The High Court · 2025

fhe.Chairqal, Special Court, Constituted under A.P. Land Grabbing (p) Act, Tankbund Ro?d, Hyderabad. Smt. (ancherlg Navaneetha, Wo Kumara Swamy, Housewife Fl/o, H. No.2-g- 55, Jangaon, Warangal District. (f,lote: Respondent No.'1 is not necessary party) ..,PETITIONEBS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to LGC No.25 of 2OOS on the file of tfrq Special Court constituted under A.P.L.G (P) Act, Hyderabad and quash the ...RESPONDENTS Judgment dated 12 8.11010 in LGC No.25 of 2005 by issuing writ rrf certiorari or any other appropriate \rVrit, Order or direction of the like nature' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Qetition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in ;rpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased t9 record the terms of cotnpromise signed by both the parties and enciosed hereto' Ceunsel for the Petitionql : SRI BANKATLAI" MANDHANI QqUnsel for the Respondent l'{o.1 : GP FOR REVENUF Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 : SRI S.BALCHAND Thq Cqurt made the following: ORDER t \ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. I'INOD KT]MAR And TIIE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P,SREE SUDHA I.A.No.1 of 2025 In/and WRIT PETITION No.26601 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Smt. Justice P.Sree Sudh.a) Petitioner No.4 present and he represents petitioner Nos.l to 3, who are his father, mother and matemal aunt. Respondent No.2 also present.

2. Both parties have stated that an amount of Rs.40,00,000/- was given by way of Demand Drafts, as detailed in para -4 of the terms of compromise filed along with LA.No.l of 2025,by petitioner No.4 to respondent No.2 and she received the same Both parties intend to compromise the matter as per the compromise deed entered into between them, which was also signed by the parties and the learned counsels representing them.

3. Therefore, the compromise entered into between the petitioners and respondent No.2 is recorded. I.A.No.1 of 2025 is ordered. 2

4. In terms of the compromise entered into betwe':n the petitioners and respondent No.2, the Writ Petition is dispor;ed of. No costs

5. As a ser1,rel, miscellaneous petitions pending if an'r shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.S. MALLI KARJUNA RAO REGISTRAR AS ,1 TSTANT SECTION OFFICER hairma n , Special Court, Constituted under und Ro ad, H bad. (With records if anv) C to SRI BA LAL MANDHANI , Advocate. [OPUC Cs to GF FOR R EVENUE, High C ourt for the Slate of l elangana NKAT Land Grabbing (P) Act, I 9n" QC to SRI S BALCHAND, Advocate. [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies *itf, a r,c,py of the Corlpromise Deed to this Judgment) To, I 2 J The C Tankb One C Two C Iourl SpS BS 'i,. ;.4: r,'-,' ,..j.rr:r*la rri. _._i 3-. { :1 I] HIGH COURT DATED:'1010312025 q o o 1 nE ST47, (,i 1O APR ZI25 I DFSpnrCtrf t * I I f i C JUDGMENT t.A.No.1 OF 2025 IN/AND W.P.NO: 26601 OF 2010 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS / 4,/ 2 _- - .:....'. f --'1&. ".3i w IN THE HIGH COI]RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA trT'IIYDERABAI} W.P. No. 26601 OF20t0 BETWEEN: t f. Lgryra Reddy, Slo. Venkatram Reddy Aged abut 83 years, Occ: Agriculhue

2. Smt..B. Rajya'Laxmi,Wo L:a*rna Reddy Aged abou! 78 years, Occ: Housewjfe

3. Smt. G Anuradha,Wlo: MadhavhReddy, Aged about 70 years, Occ: Household

4. B, Ravinder Redcly, S/o. Laxma Reddy, Aged about 6l years, Oic: Teacher All are R/o H. No. 2-10-77,BehindBus Depo! Jangaon, Warangal District. \

5. D, Slihari.S/o. Jayammulu, Aged 72 years, Occ: Business, R/o H. No. 2-9-91, Jangaon, Warangal District AND . . .. Petitioners l.The Chairman, Special Court, Constituted underA.p. Land Grabbing @) Act, II Floor, BRKR Govt Offices Complex, Tankbund Road Hyderabad. '

2. Smt. Kancharla Navaneeth a,Wlo.late K. Kumara Swamy, Agedabout 48 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o H. No. 2-9-55, Jangaon, Warangal District. . . .. Responderrts (NOTE: Re pondent No.. I is not ne cessary party) / \ ( .t u K'!6{sr' \.- e Cc g a TERMS OF'CO]VPR@MISE T,NDER ORDER 23 RULE 3OF CPC 9 The above-narred parties humbly submit as under:

1. That Respoent No.2 herein, filed LGC No.25 of 2005 and'the same was allowed vide Orders dated 12.08,.2010 diiecting'f!,itio.t"tt herein to hanrlover possession,of363 Square Yards in Sy. lJo. 9414 of, Jangaon Mandal and District and hggrieved thereby, the Petitioners prefened W.P No.26601 of 2,AfibeforetheHon'ble l{igih Court. flr: /

2. At the insiance of elders and well-wishers, the parties her':to have settled their dispute on the following terms:

3. It is submitted that, to amicably settle the dispute, the Fe titioners herein agreecl to pay Rs.40,00,000 (Rupees Forty Lakhs only) towards compensation and resolution of all disputes and the Respondent No. 2 herein agreed to receive the same, towards consideration flrr settlement of dispute and the same was rec orded in Order dated 08.01.2025 in the present Writ Petition.

4. That Respondent No.2 received Rs.20,00,000/- @upees Twenty Lakhs only) by way of Demand Draft No.238754 dated 24-01-2025 drawn on SBI Bank, Jangaon Branch hereby acknowledge thti receipt of the same. The balance amount of Rs,20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Laldrs onty) is also received by the Respondent No. Ir) by way of Deman Draft No. 238783 dated 10-0 -2025 drawn oniSI] /y ? P --r'y'9 (^ 4 L1 I 5, /ob'Aj IBank, t<.A{tur It-:;t;-.;.i,* _-.-,--- ,i -i5 Jangaon Branch, in terms of Order dated 0g.0i.2025 passed in this . < Writ Petition. Q::, 5. In view ofthe above settlement that arrived between the parties, the Respondent No. 2 hereby admits the title and adverse possession of W{t Petitioners No. I to 4 in respect of 363 Square yards in Survey No. 9414 of Jangaon Mandal and District.

6. The Petitioner do hereby admit that, the Respondent No.2 is the owner and possessor of land in Sy. No. 94/4 of Jangaon Mandal and District situated abutting western side of the compound wall of the Petitioner's petrol Bunk. It is therefore prayed that the Hon,ble Court may be pleased to rEcord the compromise in the above terms and close the writ Petition in the interest ofjustice and pass such other order/s as may be deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. #^P Peti I Petitioner No. 2 b*,2' Petitioner No. 5 6j---A** Counsel For petitioners h^ etitioner No. 3 petitioner No 4 B /{s RESPONDENTNO.2 Counsel For Respo No.2 /'t- € F€,I \ t*a r -FE c ,rqtS ?oc\".\ b\) )- r2 .fr. HIGHCOURT WRITMISC.PEIMI q I.A.NO. w.P.NO. J oF 2025 1 0F 2010 D4\r q -) 19 !\ oc) S/ARANGAI DISTRTCT B.Laxma Reddy and others ... Petitioner/s \o F Lt .P( -/1,i"' j By Sri Banktalal Mandhani (4819) Sri Ghanshyamdas Mandhaui Advocate Counsel for the petitioner NATURE OFAPPLICATION a/o 23 RULE 3 R/W SE(1. 151 C.P.C.) This I{on'ble Court may be pleased to record the terms of compromise signed by- both the i parties and enlcosed hereto and pass orders in terms of compromise in the interest of justice. . PRESENTED ON:2\ -02-20,15 F.EPRESENTED ON: FrLED ON:21-02-2025 'h Ioe T 0 ,ss], |r,: i l.l * (., Or- (L c9 .+ ?, *