIS -lCTION OFFICER / //TRUE COPY// To, .1. The Vl Additional lr/|etropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, Malkajgiri District' Uppal 'Jiinn"nu" Hvderabad. [OUT] a.ilila'rSllf, :'F,9,lrE?":BBii"?:iiE,.'3:'31'::?'133,:ts3i'f i sl"#H gl:*xs,*xHlg itfJl.? ffiffi"6'" 6. Two CD CoPies " i i;.,;;iti! iipv ot Joint Memo or compromise) w roPUCl VH/gh I \, r HIGH COURT DATED: 22tO1t2O2S COI,IMON ORDER l.A. NO:_J AND 4OF 2024 IN/AND CRLP.No.16463 of 2024 Et.1 1 14 ({o Y o V. * 1 ; Fri ?025 ! C .1., * ALLOW,NG THE CRIMINAL PET,TION 06 )b{ -lDg i HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD r.A.NO IN OF 2024 oF 2024 cRL.P.No. BETWEEN: Garigaboina Lavanya D/o Ravinder, Age: 33 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o: H.No: 3-16-10217, Venkat Reddy Nagar, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad, Telangana. Petitioner/Respondent/ Defacto Complainant AND

1. Nagula Srinivas, S/o Kanal<aiah, Age:. 44 years, Occ: Government Teacher P/o: H.No: 3-16-L02lDll, Venkat Reddy Nagar, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad- 500013. ... RespondenVPetitio ner/Accused

2. The State ofTelangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ... Respondent/Respondent JOINT MEMO 1 It is submitted that the allegation of the complaint is that the de- facto complainant gave a complaint before the P.S. Uppal, Rachakonda District on 26.1,1.2024 and the police registered it as Crime. No. 1513 of 2024 for offences Punishable u/s Section 69, 352, 351(2) BNS and took up the investigation.

2. We submit that with the intervention of the well-wishers and eldels of both the parties, they settled the matter amicably out of the court. That due to the said reasons, the de-facto complainant tame forward to withdraw the complaint for which the accused also executed an Affidavit stating that they are ready to withdraw the above saiil case. After considering all the above circumstances v- this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No. 151312024 on the file of P.S. Uppal, Rachakonda District, otherwise the petltioners and their family members will suffer irreparable loss. 3 That in view of the settlement reached between, us no purpose will be served as the Crime. No. 1513 of 2024, Dated 26-ll-2024, on the file P.S. Uppal, Rachakonda District, is continued further. 4 5 That the continuation of the criminal proceedings is coming in their way of living of peaceful liFe. That the complainant has no objection for proceeding to close the matter.

6. Both the paties have agreed not to file cases against each other That Petitioner and De-facto Complainant respectfully submit that, the above matter is settled out of the Court and that this Hon'ble Couft may be pleased to Quash Crime No. l5l3/2}24 on the file oF P.S. Uppal, Rachakonda District, by compounding the offense in terms of compromise in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances oF the case. Hence, this loint Memo. HYDERABAD DATE:31-12-2024 &"J Respondent/De-facto Complainant ( Q.uavrryr I \ Counsel for Respondent ,,L. ,t) t- \, f- rJ PetitioneriAccused / xr, 5."iniv$) Counsel for' e ti o I i I