High Court · 2025

Petition Under Se ction i 51 CpC praying that in the circurtstal(ies stated in the affidavit filed irr sLrpport of the petition, the High court ma,z be preased to suspend the oper.tion and effect of the order dated .1 1.11.2c24 passed in LA.No.2 of 2024 in W p.No..l696. of 2024 and batch so as to ,rrrable the appellate authority 10 acijudicate the appears fired by the petitione-s hr:,r,;in u.6.. SgCtiOn 24 Of the l-elantJana Abolition of lnams Act, 1955, pendins (lisposal or the wrrt aPPeal RtlHLPi{[l,,:y[li^i$il''i''i$'HS'tRAMANA'sE\rro*couNSEL : SRI AVINASH DESAI' SENIOR COUNSEL R:H;"ill,"{,5;iiiilBi[X;','' Counsel for Respondent Nos'4 to 8 : G'P FOR REVENUE w.A. NO: 85 0F 2025 Writ APP Dated 11 :il;si;lf lil';".Ji,:J,$:,!sH':""f, 5i[:i"'lJt[f s:[ st The Order rt. ""T"*f,j?i:*s*:f,Iii*H[#:x"',i'##s'$'1s:$"'J'f ii"#sJ]'$:3?; *'?=H*H ' #*iili{fil{f"', ilH; ia* 9"'""t ' vr*':rlliEt#hli*; H};i$ffiffi fi1 ^E j'il,,juffi ;itid #:t:: T- ,ffi ,;*-Hf +;sTti,B""fl f '*xl*?'o''3"4'Yl', fulanor APartments' "'ls::"': "i'?'i'* ';*;[s:;$irrry5l,*#E:rT['T'?lilnY"o*T#'11""":'i'Yi: ';;gi"3i#i5*-qf SliH'Ri":s':".1#i{"5:tT''$%"'#3#ifi j:+1.q1*!*53d:ll"d'"1'-:g'3i:H'10*l?Til'ffi:Yf'fi :3i 'U:** .i#1,).11'J;iH::*i[ii;..:*xre"s#",'#?.;;31'6#B"5i1l No-41 . VasPart uc Housewife, l-Vo' ,5::::T::ffi ::'q"i:qql"tB:i,Lf nEfl ,.:lil;HJJtril,ff ,;:i;;p]iirrs;',ffi s:rd3&#RH15: &?"8',,u1li'l';.,o'ftT"1'il""1 R/o. H.No'6-43, 'rtilJO"f''f -fr/l'txuigiri District' ,,'H,?nn11i#eg1tl:,;?*,ffii?[:'fl '81",',33,h331i3335],""1?3ti: ivr"Jo.n"t -M"lkajgiri Dist'i"t' .....A''ELLANTS AND

1. P.V.A. Subba Raiu, S/r ss['#d;:',"rLh+:Ji##?;5n$tl;i,%f,H:,it?{:;1'tu??in,,,,,

2. The St:rte of Telanqanz secretarjrrt, fly"i;rr'#i:' rep' by its Principal secretary, Revrinue Department,

3. The Co,ler;tor, Medchal _ Malkajgiri Diskict. 4. The Adrliti:n:rl Collector, Medchal _Malkajgiri District. 5' TherRevenue Divisional officer, Keesara Division, Medchal -1,/;rlkajgiri 6. The Tahsildar Shamirpet Mandal, Medchal _Malkajgiri Districl. t.A. NO:3 oF 20 25 ...ltt:SPONDENTS petition Unde . S( in s 15i CpC praying that in the ci.cumstances stated of the petition, the High ccurt mai, rre preased to in the affidavit ,iled suspend the o cerat on "oon , A No 2 or 20,,4, - ffi ;x;:: "i,'T,;,.1;o;:::n,1" :.,:."ffi.,"".,;: appellate authorit!'to adiudicate the appeals filed by the petitirne*; herein under Section 24 of t.e Te angana Abolition of lnams Act, 1955. pr)ndirg disposal of the writ appeal. 9:lf_"1 for Appetrants : sRt VEDULA VENKATA R REPRESENTS riltr. eitAReowAJ ASSoctATEs AMANA, sE:NlcR couNSEL f:H[.#,l"J"T;liigi,x,,JIT.1 to 3 : sRr AVTNASH DESAI, sENroFr r]ouNsEL Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 6 : G.p FOR REVENUE W.A.NO :86 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause ,? 11t11t2o24 in W.p No , r)08r or zoZ+. on ii" r,r. .iiilI,H,nh Cou.r. Between: "ill: Letters patent preferred against thr, ,)rder dated 1 fq{ilp./ay9s;ree, t)/o. D. Sudhindra Babu, aged about 61 years, Fitr. H.No.15- 1-091/1 , Plot fJo. lB, R.R. Re^si{ency, noaO' llo.O,- fr,iangapL ram Ootony, Otd Alwal, Secundr:abad - 500 010. Occ - .House wife. ' *.ffi *i:: ' $Hi;to{.iiilifi:i-:Hll ;,iilil tff{ffi3*l$' ' ['*##-+l"ri****mn i*ifl [ffl"::[1*:':T :* ^Hi!-t$iffi!;u*t*;;ima:'*''#""'tilr'1bi,"i*'Yi ::l''fr r?:"on:i; "#,ii##,tff H;z#.';"'*qr**ili#:'ft 'f;;''friffiitr;qg*;,t,3"'3*,:#ft "5:t1h$n;o*3i?ri'o13 '#diiii"l.B:"j,"i;,#rr*s:=,',"ir't."fl,lr:H'y'a:'."*11*: 'ghl*tiffi ;fl-;;m+"-tft".g;-#ffi":?"l;3r"*Pt"5lrl '::#,ri"ill*i.I#*r-***rlt':',tl*'P'*'nr'11rtit; ,.al.l;6ts,.7ylff 'bilhffi li.t!!il,p5.l'"*'J;iil'^sls'it"?-ffi : "ffifii[J.it[iliilli-i:ii;r;l',mi"Bx#rl'r'33ii'33311"*r?3!i: .....A''ELLANTS tvledchal - Malka'lgtn urstlrul \''uw "'--- AND ',Rifi:{xft ",*:f ,;i"illt'isfi iBl?%3P"?"''.3fl }ll?'Ifi x';';?'??;' '5;?iff '"1.9,,i,"JH,l391i,1111?j:H1?"RhfY"[ffi Foid, Secunderaoad' i]T'fs""fl il:s1',t?',?n""',1"' .BL,\I';B1'Si.?6X|LJ;[F[131,,?fl,",l#fl ELf AJ:3:"d"?i"*3l""J:!""

4. Dr. p. Surekh-a,.w/o. Dr. P. Udava {L',qn'?9"-d 1:?iL1"J"rT"3'ih3ftTir';" " Hiol n-"r'rt]ibq'vUuva Bank colonv Extenston' t Nagar, Bangalore' 5. The State of rerang.ana, rep. by its principar secretary, Revenue Department, - seiretariat, HYderabad' 6. The Collector, Medchal - Malkajgiri District'

7. The Arjdrtional Collector, Medchal _ Malkajgiri District. B. The Rr:v,:nue Divisional 9. The Tah_sild:rr. Shamirpet Mandal, Medchal _ Malka jgiri Distr ct, Officer, Keesara Division, tVedchal _ Malkajgiri District. ,.TIESPONDENTS I.A.N O:3 O F 2,025 petitior L. nrJ -"r Ser cPC praying that in the ')ircLnrstances stated pport of the petition, the High Coul may be pleased to in the affidavi,: filed ,n ,r"'on 'u' suspend the opera,tion and effect of the order r rA.No.2 or 202* ir w.p.No.1eO 81 or 2024.".';:::r,:,:",,:,"*:"0 appellate authr;6ily tc adiudicate the appeals filed by the petitionr:,rs herein under "r"Z;;:i;: Section 24 of thc.f elangana Abolition of f nrr. n. - - q ' ivvlrlrvr I ur Inams Act' 1955' oenrjirrg disposal of the writ appeal FEE[?11.^i+,fl :lT,l.^_r^T,Ii3x$Hi^+rRAMANA,sENroRcouNsEL 3:E[?11"^l*TR?il:s]1,ffi ,l#gr"^iiry,,ffi rESH,sErvroRcouNSEL Counsel for Respondent Nos.S to g : G.p FOR REVENUE W.A. NO :87 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under r.lause 1S of the Letters patent oref 11/11t2024 in w r,.r.ro .qiz a or zozi aiai;.:'#'#",,il:if!ii;T il €-order dared Between:

1. Podila Jayersree. D/o I 3 jr"[)d;li:1ru:"i;::.#$$,[m*:,:H%, j..(",.":ilr??:x,?,:,; ' [1?3,ffirtXlil:3.tlTqrr,slo'.v -seetharama -Brahmarr a,re d abour 60 ke"sara ri,ranori [,riolflrrXiliLj;it;|,:,h:l'i Nasar coro,,v tremiliduo"a] 3. Yemeni Sesha pr va. D/o V Vplkalg Ratna Sai Leela prasad. a led about 30 years, Occuoatiorr. Business, Ryo. FIri N;O'i Siiro"o Bt:ck, Sri Sai Ram Ma no r Apa rr m r; nt ; p ragathi N 4 Gogineni . liuiatta, _ W./o, G_. Lakshmi Narayana, s,;ed about 62 years,occ.Hrtuse r,yife Rt/o,H.NO.10-s-10s5, Flat N6.502, Ro:id Nc a. S;ibab; Nagar, Old ltlrn,al, Secunderabad - 500 010. DuggiraVai F'riyanka, D/o. D. Venkata Ramana, aged about 32 vear,Occ.Hc use 'ruife,H.NO.15-9-81/48, Sri Laxmi Ganapali Ni ayam, Road irlo.3, Alwat, S'lcr nderabad - 500 010. i;;'"';rd;ia, ?'yo e ru oua ";;;,' 5 6 G o s i n e n i n,ql''11'..,9I"#3 ifl;1t'-'u'i &"ul i::l ft's t#: t*r"fl,:% : 3:$'3: X:A:? 3t3 X#":i#'1";l;;a;o-' 6oo or o ,fi :nlti:E[,,8{"0.[,x";i*5:&1,,"1'-:1,,"3:ll#^x3ifr,,%'31Rfi ll''{l; FHd;fiii!;l;', Vousurguoa' HYderabad' HaYatnagar Bus DePot' '**:'{'FI-elS,:*,t"t*l*ir,"$::iliffi ,'T;':l'?0ffi ''""";3n?*R'i':"? 'ffi nht'fl"rJJ-ill',:ig;:',irru{*,,{**'ii;'3"Rirnx^,, l0.Siddhartha Dugrala,. ,,o. ,. Legrq .vyo!3n$har *;llr, il ffi r'ruou' coronv' Da m ma s uo a' " y."il,i#t ::m ^;:#: 1 1 . M e g h an a o us g i ra r a, D;o,rr...-i%:' i r,tijl,?,i iffi ,,.' 3:[ d: BX #:: i\re: mi*"1"ir'ibi't'r"t L""Hr?r"i,i:15:i 'fr"til''i Babu, aged about 26 .....AppELLANrs AND

2. J.

4. 5 6 7 o Agriculture K. Seethamma, W/o' KV' Babul Reddy' aged about 65 years' Occ' K.V. Babul Reddy, S/o' K' Seetharama Reddy' aged about 74 years' Occ' Business and Agriculture' K. Seetharam, S/o K'V' Babul Reddy' aged about 48 years' Occ' Business and Agriculture' si}3n"u'un' Hl#t?ii*#$s:tr:::t11?:?"#"{'{Il}'fiTlffi The state of rerangana, rep. by its principar secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, HYderabao' The Collector, Medchal - Malkajgiri District' The Additional Collector' Medchal - Malkajgiri District' The Revenue Divisional Officer' Keesara Division' Medchal - Malkajgiri District

9. The Tahsildar, ShamirPet Mandal Medchal - Malkajgiri District' ...RESPONDENTS r.A.NO: 30F 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to in the suspend the r>peration and effect of the order dated 11.1_.2024 passed in I A No'2 0f 2024 'n w p No 19'1 28 0f 2024 and batch so ,r; to enabre the appelrate aulhcrity to adjudicate the appears fired by the petitio,rr:rs herein under Section 24 of thet Telangana Abolition of lnams Act, 1 95S , pe nrJing disposal of the writ appe;r l. 3:E[=11.^l+rfi ;jTl"^_r^T#i?r^.sxEl,^+TJRAMANA,sENToRcouNSEL Counsel for Respondent I n e p n et e r,i ii; il,i,: ; : I |ff .l # fr ,iTiry,,T.i*rE s H, s E N I o Fr c o u N s E L Counsel for Resporrdent Nos.S to 9 : G.p FOR REVENUE W.A.NO :93 OF 202a Writ Appeal unrie. cl;ruse 1S of the Letters patent prefr 11/11t2024 in v/ r, \ > rsl13 or zozq ii tieffiffi ;[?lA1lr.,flre order Dated Between: if,qld:ffi iii1, id${#ri&id;ay"^,%:t"il,.,LrEir;;;,rd;,:#:;ir . Mandava Anrtrtha Chandra, S/o. M..Seetharama Brahnam, aged about 60 N;",I'tffi ;r: ua n, m a,,,,d a, Keesa ra il,?1ii ;, tft , I I'iff;;r,g D1,lli:li Yemeni Sesra priya, D/o. !##Hxtld'B,y#Jf,[iftX:,;3ji,inr#g&xt-:%,is:i'-:.r ",ix,s : { } i : * " 1 U,,,;, 6:8,%,y,i; !ff: *: :i lS ! ".Hi""B. }il' [T: "1'. 8}'f,[?:.]]:i1,1,,31i?:"i,?"3:HiX['T,iti;fly"0*?jt?,,,ni.11,r,y,1; Gogineni Harmi ha Chouc im:f g*,ll.ihilffi ,Y'ft Kodali Siri:;h I _ D/o, K. Ravi Kumar, aged about B,:'J:?,i,\:{:,t,t*:*::rilU:,r,tEnlvrlE',3??H,30,1,?'"T;?;:f#J;i "8Bi:"*.J#i{"[:t?;,#:f tfto""i,o1: 1 2 3 4 7 B fi fifr l:;fli:iifdlri,,,.If i3,?1r,f,y:$":p",T,:f iJn";rl?i#B;lrll 'i:li:JH'*,::nil,lru*aflt';t''''d,j"1]tT':"):T:' Is*'"*.il,3rts3:#'^^'ffi : "p3i;lliiqgi'H;it*i;:r$*ffi "H}::fl $"#tj?B|id;uT5rl?j'i'l'BT'T3'"i"tYX: ,,,y;H:l[ff itfi i,?i"%,:-",.]il?ffi l8#lfu 3S:":"'3:+'"?i"':ffi '"'" il-:rl,-XlAr^'!l;I;Y,},n:,i,ft lfl S??:fi ?S3'XB3:I??'l?11';3"" n'";:tlffi ';ruf; f, !i;o" f,,*#;;t*i"CIts*t:""'*Llf ov its P rincipal S ecretary' Revenue Department' AND

2. 4 $*El9,i,,Ir13i3;l;.'"p

5. The Collector' Medchal -Malkaigiri District' 6. The Additional Collector' Medchal -Malkajgiri District .....RESPONDENTS I.A.N O:3 OF 2025 at in the circumstances stated High Court may be Pleased to dated '1 1.11.2024 Passed in d batch so as to enable the by the Petitioners herein under Act, 1955, Pending disPosal of Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying th in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the suspend the operation and effect of the order l.A.No.2 of 2024 in W P'No'191 13 of 2024 an appellate authority to adjudicate the appeals filed Section 24 of the Telangana Abolition of lnams the writ aPPeal. counsel for Appellants : SRI VEDULA VE-ry-{lTl RAMANA' SENIOR COUNSEL #;d#niifi7i. eHanaowAJ ASSocTATES Counsel for Respondent Nos'1 to 3: SRI A'V-ENKATESH' SENIOR COUNSEL ;#RE;niJihi rvr.s. acsvurH BHARTHWAJ Counselfor Respondent Nos'4 to 6 : G'P FOR REVENUE W.A. NO i94 0F2 025 YiliiS;i,,:ilF!311r,;:,"j,!.:f Between: ff :;[T?; j;,fi El,i:,instorderDated ,llqli"iHljif tdd{##&:'-r#"^i":d"il,,,.,1}E'r;#3;,x#:Ji. 2. Mandava .,\m -utha ;:il1;i#{f,eit-",d,fl ffi ,E:'tr:rfl ,?,il}?fi ;,,i,%?1ii## "r:ffi 3. yerneni Sesh: priv. IRI:,1's;?hx,li:iil,,,:%,?s:i*,".r .1i*,t;;ii*il,'lllf{:?r,.tu'r#:ifr n'n'' *ffi " i i'{i{ii :l kHfls " "1s:8,,,,n?g,:i LiE ^a,y,i; f {ffi ;l:r,?u.:H'&[,T,?r%ny",,np,?*ifl r:,,]^r:: "{.'Jf,i*ilfl 6. Gogineni llarmrtha C ftji:gti*ilS!l,e#,y1"tu:,82:"ri#fl

7. Kodali Sirishe, D/o. I "5yr:,!;"1lj,tf,l#,o1t Ei'J:ff \i.f ;,1*t:tfl#,fi :fr 8"?fl lB,*,,1#^ilff j?,.^;"J[fl,:",.? 'fi fi{il$f ff ii?,,,:f.R;,',,fl li?l'ft ,f:*,:S,:,lt:i j,tff ,tB,yB"l:i:

9. Dasari Jharrsi D/o. D _[:;i:[is:,i,{"}#inLl[d::{;E},##,t,.,,.,"h.;,Ji.i},r,ii,ni; ,,il":;:fm]if :',;[ilt j,^1351"J",i3ti",;r*:,,;,s"f l#li,Rrialt; :fff 'r:fiiij[' jiiri^t",x?r:?J"?.8?hHj,U*sti,3tsi,,,.,ri3!]: "#ff AND ...APPELLANTS 1 2 K.V. Ramantr F.ed jy, S/o. Tirupathi Reddy' aged.about 56 vei)rs, :)rcupation Aoriculture, tUt' l' .'r'10.4-7311/'l , Bommaraspet village' shameerpt't Manoar' trltiUcnat - lril all a1g i'i District' The State o{ Telarrgana, rep. by its principar secretary, Reverue Dr:partment, Secretariat, Hlde''abad'

3. The Collector' Medchal - Malkaigiri District' 4. The Additional Collector' Medchal - Malkajgiri District' 5. The Revenu" pi'itionuf Otti""'' K""t"" Division' Medchal - Malkaigiri District. The Tahsildar' ShamirPet Mandal o Medchal - Malkaigiri District' .....RESPONDENTS t.A. N o:10F2o25 Petition Under Section 151 CPC Praying in the affidavit filed in support of the Petition' t suspend the oPeration and effect of the ord l.A.No.2 of 2024 in W.P.No 19071 of 2024 appellate authority to adi udicate the aPPeals filed bY Section 24 of the Telang ana Abolition of lnams Act' that in the circumstances stated he High Court may be Pleased to er dated 11111t2024 Passed in and batch so as to enable the herein under the Petitioners '1955, Pending disPosal of the writ appeal' E:EH$T"J#ffi YII1-,$,T=^:,^SX'"TftTRAMANA'SENIORCOUNSEL R$F;lL"Iff 3t?lf 3ll|;+'i"'ilfi XE|'SHSH'sENroRcouNSEL Counsel for Respondent Nos'2 to 6 : G'P FOR REVENUE W.A NO:9 soF 2025 fl tl fl !ffi ?, x ffi :J il3',,""J? :l il? l:J; fi ifr '5 Between: :1 il:'i[T against the order dated Court. ffi #;"[il:3?; '?%'diii,'6?"'I"|'";?61R-"S!i?5:X'?rik38"$J3:H;f'l'fi Arffii,5#;,iliiuiir - soo oto 2. Mandava Amrutha Chandra' S/o M.Seetharama Brahmam' aged about 60 vears. Rl/o. r-r.ruo.olai,'ti' Li'i t'lug"t colony' Dammaiguda' Keesara 'ntt?o;r, ia-.0"r'ui - rvr't(ajgiri District' 3. Yernenisesha Priva, D/o' v' Vent<'!a ngtnq^s9i5t1i":!"8tr;ft# 3:?H# " ;;;'b;;;fation'- susiness' FVo Flat No-101' 4. Goqineni Sujatha, W/o G Lakshmi Na.tgyunu 'M;; 6ilH;;it' F;;;iiii'lagar' Yousursuda' Hvderabad' aoed about 62 years' R/o' H.No.10_5_105S, riai"r.16.so),*Horo'r.lo.s, baiSaoa Nagar, old Alwal' Secunderabad - 500 010 ' 81,?3'ia!5?i,IJ,'ul b;;;"I[;;r:a.;ji;?1";,?'3!1311f "L1:;,fl ,.%x:,?,,.,151",,a,p"?; j*"{::!!ir#,Y'R"s3i:R'r#ir"[1,r3;,1ri,&,,"i,"1: .II,i:p#: 7. Kodali Sir.i562, pro " il':Iff '- Ii " e *l:ttsr,fi :l] 8"??i8.,'StiA #l ;g :;1 ;. o."*, n* "$fl{$ril:fdr,$r=*gI::*ix,^:::t"::",:,:i,fiTr,yB"Iri: ,.r?,,ia,o"ffr,i:,3:; ;$,f, ti{"fu;ifi "!l:+[?r;ilil;3i",f#r ;$i{#fl t#;iiid;h1##i#"*,Ti,,**r"r*f,1l,nri,lr; "#":;:fsfi :#f, ,1#+,,iia,,,:"#i5:e*?.a3h,,fj!;53"i531#L'f,,ri3!t; AND ....r\ITpELLANTS

1. K. Anitha Reddy, W/o I Homemareiti;;;*Ja_..:?,:?:i",11Jdfl

2. The State of Telanoana Secretariat, Hvderaiad., rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue frepartment, :%3?"",ij,._grlJi:?;:ll,

3. The Collector, Medchal _ Malkajgiri District. 4. The Additiorrat Coltector, Medchal _ Malkajgiri District. u J[ir[i""rr,: r)ivjsionat Officer, Keesara Division, Medchat - Mafraisiri

6. The Tahsildar. Shirmirpet Mandal, Medchal _ Malkajgiri District. l.A.NO:3 OF 2025 ,....RES PONDENTS Petition Under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circurrstarr:es stated in the affidavit {ilei irr support of the petition, the Hish courr may be l,reased to SUSpend the Operatton and effect of the order dated 11/11/ilo24 passed in il. ; or 2024':: :*):l:T: ;J4: ::: l" m:it'j:J.".:i1 appeltate *|T],Iffi]j.iuorition ot rnams A Section 24 of th e t e' the writ appeal ' ' ' FE"[.,lIft ff ffi $IXfS,T'^:,^.-SX'"TftTRAMANA'SENIORCOUNSEL Counsel for Respondent No'1 : SRI A'VENKAIESH' SENTOR COUNSEL ffi'd;;lii;ihr u.s.a+rvurH BHARTHwAJ Counsel for Respondent Nos'2 to 6 : G'P FOR REVENUE W.A.N O:'t 01 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patentpreferred against the order 11t11l2o24in W.P'No tsdq";iio[q' on the file of the Hish Court' Between: ,?%tiil:ffi"T",,";?llRd:{iiS:X.T11;3Si$#$i,l,f 3i',#3"11"}:A''; nri,"ai, s"cunOerabad - 500 010' iliJ"o;r, irrto.nut - Malkajgiri District' ' Y^11! "3,1",;'i53 fl3,"t?i :j"#,i'"r"# %ffi?'?'*l,i* ;'?'",3' ii8::f: ' ffin#gr+t*'**#ii'r**1 'ifff:[Bi*:-' Y :i 'El:*l:t;;*,i3.4+H;;:,h,:u:lt";a:"#'s:s"o'i:1"'1"i3"a'Yi I'**"3:l:';"['T,liilflY"o*10""J''',("'3'"'i'Yi' ,E$fl i1#*1',,t_ffi 'f,;{i;fl #****+353e:.H/Ri":3i:"-1#i{"5:tT*ron'"0*53;'i'o13 'u:fui:nrl,g'io"i,lti*[i&--q'^"*g'13:i[",,?'J:fi l''i',off :Ril';"ll: F;;d;fiii\;;;.., Vousursuda' HYderabad' ::xtv*?x?"bJ,iit!;";d'lllii'*3'?3H;'ii"$#"-'j':?"};31'6'YB"5i1l iili.,bj n"obv District - 501 505' '#"i;S"''J3fi Xfl :; '#:-*"'*,1",3.'-:154;1".',tj.fl:Fjp.3.i|'lf ffi ffi ;t, birgrir,i r.l"sii]Volsutsuoa, Hvderabad' ,,ai:;.,ltf ;lg:fJli:1";,-ffi i"JiiSli:'J$',?itili3"fl 333,#Rliill: ,,#"i;fi ii"o;lg:;*;,,:"#^t",*H',Jfi1'81i,'.fi L[l,33ii.33311"*li3tl, utJo"nrt - Malkalgiri District r,rt"o.t'rt - Malkajgiri District .,...A''ELLANTS AND society, nyJ:rabad .8bttC8"' S]9. V-enkateshwar Rao, ased a:out 6e years, Road No 33, 'luoi eeirirls j,l"i"iriii3'"' ' 3:I B'l:- ff13:[[:r.8,1 ^g 2. Potyhineri r.r ndhva Ra 'l"T;,iii; j1*ip:$i#,lif;t$,r5::"iil-&j:',[?,ii,3%u,fl t ,"oo"uu U:l-:tt3:?" i'rfJ3lrtffi rep bv its Principar secretary. Fleven re Department,

4. The Coltec:tor Medchal _ Malkajgiri District. 5. The Adcitional Collector, Medchal _ Malkajgiri Diskict. U |ll?r[ir".re Divisionat Officer, Keesara Division, t\,4edchat _ tVatkajgiri

7. The Tah,silrJar Shamirpet Mandal, Medchal _ Malkajgiri Distric.,. t.A.NO: 30F 202s .llE:SPONDENTS petition rJnde'section 151 cpc praying that in the ci.cur.stances stated in the affidavit "'iterd r1 r'ooon of the petition, the High ccurt ma), r)e preased to suspend the operat on and effect of the order dated 1 1t41r2iri,4 passed in r'A No 2 0f 201>'4 in w p No '191 04 0t 2024 and batch so as to enabre the appellate authority' to adiudicate the appeals filed by the petitirner s herein under section 24 0f the Te anqana Aborition of rnams Act, 1g55, pendi.r1; disposar of the writ appeal. COUNSEI fOr APPEIIAN:S : SRI V.EDULA VENKATA RAMANA, SENIC}FI COUNSEL REPRESENING M/s BHARADWAIh;6;,il;s^ Lg.r,:1_g Counset for Respondent REPRESENTS SRI M.{;.AcHYUTH BH;iiiiv;j., Counsel for Responde.nt Nos.3 to 7 : G.p FOR REVENUE The Court made the following COMMON JUDGMENT : - 2 , SRt A.VENKATESH, SENTOR I;OUNSEL THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. .,USTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT APPEAL Nos.82 a5 a6 87 93 94 95 AND 1()1 0F2025 COMMON JUDGMENT (per the Hon'ble tLLe Acting Chief Justice) Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana, learned Senior Counsel represents M/s.Bharadwaj Associates, learned counsel flor the appellants, Sri Avinash Desai, iearned Senior Counsel represents Sri M.Pranav, lcarned counsel icrr the unofficia_l respondents in W.A.No.B2 of 2025 and Sri A. Vcnkatesh, learned Senior Counsel represents Sri M.S. Achyuth Bharthwaj, learned counsel for the unofficial respondents in W.A.Nos.B6, 87, 93, 94, 95 and lOl of

2. Since the common order of learned single Judge passed in batch of Writ Pel-itions is subject matter of challenge, on the joint request of the parties, the matters were analogously heard on admission and decided by this common judgment.

3. In this batch of Writ Appeals, the common order dated ll.ll.2024 passed in I.A-No-2 ot 2024 in W.P.Nos. 16967, I9OZl, 19081, I9OB7, 19089, l9l}4, 19113, 19l2B of 2024 and I.A.No.3 of 2022 in W.P.No.44B02 of 2022 is subject matter of challenge. The relevant portion of the common order reads thus: 2 HACJ & RY,I v,/A 8,1 2025 & Batch a_r Trt ::rse of the writ petitioncrs is that their prece:essors- " in title v crr granted Occupancy Rights Certiht;ate; (O RCs) vide ProceeCin.qs No.M/4751i975 dated 3 1 08' 19i 6 s..bs".1u,-, t,',.' they acquired various extents of la'.rds f-om the ORC h,rl<i,:-s. N.arly four dccades later, tlre unofhcial respordt rtLr; have hled applications disputing the nalrlre of the enquirl',)oIr(;ucted un<ler the said Acl' ocLe Siiirr:rt posses si,trt and enjoymenL of thc subjcct prop€rll/ or I t()re iour declrlt s. t['re issues as to whether lhe prt:clr:ces sc'r ;-in rre )loce of thc p<'trr,ioners were granted ORCs by tollon'ing 12q,, enrl rrhether such righ[s are validly L]-anslel-r( c to petitionc'rs, requires to be adj'-rdicated at the timt of i-rearing. It is settled Law thai settled po:iitio I cilllno disturrei to unsettle, at this Ienglh time lhe writ pctitione-s lravc bcen in -title ss of ' r the aloresaid reasons F'o dismis,st tl rtnil the interim orders qrantcd ear are mird,: tr tsolut.e." [he vacate stary -pet Lttons are liqr bv__1ltts Qqu!! (Ernpl'r r sis S upplied) I-earnt,cl Scnior Counscl for the appeilturts submits that

4. although 'Jy'f it Pct'itions are still pending arrd bf im rugn':d interim order vacrt!: rs,rt1' petitions liled by tl-re appellants are rlismissed, the Writ ,\p;p,: a1s cart be enlertained in view of jlrdgre:nt of the Supreme Courl in Midnapore Peoples' Coop' Bal:rl< Ltd' v' Chunilal Nanclal.

5. The o thc r side supported the impugned or<ler a nd agreed that at be st a direction may be issued to the learn':cl sirrgle Judge to decide the pending Writ Petitions on merits at th'r €rarliest' ' 1zooe1 s scc:rss 3 HAO & RY,J WA_82_2025 & Datch

6. A careful reading of impugned order shows that the Writ Petitions are still pending and interim order granted by learned single Judge was not vacated ancl applications filed for vacate stay were dismissed. In this backdrop, it is to be seen whether these Writ Appeals can be entertained.

7. In The University of Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar, Central University Campus iF.O), Gachibowli, Hyderabad v. Sadik Hussain and Others2, a Division Bench of this Court considered clause 15 of the Letters patent and opined that it provides a, appeal from a Judgrnent, of single Judge in exercise of original jurisdiction to a Division Bench. The previous judgment of a Division Bench in Shah Babulal Khimji v. Jayaben D.Kania3 was considered and it was held that ,ord_ers categories (iu) and (u) are not ,jt-tflg1n nts' for the purpose of fiting cLppeals prouided under the Letter patent. Categories (iv) and (v) read thus: falLing und.er "(iv) Routine orders which are passed to facilitate the progress of the case till its culmjnatron in the hnat judgment. (v) Orders which may cause some inconvenience or some prejudice to a parry, but which do not finally determine the rights and obligations of the parties. 2013 SCC OnLine Ap 342 1981 AtR 1786 4 HACI & RY,J V1/A 8: .1025 & Batch - Lastly, the Divir;jon Bench recorded as under: " At tho cos;t ,rf thc repetition, i[ is to be noticed tha thrr :]earned Siigi. .l"ag" has not decided the rights and obligrrtions of the-parties and onlv passed interlocutgrv o14e!s atuJ' hence d9"= 4-o! sat:isfv the in irn- -"q lhCjrlaglqrgtq as defined under clausr: 15 of GrfilCqlit th" l-.it.r. Patent and it will be approPriate lbr the appellant to file vacate petition' Acc-ordingl ', th c w.il appeal is dispcsecl c1- rvith the said obser:vation " . "id*"d ""-" ,i.* (trrrPh;rsr s S rPPlied)

8. In Midnapore Peoples' Coop' Bank Ltd' (supra), on which heavy relia,n':e s placed, the Supreme Court helrl as un 1t:r: r-1 ordcrs.i inLerlocutory orders passi:ci cluri 16, Ll-re ol i1 case, fall undcr one or the other <'f tlre f 11 orving " 15. Inte ri pender c1 categol ic ; (r) Orclers; r'r'hich finally decide contro\/cr::] ln the main case- a questlon ()r 1;s,Lle ln (irJ Orrlers ,r hich hnally decide an issue which m'rtt:r a 1y and directl5, .rflt cls the hnal decision in the main casc' (lirJ Ord,.;rs u'l'rich finally decide a coilateral i:;sttc ot which is n( 1 the subject-mattcr o[ thc main case' Itlcstlon (iu) Rout it-Lt Lhe case t Ll :rrders which are passecl to facilitzrte Lhe pr rllress ol its culmination in the final judgme rr (u) Ord,:rs \\'hich may cause some Incon\rclller c': :)] some prejucticc i( :r party, but which do noL finaLl1 d:ler n ne the rights a,-rcl cbligations of the parties.

16. The 1(l 'tr "judgme nt" occurring in clause 15 c'f th : Lelters Patent ..r.ill at<e inio its fold not only the .iudg'ncnts ar; dclined in Sc(:ti,)l1 2(9) CPC and orders enumerated in Orcr:r z 3 Rule 1 CPC, but rlso.other orders which, though ma5r not frnally and conclusively determine the rights of parties *itl tegard. to all or any matters io controversy, ma"7 have frnatity irr regard to some collateral matter, whir:h will affect the vital and valuable rights and obligatiorLs of the parties, lr lel-iocutory orders which flall under czr cgolir:s (rJ to 5 HACJ & RY,J WA_82_2025 & Batch (ltJ above, are, therefore, " judgments,, for the purpose of hling appeals under the Letters patent. On the other hand, orders falling under ca tesories iu) and (ul are not udsmen ts" for Drovided under the l,e tters Patent." se of filin gaD "1 (trmphasis Supplied) o The Supreme Court in a recent judgment in Shyam Sel And Power Limited v Shyam Steel Industrids Limiteda took a similar view

10. The Supreme Court laid down the ljlmus test to determine whether order impugned is a J udgment, within the meaning of Letters Patent. if the present rnatter is examined on the anvil of said principles, it will be clear that (i) by impugned order the learned single Judge has not fina1ly decided the question or issue in controversy in the main case, (ii.) thc impugned order has not decided any issue which materially or directiy allects final decision in the Writ Petitions, (iii) the i;npugned order does not have aly impact on a collateral issue or question which was not subject matter of main case. 1 \ 1 1. The impugned order does not give any fina1 finding. It can be seen from yet alother allgle, if ultimately Writ petitions are dismissed, the appellalts will be able to pursue their pending appeals before the appropriate authority and, therefore, it calnot \ ) o - 2q2-zlyeraw 1sc1 zaz 6 HAC] & RY,J \VA t2 2025&Batch o be said thrlt th: order rmpugned herein has an1' elemerrt of finality in it.

12. Q6nrrs 156 1..., (i) the impugned order is : r rout'ir e order to facililate the 1;'rrgress ol the case till culminatioLr of finrLl judgment ar-rd (ii) :-rcr r ights or obligations ol the p:u'tie s r''i rc hnally dcterminecl. I'hus, a conjoint reading of both the judgments re ferred a.b,rvc lcads to only one ilrevitable clnclLrsir )rL that the impugned orrlr,-cloes rrot fall within the -nbit rl{ ludgln:nt'under Letter Pa tc nt Thus, the prcsent Writ Appc als r annot be cntertaint:cl . 1ltlwever, in the interest of justlt:':' r"e :rre only inclined.oo]servethatthelearnedsingle.Ilr.lgernaymake endeavour 1-o rlecide the pending Writ Petitions erp':dit outsly'

13. willt ltr aloresaid observations and witt'otlt cr1 r-ssing any opinion on lrl,l-ils, the Writ Appeals are dispost:d oI 'l'here shall be no ordcr as, to costs Miscc'11a neous aPPlications, if any pc:'r,lir g, s rall stand closed. I //TRUE COPY// SD'-NIOHD. ISMAIL PEPUTT REGISTRAR sE()]1ON OFFICER To

1. The Prncipal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretari']t' S''ate of Telang ana at HYderabad.

2. The Ccllectcr fr,4edchal - tvlalkajgiri District. 3. The ACdil.ioral Collector, Medchal - lVlalkajgiri District' 4. The R€,v€)n J: Divisional Officer, Keesara Division, Medcllal - l/alkajgiri 5. The Tahsilclrtr Shamirpet tvlandal, Niledchal - N4alkalgiri D islrit t 6.TwoC(l's;toG.PFORREVENUE,HighCoudfortheStateo'lelanganaat District. Hyde'ab.rc. {)UT) t

7. One CC to M/s BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES, Advocate tOpUCl 8. One CC to SRI M.S.ACHYUTH BHARTHWAJ, Advocate tOpUCl 9. One CC to SRI M.PRANAV, Advocate (OPUC) 10.Two CD Copies MSA BS \ HIGH COLIRT DATED:1ilA212025 COMMON "JUDGMENT WA.Nos.8 2., tls, 86, 87, 93, 94,95 AlrrD 101 OF 2025 (' e o t)

1.- ., it, s l, q,rS (' (' ? 0 Jur 2025 i .!. .1 -: .. /' _r/ 't .-.- .,;_ t ,. - , I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEALS WITHOUT COSTS. I Itt D