High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent nos.2 and 3 in not taking steps to stop the illegal construction activity and not demo shing the illegal construction carried on the property belongs to the petitioner at premises no. 22-3-338, 340 and 341 admeasuring 343.88 sq. yards situated at Bowli Mager, Behind Police station, Mandi Mir Alam, Hyderabad, despite representation dt.4-9-2014 submitted by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to demolish the illegal structures in premises of the petitioner. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 35440 0F 20141 Petition under Section '15'1 CPC praying that in the i.cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High co r . may be pleased to direct the respondent nos.2 and 3 to take immediate action, rr the representation dt.4-9-2o14 submitted by the petitioner with regard to unau:i orized constructions carried in his premises i.e premises no. 2Z-3 338, 340 ;r d 341 admeasuring 343.88 sq. yards situated at Bowli Mager, Behind police st;r1 :,n, Mandi Mir Alam. Hyderabad, pending disposal of writ petition in the interest o justice. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP. NO:39003 OF 20141 Between: YVameq Tanveer, S/o. Late A.A.Khan, aged about 35 I rars, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No.8-3- 1 68lEl47 , Khan's Residency, Raliv Naga , -lyd erabad-500045. AND 1 Habeeb lmran, 12-2-717tN14, Hyderabad. ...|MPLE r DING PETTTTONER/ PROPOSEtt,tESpONDENT No.5 S/o. Habeeb Hyder, Aged 63 Saptagiri Nagar Colony. Rethi Ye rrs, ll ,vrli, Occ Nil, R/o. Mehd ipatnam,

2. The Government of relangana Rep by its principal. iecretary, IVlunicipal Administration, Secretariat. Hyderabad.

3. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal, Cor .ration, Tank bund, Hyderabad.

4. The Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, Circle-lV, Hyderaba J 5. Mr. Ahmed Salam Bin lrlahafeez, S/o late Saam Bint ltlahateez Aged 44 years, occ business Rlo 22-3-33211 Mandi Miralar , magar ki- bowli, Hyderabad. (Respondents No.2 to 5 are not necessary parties to this r:tition) Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the <;r cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou 1 rnay be pleased to r the above Writ implead the petitioner as proper and necessary party proceedings arraying him as respondent No. 5 in the interest f justice. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.V.HANUMANTHA RAO 1rucr :REsENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR MCPL ADMN & ..t IBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI RAPARTHI VENKATESH, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI UZAIR KHAN, REP. SRI SALEH BIN ALI LAHMADI Counsel for the Proposed Respondent SRI GULAM MUSTAFA RABBANI The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OII TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NAR/i .ANA ALISHETTY WRIT pETITTON No.283O8 of Z) 1! DATED:3O. 1 2.2025 Betwee n: Habeeb Imran AND The GovernrnerLt of Te lang:tna, Rep bf ils Prirrciltal Secrct:rry, Municipal Ad mini s tra tio Lr, Secretariat, Hl,clera bad and 3 others ORDER: ...Petitioner .. . Responde nts This u'rit petition rs filcr.l seeking follor,vir-ig -t l . f. "To declare the ctct[on of the responrle t nos.2 cotd 3 in not talting sfeps to stop the illegal cons,, tction actiuity and not demolishlng the tllegal constntctiol ttried ort the propertA beLongs rc the pet[lioner ctt premises tto.22-3-338, 340 and 341 cLdmeasuing 343.gg sq. U(r ( :; situate:d at Bou.tli Mager, Behitd police statiorl, Ma t t.t. Ivfir Alam, Hgderabad, despite representation dt.4_g ,, I I subm.itted bg the petitioner as iLlegol, arbitrary and, lb, tortsequerLtial relief. "

2. No representation on behalf of the petitirr rrr. Venkatesh, learned Stancling Counsel lbr respor r :nt Nos.2 ancl 3 and Sri Uzair Khan, learncd Counsel reprcscntinrl :lrr SaleLL Bin Ali Lahmadi, learneC Counsel for re spondent No.4 ar. I -esent. Sri Raparthi I 2

3. On 11.12.2025, when the matter rvas taken up for hearing, none appearcd on behalf of the petitioner and the matter u'as directed to be listed todar,, under the c:rptron "lor dismissal" Even today, u'hen thc mattcr is called, there is no rcpresentation on behalf of pctilioner, in spitc of the matter being listed under the caption "for dismissal".

4. In vieu, ol the above, it allpcars that the petitioner is uot interested in proseculing lhc matter

5. In the said circumstances, this Writ Petition is dismissed for no n-pro secutio rt. Thcre shall bc t-ro ordcr as Lo costs Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed //TRUE COPYil SD/- C.DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To,

2. a

5. One CC to SRI M.V.HANUMANTHA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI SALEH BIN ALI LAHMADI, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI GULAM MUSTAFA RABBANI, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI RAPARTHI VENKATESH, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 6 Two CD Copies BSR PSK HIGH COURT DATED: 3011212025 ORDER WP.No.28308 of 2014 \- , '\r xl. lr tl :i1 i"lt =$ \*-t l:;.- i-t i(J u- H'ri: DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS K-q nl>l>c