✦ High Court of India · 26 Nov 2025

1. Sri. GadusuYadaiah v. 1. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,041 words

Registration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana 3. Thasildar, lbrahimpatnam, Telangana 4. Sri. M. Anjan Kumar, S/o. Late Rama Krishna Reddy Aged about- Major, Occ- Agriculture, Fi/o- Mangalpalli Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

5. Sri. M. Amarender Reddy, S/o. Late Rama Krishna Reddy Age abou! Major, Occ- Agriculture, R/o- Mangalpalli Village,lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

6. Sri. P Venkat Rao, S/o. Kishan Rao Aged about- Major, Occ- Agriculture, Fi/o- Mangalpalli Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

7. Sri. K Shiva Kumar, S/o. Pochaiah Agred about- Majnr, Occ- Agriculture, Fi/o- Mangalpalli Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

8. Smt. K. Manga, W/o. Shiva Kumar Aged abod- Major, Occ- Agriculture, R/o- Mangalpalli Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

9. Sri. Pandu Ranga Reddy, S/o. Ram Reddy, Aged about- Major, Occ- Agriculture, Fl/o- Mangalpalli Village, lbrahimpatnamMardal, Ranga Reddy District

10.Smt. Srilatha, Wo. Narsimha Reddy Aged about- Malrr, Occ- Agriculture, F:/o- Mangalpalli Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 1'l .Sri. Srinivas Reddy, S/o. Ram Reddy Aged about- l/ rjor, Occ- Agricutture, Rl/o- Mangalpalli Village, lbrahimpatnamMandal, Rang I Reddy District

12.Smt. Vena, Wo. Konda Reddy A ged abou! Major, )cc- Agricullure, R/o- Mangalpalli Village,lbrahipatnaril Mandal, Ranga Reddy Districi

13. Smt. -Shantfamma, Wo. Ram Reddy Aged abou! Ir4 rjor, Occ- Agriculture, R/o- Mangalpalli Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Rangz itebdy Distri-ct

14. Sri. E Satyanaryana, S/o. Ramchandra Reddy Aoe about- Maior. Occ- Agriculture, Fi/o- Mangalpalli Village, tbrahimpatnam I landal, Ranja Reddy District

15. Smt. F Sathyamma, W/o. Ramchandraiah Aged about- Major, Occ- 'Reddy Agriculture, F/o- Mangalpalli Village, lbrahimpatn-am \ andal, Ranga District

16.!Us, Baptist_Church, Represented by its pastor Ag,: I about- Major, Occ- Agricufture, Rt/o- Mangalpalli Village,-lbrahimpatnam Ir andal, Ranja iReddy District

17.Sri. Krishna. Re.ddy, S/o. Ram Reddy Aged about- Ivt; lor, Occ- Agriculture, R/o- Mangalpalli Village, tbrahimpatnam Mandat, Rangt heddy Distri'ct

18.Sri. Chinthapalli Sadananda Sadguru Reddy, S/o. Na asimha Reddv Aoed Mangalpalli Vi lage, lbrahimiratn-am about-. Major, Occ-. Agriculture, -Rl/o- Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

19.Sri.. Chinthapalli Vivekananda Reddy, S/o. Narsimha Reddy Aged about- [ajor, _Occ-. Agriculture, Rt/o- Mangalpalli Village, lt,r rhimpitna-m Mandii, Ranga Reddy District

20.Sri. K. Sri Ramulu Shetty, _S/o_ Christaiah Shefty Ag,: I about- Major, Occ- Agriculture, R/o- Mangalfalli Viflage, lbrahimpatriam-tv andal, nang', heddy District , ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndii praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the ligh Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction, more so in rt e nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent no. 3 in ectifying the entries without any notice to the petitioner in respect of land to an ei( 3nt of Ac.17-2g gts., comprised in Survey Nos. 240, 241, 242 situated at I 4angalpally Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, ar ritrary, high handed and contrary to the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Larr I and pattadar pass Books Act, 2020 and contrary to the principles of natural justice, violative of Articles 14, 21, 3OO-A of constitution of lnclia and consequently direct the third respondent to take steps for rectification of petitioners name in the revenue records in relation to land to an extent o1 Ac.17 -28 g(s., comprised in survey NoS. 240, 241, 242 siluated at Mangalpally Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to deal with any revenue entry in any manner in relation to land to an extent of Ac.17-28 gts., comprised in survey Nos.240, 241, 242 situated at Mangalpally Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4, 6 to 9, 11, 18 & 19: SRI MALIPEDDt SRINIVAS REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.'|6: SMT. P. NIREEKSHANA The Court made the following: ORDER \ \ THE HONOI'RABLE SRI JUSTICE IT SARATH UIRIT PEIITION No.46711 of 21t22 ORDER: This petition is coming up for hearing :; nce 2022. On \ \

12.11.2025, when the matter was called, le arned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has giv,: r no objection vakalat to the petitioners and he has no ins -ructions from them to pursue the matter and requestec time to file a memo to that effect. In view of the same, tir: Registry was directed to list the matter on 26.11.2025 un( er the caption "For Dismissal". 2- Today, when the matter is taken r.p for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits t-l a.t he has filed Memo urde USR.No.135444 dated 26.t 2025 in rhe Registry with regard to no objection r i kalat to ttre petitioners. It seems that the petitioners ar() not interested to prosecute this case. i. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default/non-prosecution. No order as to costs 2 Miscellaleous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. d,- M. osMAN AL! SISTANT /TTRUE COPY'/ bnot.t orrtCER toPUCI State of Telangana at

1. One CC to SRI G. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY' 2. TMrc CCs to GP for Revenue' High Court for Hvderabad touTl 3. One CC to SRI MAL 4. One CC to SMT' P' 5. Two CD CoPies IPEDDI SRINIVAS REDDY' Advocate [OPUCI NIREEKSHANA, AdVOCAIE TOPUCI / To MP. SK , HIGH COURT DA]'lD:2611112025 ?ltt ;( o$ o O 2 7 JAN ?Oi ) t Cr.SP .i ORDER WP.No.46711 of 2022 DISMISSING THE V\I IIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT/NON.P ! IOSECUTION WIT']{OUT COSTS @ so, 4-e,

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments