✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

Criminal Petition No. 388 of 2011 · Andhra Pradesh High Court

Criminal Petition No. 388 of 2011K C BHANU

Case at a glance

Bench
K C BHANU

Outcome

Allowed

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed quashing

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed quashing the proceedings C.C.No.449 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional I Class Magistrate, Warangal. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. _​ ​_______________ K.C.BHANU, J DATED: 26-12-2012 Hsd ​

Judgment

This petition is filed by the petitioners-A1 to A7 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.449 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional I Class Magistrate, Warangal, which was taken cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 498-A IPC and 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’).

2.

2nd respondent-complainant is present. She produced savings bank account pass book issued by Andhra Bank, which shows her identity. She is also identified by her counsel. She stated that at the intervention of elders, the matter has been amicably settled and she has no objection proceedings against the petitioners. The offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC is compoundable, whereas the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act are minor than that of offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC. In view of the fact that the matter has been settled out of Court amicably and the offences are compoundable, there is no impediment to quash the proceedings. to quash

Operative part

3.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed quashing the proceedings C.C.No.449 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional I Class Magistrate, Warangal. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. _​ ​_______________ K.C.BHANU, J DATED: 26-12-2012 Hsd ​

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed quashing

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 388 of 2011). ← Search more judgments