The High Court · 2025

2. Smt. Devika Pareek, W/o. Amit Sharma, D/o. B.V. Pareek, Aged 32 years, Occ Private Employee, Presentlv at RYo. E-1908, INDIS PBEL CitY, Landma Ring Rd, Exit - 18, Hyderabad, Telanga Blue Lagoon, Alkapur TownshiP, Telangana-500075 rk - TS Police Academy, Nehru Outer na 500091 Earlier at Fl/o. Villa No.31, Narsingi, Neknampur, Hyderabad, ...Respondent No.2/Defacto complainants Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners / Accused Nos. 1 to 3 in Crime No. 1603 of 2025 of P.S. Narsingi, Cyberabad, dated 14.08.2025 and the C.C. if any arising there from and pending on the Frt( of the Xlll Judicial lVlagistrate of First Class, Cyberabad, at Ra.jendranagar. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that r the circumstances staled in the lt4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. the High Court may be pleased to stay ail further proceedings against petitionr_ r Accused No.1 to 3 in FlR.No 1603 of 2025 on the file of P S Narsingi, Cyberat:: J l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between:

1. Smt. Devika Pareek, W/o. Amit Sharma, D/o. B.V. Parer: . Aged 32 years, Occ Private Employee, Presently at R/o. E-1908, INDIS PBEL City, Landmark - TS Police /,( ademy, Nehru Outer Ring Rd, Exit - 18, Hyderabad, Telangana 500091 Ear r r at R/o. Villa No.3'1 , Blue Lagoon, Alkapur Township, Narsingi, Nek I rmpur, Hyderabad, Tela ngana-500075. ..Petitioner/Respondent No.2 in 1.1,. {os.3 and 4 ot 2025 A.ND 1 The State of Telangana, through the SHO, Narsingi P.S 1ep. by the Pubtic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hy{l ,rabad ...Respondent No.1/ Respondent No.1 in I.A.N< s.3 and 4 ol 2025 2 Anrit Sharma, S/o. J.K. Sharma. Aged 35 years, Occ \ ajor in lndian Army, R/o 139/3, IVD Lines Officer Enclave, Ivlehdipatnan Army Cantonment, Tolichowki, H yd era bad-500008.

3. Seema Sharma, W/o. J-K. Sharma, Aged about 56 y,: rrs, Occ Housewife, R/o 546, Narsi Village, Rajdarbar Spaces, Near Bichpri, Near Sharstripuri, Agra, Uttar Pradesh-282007

4. J.K. Sharma, Aged about 61 years, Occ Retired, R/o 546, Narsi Village, lgidqQar Spaces, Near Bichpuri, Near Sharstripurr, / ,gra. Uttar pradesh 282007 .Respondent Nos.2 to 4/Petitioners in l.A. los.3 and 4 ol 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) R/w 528 of BNSS lraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed along with the lligh Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner herein/Respondent No.2/Dr lacto -Complainant to compound the offences against the Respondent Nos.2 to 4/Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 4 by allowing the Criminal Petition by quashing the proceedings against the Accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No. '1 603 oI 2025 oI P.S. Narsingi, Cyberabad l.A. NO: 4OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) r/w 359(8) r/w 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise entered into by the Petitioner herein Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant and the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein / Accused Nos.'1 to 3 and quash the proceedings against the Accused Nos.'l to 3 in Crime No.1603 of 2025 of P.S. Narsingi, Cyberabad, dated 14.08.2025 and the C.C. if any arising there from and pending on the frle of the Xlll Judicial [,4agistrate of First Class, Cyberabad, at Rajendranagar. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri YEIVIVIGANUR SOMA SRINATH REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and of [v]s Anuradha Cherukuri, Advocate for the Respondent N o.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TI.LANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREI} IIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2O25 IN AND qWt:Qz_! Datet 09.12.2025 Betwee n: Amit Sharntzl and 2 othcrs PetitionersT.i r ctrsccl Nos.1 to 3 AND 'l'hc Srate o[ 1'ci.rngana. through the SI{O, N.l'singi P.S., represcnted by the Public l)rosecutor :rnd another. [?cspondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filc<l by petitioners / acc used Nos. I to 3, seeking to quas.r thc procecdings irr Crime No. I (,03 of 2025 of Narsingi Police Sta r rn rr:gistered lor tlLe o[[e nces u:rder Sections 85, 35 I (2) of the 3 harativa Nyayzr Sanhita. 2O213 (ior short, 'BNS'). '2. Hearcl Mr. Y.Soma Srinath Reddy, Iearncrl <;ot-Lnsel for thc pr-'titioners, Mr.V.Jithender Rao, learned Ar .litional public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of responder:: No.l and Ms. Anuradha Cheruktiri, learned counsel appearrr3 on behaif of rcspondcni No.2. 2 -

3. Learned counsel for tl're petitioners submitted that during the pendency of thc prescnt Criminal Petition at the instance of thc well wishers, relativcs and clders, the partics havc settlcd thc dispute and er-rlercd into compromise and filed Joint Mcmo. Accordingly, the parties hercin have filcd I.A.Nos.3 and 4 ol 2025 lo pcrmit them to compound the offences and to record lhe com promise.

4. Thrs Court uide order, datcd 25. I I .2025, directed lhe parties i.c., the petitioners and rcspondent No.2, to appe ar before the High Court Legal Services Committec, I{yderabad, on or before

02.12.2025. [n compliance ol thc said ordcr, the Secrctary, High Court t egal Services Commitlee, has submitted report, dated

02.12.2025, stating thaL the pctitioners and respondent No.2 were du11, identilied with copics ol their Aadhar C:rrds. It is lurther statcd that the parties i.e. petitioners and respondent No.2 have wiltfully and without any coercion entered into compromise.

5. In view of the said report and also in vierv ol the compromise cntcrcd between the petitioncrs and respondcnt No.2 as rvell as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in Crime No.16O3 of 2025 of Narsingi Police Station, are hereby quashed against the petitioners/ accused Nos.l to 3.

6. Accordingli', the Criminal Petrtion is allor", ct. subjccL to p.1\ rnerlt of costs ol' I?s. i0,0OO/ - (Rupees ten thousr _rcl onh') ro thc High Court LcgaJ Scrvices Committee and Rs.5,O( (7 (Rupccs fivc ll.tor-rs:rnd onlv) 1o thr: Telangana High Court Aclvot.r i:s Associzrtir.rn, Hvrlt:r'abacl, [r1'rltc ltctilioners.',r.ithin one !\,eck frol:] 'rodit\'. \tliscel1:rne ous appiic.rtions, pending il arrr sltall stand c lo st:cl To, SD/- A.JAYASREE TANT REGISTRAR,, - ASSI i //TRUE COPY// qECroN oFFrcER 1 . The Xlll Judicial First Class Magistrate Cyberabad at R.1 Indheranagar. 2. The Station House Officer, Narshingi Police Station, Cyrrr rabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the S'r e of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4 Orre CC to SRI YEI\IN/IGANUR SOMA SRINATH REDL' , Advocate [oPUCi 5 Orre CC to Ms ANURADHA CHERUKURI, Advocate [Ol) ]Cl 6. Two CD Copies along with copy of joint [,4emo is enclosed herew :l Note: An amount of Rs 'l 5,0001 ( Rupees fifteen thousand orr I ) has been paid by Sri Y.Soma Srinath Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioner as dir 'cted by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 09.12.2025 to the "High Court Lega iervices Committee, High Court for the Statr: of Telangana, Hyderabad, and Rs. I t,000L ( Rupees ten thousand onty) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Associr tion, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.147851 of 2025. NVB 6 HIGH COURT JSR,J DATED:0911212025 - COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of ln/And GRLP.No.15486 of 202li;' 202 t::) ll, - FIi. :4, .s.' ,S. \" \ 't]i o, \.." i it'.t',1 + ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION l\tlD l.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2025 \ II ---- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I.A. No. of2025 Crl.P. No. of 2025 lGrtu Between: Smt. I)evika Pareek, Wo. Amit Sharma, D/o. B.V. Pareek, Aged 32 years, Occ; Private Employee, Prescntl R/o. E-1908, INDIS PBEL City, Landrnark - TS Poiice Acadcmy,, Nehru Outer Ring Rd, Exit - 18, Hyderabad,'lelangana 50009 I Ear'lier at R/o. Villa No.31, Blue Lagoon, Alkapu r Torvnship, Narsingi, NcknaLnpr-rr, I 11 dcrabad. Tclangana-500075. . . Petitior-rer'/Respondent trr-o. 2 AI{D The Stale of Telangana, through the SHO, Nar:singi P.S., Rcp. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Ielangana at Hyderabad. . . .Respondent No. 1i Respondent No. 1

2. Arnit Shanna, S/o. J.K. Shanna, Aged 35 years, Occ: Major in Indian Army, R/o. 139i3, MD Lines Officer Enclave, Mehclipatnam, Arn'ry Cantonment, Tolichorvki, Hyderabad - 500008.

3. Seema Sharma, Wo. J.K. Shar:rna, Agcd about 56 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. 546, Narsi Village, Rajdarbar Spaces, Near Bichpuli, Near Sharstripuri, Agra, Uttar Pradesh -282007;

3. J.K. Sharma Aged about 61 years, Occ: Retired, R/o. 546, Narsi Village, Rajdarbar Spaces, Near Bichpuri, Near Sharstripuri, Agra, Uttar Pradesh - 282007; Respondent Nos.2 to 4/Petitioners JOINTMEMO --

1. It is submitted that tl'Le Petitioner herein had filed a cor ir rlaint and the sarne was rcgistercd as l-LR No. 1603 of 2025, datedl4.0S.2() .5 oIP.S. Narsingi, Cyberabad against thc Respondcnt Nos.2 to 4 herein / l) rtitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 3 and fbl thc ofl'ences rurder scc. 85,351(2) anLl I & 4 DPA.

2. it is rcspectfirlly subtnitled that the present matter arises ( Lrt ola matrimonial dispute betlvcenPetition cl helcin ancl thc Respondent I io.2 herein. At the instance of thc elclers. thc clispr-rtcs have been arnicably, I 3ltled out cif Courl- In tight of this seLtlement, I)etitioner herein and thr Respondent No.2 hereinhave nlutlrally agleed to obtain divorce by niutual r cnsent and both the parlie:; and their' laLr,ilics decided to r,r,ithch alv the crintir Lr I cases filcd by ancl against each other'. fheretbrc, keeping rhe matter penil rg would selvc no purpose, palticularlv u,hen the Petitioner / Responcli:r t No.2 / Defacto- Con-rplainanL is not inclined to pursue thc case any lxfth()l

3. In vicw of tlre above t-acts ernd circumstances, tl: continuation o1' procecdings against tlrc Respondcnt Nos,.2 to 3/Petitionr:. s/Accused Nos- I to 3 pursuant to the FIR No. 1603/2025, dated 14.08.202i of P.S. Narsingi, Cyberabad will not ser\c any purpose and hence desirabI to be closed.

4. Hence, this Joint Memo. ',/,/ ,,!. It is therefore prayed that this llon'ble court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner herein / Respondent N.o.2 / Defacto complainant to compound and cotnpromise offences with the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein / petitioners / Accr-rsed Nos. I to 3 by allowing tlie criminal petition by quashing the ploccedirrgs againstthe AccusedNos. 1 to 3 incrime No. 1603 o12025 of p.S. Narsingi, cybe'abad, dated 14.08.202-5 and ttre c.c. if any arising trrercfi-orn. and pending on thc file of the Iton'ble XIII Judicial Magistrate ol Fir.st class, cyberabad, at Raje,dranagar and pass snch other order and orders as this LIon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Place: Ilyderabad Date: .11.2025 Petitioner,lRespondent No.2/Defacto-complainant \ iu.f ^&)r-'-- Counsel Ibl Petitionel'Respondcnt No.2/Defacto-complainant Respondent No.2/Petitioner No. 1/Accused No. 1 I 1* NSJ D Respondent No.3/Petit loner o 2/Accused No.2 / Respondent No.4/Petitioner No. 3/Accused No.3 Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 4lPetitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3