The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.2 in not considering the representation dated O4lO3l2O25, duly acknowledged by the office of the 2nd Respondent is illegal, arbitrary and caprecious and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 6 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.03.2025 and finalise service benefits including the arrears of salary, gratuity, pension and all other service benefits in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the , ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou t may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 6 to consider the representzrt on oi the petitioner daled 0410312025 and finalise the release of service t t nefits including the arrears of salary, gratuity, pension and other service benef ts, pending disposal of the writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petitior Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: ASST. Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.36O35 OF 2025 THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FTVE Between: Charkala Linganna AND . . . Petitioner The State of Telangana, represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Hyderabad, and five others. ORDER: . . . Respondents With the consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the follow"ing relief "..-fo issue an order or uit more particularlg one in the nature of uit of mandamus bg declaing the inaction on the part of the respondent No.2 in not consideing the representation dated O4.O3.2O25, dulg acknoLuledged bg the offtce of the 2,d Respondent is iLlegal, arbitrary and capicious and mnsequentlA dtrect the respondents 1 to 6 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.03.2O25 and finalise seruice beneftts including the arrears -- \- _ .q'41 !1 o of salary, gratuitg, pension and all other seruce ,t nefits in the interest of .iusttce qnd ta pass. .."

3. Heard Sri Raj Kui:,rr Grandhi, learned lounsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader ftr: Home icr the respondents

4. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits tt at the petitioner, u.hile serving as Inspector of Police, Narsaprr Circle, Medak District, was clismissed from service l-'y p - rt'-eedings dated

23.05.2015 on the ground of his conviction in C l. No-22 of 2Ol4 renclered b1,, the learned I Additional Special Jud 1 : for SPE & ACB Cases, Hvderabad and during the subsisterr:e o[ the said punishment of dismissa-I, the petitioner atta i red the age of superannuation on 30.O4.2017 and conseque - Jy retired from sen'ice. It is further submitted that the p( t tioner preferred Criminal Appeal No.355 of 2016 before this Cotrr challenging his conviction, and the said appeal was allowecl on 28.02.2025, resulting in his acquittal from all the charges. t ursuant thereto, the petitioner submitted a representation datt:, 04.03.2025 to respondent No.1 requesting settlement of his pers ionnn' and other benehts. I{o1r'eyer, no action has been taken by r,) l)ondent No.1 so 3 far. Therefore, learned counsel prays this Court to direct respondent No.1 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.O3.2025 and pass appropriate orcicrs within a time-frame that may be stiPulated bY this Court'

5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents fairly submits that respondent No 1 will consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.O3.2025 and pass appropriate orders' in accordance with law.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties ald u''ithout going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No' 1 to consider the representation dated 04 03 '2025 submitted by the petitioner, duly taking into consideration the judgment dated 28.02.2025 passed by this Court in Crl A'No'355 of 2016' and pass appropriate orders thereon, strictly in accordance with law' as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate a copy of the decision to the petitioner' E 4 Miscellaneorrs petitions, if any, pending irr . his Writ Petrtron sl-rall stand closed There shall be no order as to I )sts' SD/ P. PONNA KRISHNA AS; STANTREGISTRAR \\\\r ------) SE CTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, B N LS Hvderabad Secretariat, HYderabad. r The Soecial Chief Secretary, Home Department' The S'l lte of Telangana' '' 2 i;;'F;".idal 3ecretary, Home Department' Telanganzr ltate' Secretarrat' :. rilE o""".tr General of Police, Telanqana State'Hyder tbad a The Addl. Director ceneia] o=#otice, Fersonal' offiie rl the DGP' Telangana - pJiid n"rn Quarters, Lakdikapool,Hyderabad c The Dv. lnspector cen"rai oidolice$ie@@ector(: crtro'ffior'ei " rtririr'joro'Range' Nizamabad' 6 iff's;pJn"nt"no-",it ot poiice, naiwav Police, secund': abad ; o;;tii; snr c nn.xuMAR, Advobate. toPuql 6 iil 66,i" Cp Foi noir,tE, nigh court tcir gre Siate I relansana [OUr] 9. Two CD CoPies W HIGH COURT DATED:01 11212025 ORDER WP.No.36035 of 2025 .^-- t .rC ?ffi ':, '\_ -:*-z DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS $1 q v ;l: