✦ High Court of India · 25 Nov 2025

Mrs. Nikhat Sultana v. 1. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Nov 2025
Length
1,466 words

13. Mr. Nawaz, S/o.Not known to petitioner, Aged about :15 years, Occ ;Business, Flat No.'101, Hussains pride Enclave, plot"No.l t Opp itenaif e nc'a-OemV,- Suncity, Band Iaguda Jagir, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Artrcle 226 ot rhe constitution of ln i a praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, th. High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction. nr, re p;:rticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of thr: lespondent Nos.3 to 6 in failing to consider the Represenlation of the petitiorr :r, Dt 0B-10-2025 for grant of Protection to the petitioner and her Famrly Memb: s to protect their life and liberty and to the Prope(y of the petitioner bean.r ; Door Numbers 4- 299t124tjct66t2, 4_299t124t5ct66, 4-2ggt124tSCt67. 1 299t12415C16611 in Sy.No.124lRU situated at situated at Gopanpalli Viltir re, S herilingampally Mandal,Ranga Reddy District from the hands of Responrl,; rts 7 to .1 3 and their henchmen as illegal, arbitrary, Un Constitutional and viotirr on of Arlicle 14. 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequen y direo t re Respondents 3 to 6 to forthwith consider the grant of protection to the petj.i rner and her Family Members and to her Property bearing Door Numbers .: 199/1 24ls cr66r2, 4- 29911241sc166. 4-299t1241sc16t, 4-2gg/124/sc/66/1 in Sy No 124lRU situated at situated at Gopanparri Vi age, Sheriringampaly Mandar t anga Reddy District from the the hands of Respondents 7 to 13 and ther henchmen by duly considering the Representation of the petitioner, Dt.0B_.1 0_20 5. l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition under section 15'1 cpc praying that in the cr ( Jmstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petitron, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondents 3 to 6 to forthwith consrder the grar tof protection to the Petitioner and her Family lVlembers and to her property beari ,q Door Numbers 4_ 29911241sc16612, 4-2991124lsc/66, 4-2sgt124rscr6r, ,t ., 99r124rscr66r1 rn Sy.No-'124/RU situated at situated at Gopanpalli Village, She- ingampally [\.ilandal, Ranga Reddy District from the hands of Respondents 7 to i: rnd their henchmen by duly considering the Representation of the petitioner, Dr.l l-10- 2025 pending disposal of the above wrrt petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI C.HARI PREETH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 to '13 : - The Court at the stage of admission made the following OROER /,/ THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAV l N KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.35810 of 2025 ORDER: Hearcl learned counsel for the petitioner and llarned Assistant Govcrnment Pleader for Home appearing for respondcn Nos.1 to 6. With thcir consent this writ petition is taken up for disposal at I r : aclmission stage itself 2- This writ pctition is filed seeking following Praycr:- "to declare tlrc nction of the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 tt cottsirler the llepresentation of the Petitioner Dt 08.11 grnnt of Protection Lo the Petitioner and her Family A4 protect thtir lit'e and liberty and to the Property of tltt benring Door Nttmbers 4-299/124/SC/662, 4-299/'124/ 299/124/5('/67, 4-299/124/SC//66/1 in Sy No.124,41U, s Gopnnpalli Villnge, SlrcriliryanLpnlly Mandnl, Rnr;5 District, ftom tlrc hnnds of Respondents 7 to 73 nncl thLit ns illegal, nrbitrary, Un Constitutiorul and ttiolation of t 21 and 300A of Constitution of lndia and consequenllt Respondents 3 to 6 to forthtoith consider the grant of P t tlrc Petitioner md her Fnmily lt\embers and to her Prrtytt:, Door Ntrnhers 4299/124/SC/66/2, 4-299/124/'j( 2e9/124/5q67, 4-299fl24/SC/66/1 in Sy No.724/RU, s Copnrynlli Villnge, Sherilinytnpally Mnndal, Rar'5 District lrom tfu hands of Respondents 7 to 13 antl thau by duly c.otrsdering the Representntion of tlr P,'li 08.70.2025 " fniLittg to 2025 for 'nbers to )etitioner ',c/66, 4- tuntcd tt t Rtddt1 vnchnrctt rticle 74, lirect the tactiott to 11 betring /66, 4- trLrttctl tt t Redthl tcttclunen ;oner Dt

3. Brief facts statecl in this writ petition are that the pe i ioner claitns to bc tlre owner and possessor of house bearing Nos.4-29!r, 124 /SC/ 66 /2, 1- 299 / 124 / SC / 66, 4-299 / L24 / sC / 67, 4-299 / 124 / SC / 66 / L i L Sy' No.1 24l RU, situated at Gopanpalli Village, Sherilingampally Man.1 Ll, Ranga Rerld-v District, having actluired the same tfuough registcrcd rale cleed bearing docurnent No.18421 of 2013 clated 1,6.1,22013. The casc crf tl' : petitioncr is thtrt i i l F\ \ '2 on 23.12.2024, respondent Nos.7 to 13 wittl an interltion to grab the subject property started interfering with the petitioner's peaccful possession over the subject property, hence, petitioner rodged a complaint .n 23.72.2024 and FIR No.2038 of 2024 dated 24.72.2024, rcgisterecl urrclcr Scctio.s 329(3) and 351(2) of BNS. It is furthcr subn'ritted that thr. rcsp..dcnt Nos.7 to 13 again trespassed the subject property ancr threaterrcd thc pctitr..cr a.d hcr farniry members with dire consequences. Thereaf ter, petitioncr firccr suit for perpe tual injunction i.e., o.s.No.196 of 2025 and thc. rearnetl Sc.ior Civir Judge-Cum- Assistant sessions Judge, Ranga Rcdci' District, r,rrlc intcrim ordcr dated

21.07.2025 in I.A.No.620 of 2025 in o.s No.19(r of 2025, gr:r.tctl Ad-rnrerim iniunction and restrained respondents No.7 to 13 irr,, i^terfering rvith the petitioner's pcaceful possession over the subject proper.ty apti 1ir7c ordcr ciated

07.77.2025, the interim order dated 24.07.2025 was cxtendccl till 77.'lz.2o2s. Inspite of the Ad-Interim injunction order, respondcnt Nos.7 to 13 interfered with thc petitioner's peaceful possessicn ovcr thc subjcct propgrty, hcnce, petitioner made a representation and requcsted responcicnt authorities to protect the petitioner and her family rncmbers anci takc action against respondent Nos.7 to 13. Howevcr, till clate thc samc is pcntling for consiiieration. Aggrievcd by thc sarnc, this r,r,rit pctition is filetl.

4. Learned Assista.t Govcrnmcnt preadcr f<lr Home appeari.g for respondent Nos.1 to 6 submits that pctitioner's rcprcsentatiorr was received on

08.1,0.2025 and further submits that thc sarnc w.ulcl bc corrsiclerecl and the rcspondent authorities would take appropriate action in accorclancc r.r,ith law. t I (l /' -)

5. Recording thc submissions madc bv the learnecl c r rnsel :rppearing on either sicie, this ,,vrit pctition is clisposed of dircct r g the res;ronclcnt authoriiies to cor]siclcr the pctitioner,s representation (lr cc{ 08.10.2025 and grant police prot('ction to thc petitioncr and hcr famill, rru mbcl orr nccd a ntl neccssitl' basis. lt is also madc clear that thc responrlL,r t arrthoritics sl.ra Il coopcrate rvith thc petitioner in implementing the rrrt :rim orcler datccl

24.07.2025 passcd in L A.No.620 of 2025 in O.S.No.196 of 2( ri

6. Acco.di^glr', tl-ris *'rit petition is disposed rl. N4iscclrtr.c.us applications, if anY pcr.rcling, sl-rall stand closed. No order I to (osts. //TRUE COPY// SD/-C. DEEPIKA AS: ISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To \ I SA

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretarr. t State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. The Director General of Police, Hyderabad, Telangan: itate 3. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Telangana St lte. 4. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madhapur Zone, ( yberabad. 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, [\Iadhapur Divi:;t rn, Cyberabad. 6. The Station House Officer, Gachibowli, Cyberabad. 7. Two CCs to GP FOR HO[/E, High Court for the State r Telangana at 8. One CC to SRI C.HARI PREETH, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. [OUT] HIGH COURT DATED:2511112025 I ORDER WP.No.35810 of 2025 ,,./-:-,' .\ ). B 3 t:C 7l.l25 li'. \1. 1 .i! DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS.

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments