The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana State, Hyderabad. ...Respondent

2. Chinthalakuntla Prabhavathi, S/o Karunakar Reddy, Age: 38 years, Occ: Laborer, R/o. Battugudem Village and Peddavoora lvlandal, Nalgonda District ...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings in Charge Sheet vide C.C.No.507 of 2022 on the Judicial First Class lt/lagistrate, at Nidamanoor- l.A. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C (Section 528 of BNSS) praying that in the circumstances stated in the N/emorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further Proceedings in Charge Sheet vide C.C.No.507 of 2022 on the Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Nidamanoor pending disposal of the main petition. I.A. NO: 3 OF 2024 Between: Chinthalakuntla Prabhavathi, S/o Karunakar Reddy, Age: 38 years, Occ: Laborer, R/o. Battugudem Village and Peddavoora Mandal, Nalgonda District. ...Petitioner/De-facto Complainanu2"d respondent AND The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, liigh Court of Telangana State, Hyderabad. lvlanam Srrnivasa Rao, S/o Lava Raju, Age:40 years, Occ: private Employee, R/o H.No.78, Yendamuri Layout, Gajularamarari-r, Rangra Reddy District. ' ...RespondenURespondent 2 ... Petitioner/Accused Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petitior, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner and respondent No.2 who is the defacto- complainant to compound the offence and to allow the above crl.p, against the charge Sheet vide c.c.No.507 of 2022 on the Judicial First class lrrlagistrate, at Nidamanoor, for the offences U/Sec.304(4), 337 lpC. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2024 Petition under sectron 528 of BNSS praying that n the crrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromise and compound the offence ii c.c.tto.soz of 2022 on the Judicial First class l\Iagistrate, at Nidamaroor, for the offences U/Sec 304(4), 337 tPC. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the l\Iemorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.l and of Mr. A. Suhas chary, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.16459 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is hled under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.507 of 2022 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate at Nidamanoor, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304.4 and337 ofIPC.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise hetween them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 07.01.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State ofTelangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report. 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issur:d by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, FlLigh Court Legal Services Cornmittee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 09.01 .2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. In view of the above, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2,024 ate allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accusecl in C'Cl.No'507 of 2022 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate at Nidamanoor, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand crosed' ,,TRUEcoPY'r ^"i3io'*f*3't+RtR / fit't- --,- sHcrtotr oFFlcER To,

1. 2. 3. 4 E b ili,,:i["ili[:f,i]:"H':1]i*"tiF#3:s'st'i;t?i?3i'1i?i:r1" il#tll:' il,' I tiu : ll'*; : a1:"":il''!T't' Two CD CoPies (Along with a Copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) Kam/gh Yt- HIGH COURT DATED:2310112025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024 in/and CRLP.No.16459 of 2024 +ij:'a=: 9-!A1- F r. )l ( E i) r) 11 ttB Tir * j' i I)l BOTH l.As AND CRIMINAL PETITION ARE ALLOWED q "84w,.- -e\ile' 2l (Memorandum of Criminal Petition (U/Sec.s28 of BNSSAct) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT:: HYDERABAD 11' -- crt.P No. I b q\ 1 or 2024 Against S.C.No.B25 of 2023 on the file of the IV Addl' MetroPolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally Betlveen: Manam Srinivasa Rao, S/o Lava Raju, aged about 40 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o H.No.78, Yendamuri Layout, Gajularamaram, Ranga Reddy District. ..... Petitioner/Accused

1. The State'of Telangana, And Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court ofTelangana State, Hyderabad. 2 Chinthalakuntla Prabhavathi, S/o Karunakar Reddy, aged about 38 Years, Occ: Labourer, R7o. Battugudem Village and PediJavoora Mandal, Nalgonda District. Respondent ....Respondent/ De-facto ComPlainant' e ]OINT M EMO FIL ED BY TH E BOTH PARTIES mbere maft rwass ttled ond nta r Com ound he offence U oora Police tatio com romrs ecs,3 4 A 3 T tPc utofc rt o The laint 2nd Res fth Ped e n the le it the it is etition r Ac ra ed that his Hon'ble c ound the Cha rqe Sheet vide C.C.No.507of2 at Nida anoo 022 for eo nces Res 2" e co Dromise an comp on he lu icial First Class M a tstr U/Se c.304 (A),337 IPC in view of Com oromise. Hyderabad Date: .L2.2024 Petitioner: Counsel for the Petit ner Respondent: CU , cIrC"<g Counsel For the Res