The High Court · 2025

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High'cJurt may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No. 3 considering the petitioners representation dated 17.1 1.2o2s for not conducting the enquiry against the Respondent No.4 and who declined registering crim6 against the Respondent No 4 herein which is iflegar, arbrtrary in the inGrest of leisflce and pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper rn the circumstances in the interest of justice. consequenfly direct respondent 2 and,3 to register the complaint made by the petitioner dated 'r 7.'1 1 .2025 against respondenls 4 and take up the investigation there cf pending disposal oi the main writ petition in the interests of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. M. MADHAVI LATHA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4:-- The Court made the following: ORDER x IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF IELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SH]IAVAN KUMAR Between M.Sarmas Vali Writ Petition No.36312 of 2O2! DATtr: 28.11.2025 Pe titioner AND The State of Telangana, represented b,t, ir. ,.,r,:rpal Secretary, Home Depanment, Secretariat, Hyderabad and : ,hers. . Respondents ORDER This lr,rit petition has been filed seel<irL 1 the follon,ing prayer "...declaing the inaction of the Res;:-, considering the petitioners represenlot 17 11.2025 for not conducting the enquinl Respondent Nos.4 qnd 5 st+4 tuho decline:<l crime against the Respondent No.4 herc. illegal, arbitrarg in the interest of justice on-, other order or orders as deemed fit and p, circumstances in the interest of .itL consequentlg direct respondent Nos.2 and j the complaint made by the petitioner datecl ag ainst responderuts No.4 and I and to inuestigation thereof pending clisposal of th< petition. . . " tclent No.3 on dated rgainst the regtsteing . tuhich is pa.ss stzch tper in the ;tice aftd to register 7.1 1.2025 ce up the main urit

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitior, r- dnd learned Assistant Government pleadcr for Home appear . rg on behalf of \. ::2i: respondent Nos.1 to 3- With their consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at tl-re admission stage. Notice to respondent No.4 is hereb.v dispensed u,ith

3. The facts of the case in brief are that petitioner claims to be Chief Executivc Officer o[ trther Wing Aerospace Pvt.Ltd., and in the course of organizing a major national-level aerospace innovation event titlcd "lnnovators Conclave 2O25" at BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, he was introduced to respondent No.4 on 12.12.2024, r.r'ho presented himself as capable and influential organizer u,ith access to hundreds of engineering colleges across the Country. Respondent No.4. claimed that he had strong connections with over two hundred institutions and that he could mobilize a minirnum of six hundred to seven hundred students for the event. Accordingly, petitioner entered into a written agreement with respondent No.4 that respondent No.4 would fulfill all his commitments. However, respondent No.4 deceived the pctitioner and the event got collapsed eventually. Thc petitioner suffered financial loss and damage to the reputation of his company. In that regard, petitioner made a representation to respondent authorities on 17 .11.2025 ;F7r l ) 3 detailing aI1 the events. Since no action is it rthcoming, the present writ petition is liled

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleaclr r for Home, on instructions, u'ould submit that pctitioncr- has sent the complaint dertcd 17.11.2025 through Post tcr soondent No.2 r,r,hich rr,.as unsigned. However, basing on the szud complaint respondcnt authorities made GD Entr-r, and tl-rc petitioner after ser-rding complaint did not approach the Po1rr, St:rtior-r alor-rg with relevant clocuments. As such, responclenl I o.2 sent nolrce r t to the petitioner througl-r Post on 22.11.2025 sti ring that as and u,hen the petitioner approaches the Police Sta cn w,ith signed complaint and relevant documents, necessar-\. action rvill be initrated as per iaw.

5. After arguing for some time, learned ( ounsel for the petitioner submitted that he would make a l csh complaint before respondent authorities and prayed thrs Court to pass appropriate orders to that effect

6. Recording the submissions made by lear red counsel on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of grrr rting liberty to ii4:.: the petiLioner to approach respondent authorities and file a fresh complaint. Once such complaint is made by petitioner, respondent authorities shall consider the same and take appropriate action strictlv as per the procedure contemplated undcr la\'v. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this r.r,rit petition shall stand closed. No costs SD/.K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 500022 Secunderabad - 500056 1 The^Principal Secretary, Home Depadment, Secretanat,T.S., Hyderabad _ 2. . The Commissioner of police, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Neredmet, 3. The station House officer (SHo). Jawahar Naqar potice station, GIVIFS {olus) " v'!v" v \v,uo,, 1 9ne CC to Ms. rV tVtADHAVt LATHA, Aouo.rt" iijpucl 5. Two CCs to Gp FOR HON/E ,High Courr ioitne btite oiTetangana at 6. Two CD Copies 7J3, EctL- Keesara Road, Keesara. Secrnde;;ba;: sor5ol Hyderabad [OUTI BM BS : I 1 i i I i I I I I i i i HIGH COURT DATED:2811112025 ORDER WP.No.36312 of 2025 :'-r a-r !ls )i... \] C a. 2 3 Jrll 2U6 t rr..l i. '\ : ,i)li '/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS Irt IA7