✦ High Court of India · 24 Dec 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Dec 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,373 words

2. Sri Pippiri Uma Shaker, S/o.P, Pandurangam, Age: 61 years, Occ: Retd. Employee R/o.E2, Swetha Enclave, Sri Laxminagar Colony V-Guard Building Lane, Mansoorabad L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad. ...Respondent ...RespondenUDefacto€omplainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused No.1 in C.C.No.2827 ol 2021 on the file of V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 ot BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memotandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further Proceedings including appearance of the Petitioner/Accused No.1 in C.C.No.2827 ol 2O21 on the file of V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Gyberabad at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition. I.A. NOS: 3 and 4 0F 2025 Between: Sri Pippiri lkna Shaker, S/o.p. pandurangarn, Age: 61 years, Occ: Retd. Employee R/o.E2, swetha Encrave, Sri Laiminagai cotony v-Guard Buirding Lane, Mansoorabad L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.2/defacto complainant D 1, The State of Telangana, Through S.H.O, P.S. Saroornagar Rep. by its Public Prosec,utor, High Court at Hyderabad, Hyderabad.

2. Bavgi Saiprasad, S/o.Bavgi Ramesh, Age: 35 years, Occ: BIM Manager Presently staying at 42O4,.Latimer Ave San Jose, California, 95130; USA Rep. by his GPA Holder Murki Sampath Kumar S/o.M.Chandramouli, Age: 35 years;. Occ: Pvt. Employee, R/o.H.No.4-7-533l534 Esamiya Bazar, Hyderabad 500 027. ...RespondenflPetitioner/Accused No.1 Petltion under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstaRces stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crirninal Petition, the High Court r.nay be pleased to pennit compound the offences and to record the same in C.C.No.2827 ot 2021 on the file of V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at l-.B.Nagar to secure the ends of jrrstice. PRAYER IN ! Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased, to quash the Criminal Proceedings in C.C.No.2827 of 2O21 on the file of V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar now the lll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar by recording ther compromise to secure the ends of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crirninal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. C. Hari Preeth, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the.Respondent No.1 and of Mr. Padma Rao Lakkaraju, l\dvocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT TOR THE STATE OF TEI'AIIGAI{A AT TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J' SREENTVAS RAO HYDERABAD 4 AND . ...Petitioner/ Accused No' 1 BetweeP : Bavgr SaiPrasad The State of Telan sarraa' qtgX*t*t#ttt; P.S.Saroorrragar'"Pi""tttted Prosecuto,, Hish';;;t;; Hydtrabad' and b.: another ResPondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings filed bY tkre Petitioner/accused in C-C. No'2827 of 2O2L on the Cyberabad at fileoftheVAdditionalMetropolitanMagistrate, L.B.Nagar.

2.HeardMr.C.HariPreet}r,learnedcounselforthepetitioner, c '2 arrd Mr.Padma Rao l'akkaraju' learned counsel for respondent Nr Mr.Jithend,er Rao Veeramalla, learned Aclditional Public Prosecutor' appearing on behalf of respondent No'L-Sta-te' ) ) 2

3. Learned counsel fo,. +,^ _ .Vr , LIIC FrFfif;^_ e rIi eY- or:the rrJil, -{ffifr ffi:::;: H-_.; wishers' relatives a'd elders, the parties have settred the disputes pending between thern and entered,into compromise and filed,.Joint parties have ,red r.A.Nos.s and 4 or 2o2s -ornPou.d the offences and to record the :;";, ff:::,:. cornpromise respe"o*r, 4. Thisr directed tl.re parties i.e., *. ..rr_r:_^* before the ;,"^ :^*., :. Court uid.e orders, dated 27. . "-'".2o2s and 19.r2.2o2s, petitioner and respondenr No.2, ro appear FIigh Court Legal Senrices Committee, Hyderabad. In compliance of the said orders, the secretary, High court IregaI Services Committe€, has submitted repor:ts, dated 04.12.2C25 and 22'12'2025' stating that the petitioner and respondent No.2 were duly identified with copies of their Aadhar cards. It is further stated that ttre parries have willfuily and without _ ^qrv,{L any coercion entered into :, compromise. ""r'::.*::*

5. In view of the said report and also in view of the comlzronrise entered between the petitioner and respondent No.2 as we* as t,.e subrnissions rnade by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2o2s are al'lowed. rconsequently, the proceedings in c.c- No.2827 or 2o2t On the file of the V Add.itional Metropolitan Magistra.te, Cyberzz-bad at L.B.Nagar, ar'3 hereby quashed against the netitio-ge-r +l^a nofrtrnfrCl- ^-^:-^c -l t 3

6. the Criminal Petition is allowed, subject te payrn€nt of costs of Rs.1O,OOO/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the High Court kgal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs.S,OOO/- {Rupegs five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates, Association, : Hyderabad, by the petitioner, on or before O9.OL.2O26. Miscell,aneous applications, pending if any, shall Stand closed. Sd,- P.C.. SUI-EKHA DEVI 6 //TRUE COPY'/ To,

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6. The V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar The Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Saroomagar. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State -6-f Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to Mr. C. Hari Preeth, Advocate IOPUCI Two CD Copies ,. j . , : . r- . (Along with a Copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) Total Arnount of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Mr. C. Hari Preeth, counser for the petitioner as directed by the Hon'bre court vide order datd 24-12'2025 as Rs- 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the High court Legal services committee, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,ooo/- ( Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High court Advocates' Association, Hyderabad and fired Memo as proof of compliance USR No.4036 of 2}26dated 09{1_2026. kam /PSL { HIGH COURr DATED :24t12t2A2,5 cotu[floN oRDER !,A.Nos.3 an d 4 of 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.IS6S0 of 2025 ALLOWING IIOTH t.As AND CRIMINAL PETITION JKS 2L-el,E' t

11., Oft nces' U/s;.498-A, 406, 506, 504lPC invqstigation, filed the oharge sheet AB for the magistrate qs taken the cognizance_ for" alreCdy filed crl.P, No. .... .., . against him in Hon'ble lll Adtlitional Judicial Nagar and the same is pending.

2., . It is submitted that pending Joint Memo at wishers of both families;who adviced also the Quash Petitioner to withdraw against the quash petitioner in view of DP Ad againsf .fhe Second party No.1740 . ',.,.1 ,,21!d U_ma Shekar, 3and4of WPS Saroor Nagar c t'. i 4 li'' in lttg .! ,j i: g. 'The Partt'es farnilies' shall ,initiate persgnal and mutuat caven'ant of herebY agree that neither they nor any memtber of their respective any further legal proc'eedings againsf each other in anY AltParties cammitto maintaining a m pl ete' n o n -inbrtera fi ca in eaclt oither's lives following the ftnntiziation of these proceedings' This restraint extends to and is binding brference and titigation M non-in,r uwn al! --.:-!!'::='':u>--- - @venant'to ::::. j :: L.B. Nagaf before this Hon'ble Court. Therefore, this in the intqrest of justice by allowing the above quash petition' in view of the above-mentioned neasons and the oompromise entered between 4. ,the parties to this joint memo,'both the parties would cooperate for the closure of the , abovementioned ffise in'C.C.irlo.282V of 2O21 pending on the nll of Hon'ble lll Additionar Judiciar Magistrate of First crass, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar' w ': j' ':lt is therefore prayed' that' this Hon'ble r to'iecord the teims:of qompromise in Crl.P in the interest of justice;' Place: Hyderabad fetitiorer No.1 , _1 .: ..:: Counsel for the Quash Petitioner/Accused No.1 t_ - !'.1

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments