High Court · 2025

3,Mr.Siddarthtvlenon.S/o.MukundanMenon,Agedahout4lVears,occ'Head No. 79B. KR Colony, Domlur' tsangalore - 3ou ur I :t AND Hyderabad.

1. State ofTelangana, Represented by Public Prosecutor' High Court' '8,|.,..:,?:",X,.''SiXlo?'ft "13,:.'Slt?.::S[i"::?9133[?'?t?h^i?l?l[3"' n'oi , adnlaianitts. Hyderabad' Telangana' ...Respondent No'2'IDe-facto Complainant in CRLP and l'A'No'1 of 2025 2023 praying that in the Petition under Section 528 of BNSS circumstances stated in tn"'fvf"'""t0" of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the Hiqh court mav be pleased;"';;;;;lh;'larg: sle:l in c c No 464e of 2023 on inJ'irI cni"iilt]ir.o-porit'n rvr'gLtrate at Nampallv' Hvderabad -Act' "i'rrinio't[i"l ! I i E* l.A. NO: 2 oF 2A24 Petition under Section . 528 of BNSS Act, 2023 prayin g that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum ot crounos of crimin;ir i"iiiion, in" High court may be preased to stay a, turtner proceeaings in c.c.No. 4649 ot 2023 on the fite of ilt ,{dditionat Chief Metropolitan'[,t"g,rtrit;"t Nampaily, Hyd;r;bad, pending disposal of the above criminal petition. I.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section.359(6) of BNSS Act, 2023 praying that in the circumdiances stated in the Memorandu- oi crorna.- of criminar petition, the High Court ma.y b,e pleased to permit the petitio;;;;-to fite the quash petition compounding. the non_compoundabte offences against C.C. No 462 b- ;i 2br;--- the fite of ,r Additionar chief Metroporitan naagisiiale ai Nampary, ryoeralai toi the offence Uts 4ZO, 407, 427 lp}. l.A. NO: 2OF 20 25 BETWEEN: Mr. Rqeev.Srndhi, S/o. J.C. Sindhi, Aged about 60 years, Occ. l/anaoino rrrrector ws Sandor Medicaids py1 1fd , ofr;;.i:zl5zbibie?ri ir?i"?lii8ro no.1 . Banjarahills, Hyderabad, Telangana. ... Petitioner /Respondent No.2 AND . g', jf ,,:Jl; F..il?" d'., N *i r,si",f,li 3 ; f ??,.lipi#l l, J?ali: p.ft 3E o' %?li Colony, Dornlur, Bangalore _ Mr. Samj. panda. S/o. Bishnupada pqnda. Aged. 58 years. Occ. Chief operationat officer. criticatog^rnbia FriviiJliniii3il ciJrno and First Ftoor, No. 79B KFI (tolony, DomturlBangator" _ b-ooCiii]-, "'". Mr. Siddarth lvlenon. S/o M,,llll9fl y"l.on, Aged about4l years, Occ. Head Pffi I'lffi ?, B: l"J"Exlsli g'*',#iilg:, #'-,iB rTiP b."il o ;'" o' F i Li HiW,3!j,6isr3l-g1s,I1[l#3qi"ntss:o?3:H5xt,'Ff, t?.p#; No. 798 KR Cotony, Domtur]Bangatore _ SOO Oil.-' - "" 2 3 4 ... Respondents/petitioners Petition uncer Section.359(2) of BNSS Act, 2023 praying that in the circumstances staterl in the Memorandu* oi crtr"o"- of criminar petition, the lnav be pteased to gcorg.lne iorp.ri." io quash the proceedinos in c c No 464e or ?-Ct23 on the fire of ur nooiticlni cni.iHa"tl.pliitr" r,i'rriJ,lJ#?,i Nampalry, Hyderabad against the p"tition"rsirlJrrla" No 1 to 4 by Way of compounding the offences against the petitioner. Hig^lr^Cgurt This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P Vishnuvardhana Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and the additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and of Sri P N Praveen Kumar' Advocate for the ResPondent No 2' The Gourt made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT" JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 i n/and CRIMINAI, PETITION No.l621 7 of2024 COMMO N ORDER: This Criminal petition is filed under Section 52g of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 4 to quash the proceedin-es against them in C.C.No.4649 of 2023 on rhe flle of learned III Acjditional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. It is subrnitted by learned counsel appearing fltr the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that <luring pendency of thc present Criminal petition, the parties have conrpromised the rnatter and accordingly, I.A.Nos. 1 ancl 2 of 2025 have beer.r filed to reoord the compromise between them and to compound the of'fences. t \

3. Vidc or,1:r dated 24.01 .2025, this Courl directecl the parlies along v;ith their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, I{ig.h Court Legal Services.Committee, High ()ourt for the State of 1-era,gana, Hyderabad, for identification ar.rd to submit a report I I 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Coutt, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 21 .01.2025 and the same is placed on record'

5. In view of the above, I.A.Nos.l and 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the pioceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos l to 4 in C.C.No.4649 of 2023 on the file of learued III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// I Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR S CTION OFFICER The lll Additional Chief l\Ietropolitan Magistrate' Hyderabad The Station House Officer, Banjara Hills Police Station' Hyderabad Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad IOUT] Tfie High court t-egal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad One Ct to Sri P Vishnuvardhana Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri P N Praveen Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 1 2 ., 4 E b 7 ADl(kam Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise w HIGH COTJRT DATED:3f l01l201s COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.1 and Z of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.1621t of 2024 1v{r: s l'4?'6 q C 0 { l'lii 2025 f t OSIor,, ALLOWING THE CRLP AND tA.NOs.l & 2 OF ZOZI IN THE HIGII COURT trOR r-HE STAT AT HYDERABAD E OF TELANGANA Crl.P. No. l6 >12- of 20.24 ' 1. Between:- rtrt. irl", Guha S/o' Ramendra Narayan Guha' cliticatog lndia Private Limited' bround and First Floor' No'79B; f. n C"f""V, Domlur' Bangalore - 560 071

2. Mr. Samir Panda S/o' Bishnupada Panda'-- - ;;";, 58 vears, occ: Chief operational officer' Ciiticatog lndia Private Limited' Grornd and First Floor' No' 798' KR Colony' Domlur, Bangalore - 560071

3. Mr. Siddarth Menon S/o' Mukundan Menon' " on"Li",,41 years' occ: Head'tgf Business Development' - Ct'lti"uros lndia Private Limited' ' Cr"r"O Ind First Floor' No' 798' KR Colony' Domlur, Bangalore - 560 071

4. Mrs. Shikha Agarwal Wo' Manoj Agarwal' - nn"o1o"* 4i years'occ: Finance Controller' cliticatog lndia Private Limited' CrornO ind First Floor' No' 79B' KR Colony' Domlur' Bangalore - 560 071 " " "Petitioners/Accused No'1 to 4 AND 1. State of Telangana' RePresented by Public Prosecutor' High Court' Hyderabad. r lvlr. Raieev sindhi, s/o'5L 'Qt*&h' -oo"l,. .6e . ., occ:TtrSBJ,F,E.I*' l/' Nrils Sandor Medicaids Pvt I N o 8-2-326 I 5 I 3F Khairathabad' Hyderabad, Telangana. ...Respondcnt No'2/De-Facto Complainant \ JOINT cOMPR OMISE MEMO It is submil ted that both parties with the inter_vention of elders and well wishers; cf both sides have entered into amicable st:ttiement with the following terms and conditions:_ ,'.' 1) 2l That. the registration .6f the above said crime is fr-rrther causing hurdk: in the personal as well and professionar iife,s of both partres and on the advice of the eiders ana well_wi shers, ths lnd par[, LLas decided to rvithdraw tne complaint against the Petitro nr:rs/Accused No. 1 to 4. That bc,th parties are working professional and Due to the pendency of the criminal "..., _hi"h f_ru"luro". out of complete misun<lerstandings between _re . parties so is causing ' hinderance to personal and professional il.. ;" order to lead peaccful and harmonious social life, with the int.ervention of ,a,d u,e1l_wishers, both parties fr"* a".ia"a to end the :11^.." d iflerences. s) s) 6) That sinr:e the Second party is not interested to pr-osecute the First patlies, in View of the above ""id d;;;;; and therefore no purpose 'will be served, if the First parties are prose,:uted and if the prosecution is continued it is nothing fr"ii r. wasting the valuable Lime of this Honourable Court. That due to the pendency of the criminal case, both the parlies could not able to con< professiorLal lifc,s.," ;-#T,::rtH;.T1":11,*;11j: social life. u,ith the intervention of elders anA *eU_rrisfrers it is deciclecl to end the petty differenc." or That tl-re: second party has instituted the case accusecl cut of misunderstaldings and decided criminal case. Hence the allowinq .l:e above quash pefition. "a it is thererfrtre prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to the cotlpromise and quash the proceedings b-. Way of pounding the offences qrrash the O. 4649 OF 2O23 on the hle of Hon,ble III Additi bnal Chief against the to close the olrjection in agarnst the petitioner in "."o.r"d O".a, i"" "iui" riiJ record o * I Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad against the petitioners/accused no. 1 to 4 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'b1e Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. l I

1. I Mr. Sujoy Guha ] 2, I Mr. Samir Pand

3.I Mr. Sidiiart Menon l

4. Ut/rs. Shi arwal l PETITIONtrRS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4

1.IMr DE FACTO COMPLAINANT hiI Counsel for the Peti'€ettr 6n5P-d'f Counsel for the Petitioner ATTESTED BY ME N,ilo$il- N.\AdAPPA, a'com''u-a ADVOCATE & NOTARY GOW. OF INDIA No. 135, 4th Main Road, 6th Block, Banashankari 3rd Stag€ ird phasl, BENGALURU - s6o 085 1 7 DEC 20zl