✦ High Court of India · 19 Nov 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 19 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
19 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,059 words

5. VIF College of Engineering & Technology, (sponsored by VIF Educational Society), Himayathnagar Village, MoinabZd M'andal, Ranla Reddy District, Rep. by its Secy and Correspondent, Ms. Zehra Subuhi Arif.

6. l_VRy. College of Pharmacy, {sponsored by MRM Educational Society), lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. tiy its Secretary/Conespondeni. Mohd. Habeebuddin.

7. Mohammadiya lnstitute of Technology, (sponsored by Mohammadiva F-ducatronal Soglety), Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Chairman, Mohd. Ghouse Moinuddin. B. Azad Collgge of Engineering & Technology, (sponsored by Azad Educational Society), l/oinabad, Ranga Reddy Distiict, Rep. by its Chairman, Mohd. Ghouse Moinuddin.

9. Noor Colleg^e of Engineering and Technology, (Sponsored by Noor Educational Society) Noor Gate, Sotipur Village Shadnigar (M) , Mehboob Nagar District. Repi6sented by its Joini Secreta-ry Mr. Mirzi nsiUirlian Oa6. '10. Mona College .of . Engineering and Technology, (Sponsored by Mona Educational Society) Opposite YSR Park, Gollaguda (V) Nalagonda- District. Represented by its Chairman Mr. Akheel Ahmed.- 't 1.gana .College of Engineering, (Sponsored by Sana Educational Society) Kodad, Nalgonda. Represented by its Secretary Mr. Mohammed Nazeeruddi-n 12.ARKAY College of Engineering, (Sponsored by Arkay Educational Society) Achanpally, Bodhan Nizamabad (Dist)., Rep by'its Prihcipal and Director M-r. Mohd. Hafeezuddin 1 3. Vidya Vik_as lnstitute of Technology, (Sponsored by Vir1. a Vikas Educational Society) Chevella, ranga Reddy Distici. Rep.by itd Se:,. tvtr. Syed TouaJai Ahmed.

14.9yed Hashim College of Science and, Technoloqv, ()ponsored bv Sved Hashim Educational Society) Plegnapur, Medak DiEirir t hepresented by its chairman, Mr. Syed Khurshe6d Ahhed. 1 5. Sana College of Pharmacy, (Sponsored by Sana Educa.i rnal Society) Kodad, Nalgonda. Represented by its Secretary [Vir. Mohammec .lazeeruddi'n 16 f[ugla][41i. Khan, S/o.Zahoor Nawaz Jung, Aged arout 55 years, Rl/o 3-5-1 21 lEl 1 I 1 . Ramkote, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU), Hla erabad, rep. by its Registrar. Government of Telangana, rep. by its principal S€(.etary, Hiqher and lechnrcal Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Il derdbad. -

3. Commissioner of Hyderabad. Technical Education, Governm,: rt of Telangana,

4. The Convener, PGECET-AC SW-ll-2014-15 (Admissions) Hyderabad Telangana State Council for Higher Education, 1st floor Campus, Mahaveer Marg, Opp Mahaveer Hospital, Roac Hyderabad, Telangana. INTU, Masab Tank ',1o. 1, Masab Tank,

6. AP State Council for Higher Education. 1st floor, JNTU, I\1, sab Tank Camous. Mahaveer. Marg, Opp Mahaveer Hospital, Road No 1. Masab Tbnk, HyoeraDao, tetangana

7. Admission,& Fee Regulatory committee for, Matters Rela ing to Fee Fixation . 1st _floor, (lj )ufh Wing) Gagan rn Pflvate-Unaided Professional Vihar, MJ Road, Hyderabad, rep. by its Member Secreian, Co. lleges, .

8. All lndia council for Technicar Education, Represen r d bv its Member Secretary, Tth Ftoor, Chandratok Building, Janpath, New D iini_if tjOOi'-'-- 9. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Iep by its principal S.r retary, Higher and Technical Education Department, Secret6riat Buildirigs, H y ieraO'dO. - - - - ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia l raying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hi rh Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, one more particular y, in the nature of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to treat the pt: itioners as validly approved institutions for the purpose of making admissions to 1re post-Graduate courses in Engineering, Pharmacy and Architecture on the rasis of approval granted by the 8th Respondent and the state Government anc further direct the 4th respondent to notify and make admissions to the petitioner institutions for the intake capacity sanctioned by the AICTE. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 32801 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to notify and include the petitioner institutions in the counseling process to be conducted for Post-Graduate courses in Engineering, Pharmacy and Architecture for the academic year 2014-15 for the intake capacity sanctioned by the Respondent pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. SAI PRIYA, REP. SRI P.PANDU RANGA REDOY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SRI M.MEHBOOB ALl, SC FOR AICTE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA I LISHETTY WRIT PETITION N0.26229 of 2OL1 ORDER: This rvrit petition is liled seeking lollowing rc rei: "To direct the respondents to treat the pe,i ioners as ualidLy approued institutions for admissi,r r.s lo fhe Post-Graduate courses in Engineeing, pha. nacA and Architecture on the basis o/ approual ct tnted. bg respondent No.8 and State Gouerutmert and for consequential relief . "

2. Ms.Sai Priya, learned Counsel representin; Sri p.pandu Ranga Reddy, learncd Counsel lor petitioncrs on lcorcl and Sri M.Mehboob Ali, lezrrned Standing Counsel [<rr rc; ronclent No.B present.

3. Learned Counsel for petitioners u,ould sui rniL that the cause in the prescnt Writ petition does nOt survive for adjudication, and it has become infructuous

4. Recording thc above submission, thc Wr i perition is dismissed as infiuctuous. There shall be no order r i to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if ani., shalI stand closed-. SD/- IIJI.OSMAN ALI BAIG A$$rSTANT REGISTRAR /TTRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 One CC to SRI P PANDU RANGA REDDY' Ad One CC to SRI M.MEHBOOB ALl, SC FOR AICTE [OPL C] Two CCs to GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, High ( ourt for the State of Telangana at HYderabad [OUT] [(: 'UC] N 4 Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED: 1911112025 ORDER WP.No.26229 of 2014 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS \,u $t =\ .ra; TTHES t4 Jt' ) J t 6 il8 2026 z * Ct *

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments