✦ High Court of India · 24 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Feb 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,183 words

Petition under section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner in c.c.No.B63 of 2022 on the file of the court of 'the XV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana state which arose out of crime No 23b ol 2022 of lbrahimpatnam police station, .Rachakonda Police Commissionerate. l.A. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under section 528 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition,the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the Petitioner on the file of the Court of the XV Additionat Metropolitan in i.C t{o.AO: of Magistrate, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State which.arose out of crime No.238 of 2022 of lbrahimpatnam Police station, Rachakonda Police commissionerate, Pending disposal of the quash petition before this Honourable court. '2O22 l.A. NO: 3 oF 2024 & 4 of 2O24: Between: Kothamasu Mudiray, R/o T,G. B.!q'r9a_vr. D/o. Prabhaka r, Age: 2.1 years, Occ: S;tudent, Caste: Siri3i Puram Viilage, Maheshrialrm Manori, FJiga"iieooy District, ...PETITIONER/DEFACTO-tOMPLhINANf ' AND -felangana, 1 The State of Hyderabad. progg,culor High Court, ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT' 2. Guda Praveen S/o yarljriah, Age:27 years, Occ. Electrician, ()aste; Mudiraj, u,r/1, Sirigi puram Viilase,'rvrihurn*rrm vrrall,-ni'rlr'iiEiiov Rep. by its p_ublic^ - $r,,&r,lf,\:d ,..RESPONDENT/ACCUSED Petition under {iection.35g{6) of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the petitior, the High court may oe'pteaseo to permit *,. p"iii.r"rr Defacto-compraina nt t. compound the oifence with the accused who are the Petitioners in crr.p.No 16104 12024 on tne rite oilhi, nonorrrotr,'nigh b,.r.t, which filed to quash the proceedings in c.c.No. ios or 2022 on the file of the Court of the XV Aclditional MetrJpolitan fr,rgi.lrt", lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District rerangana state which ,ro"u o"rt ot crir" No 23il of 2022 of lbrahimpatnam police station, Rachakonda potice Commissionerate l.A. NO:4 oF 2024 Petition under [iection 35g(2) of cr.p.c praying that in the ci,cumstances stated in the petitiol a.rd affidavit arongwith.roint-i,leiro, the High c"rii'.lv o" pleased to record corrp.omise and peririt tne feiiionerl Defacto-comprainant to compound the offence with the respondents/accused who are the p"[tion"i. in crl.P.No.16r04t2o24 or. the fire oitt'ir ionoi"l-ourt which fired t,: quash the proceedings in c.c.N. 863 0f 2022 0n the fire of the court of the XV Additionar Metropolitan Magistrate, rbrahimp^atnam nrn!" n"ooy District rli""g".r'.Lt" which arose out of rr)rime No.23B ot zoii'u rb-rahimpatnam porice station, Rachakonda Police Crtmmissionerate This Petition anrl IAs coming on for hearing, upon pr:rusing the Mem'orandum of Grounds of criminar pltition and upon hearing the a.guments of sri Dr. charra srinivasa Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner and th<> Additionar Public Prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and of sri Muthyara Venkatesh Guna, Advo,:ate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the foilowing: COMMON ORDER I j I I t HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos .3 and4o f 2024 in/a nd CRIMINAL PETI TION No.16104 of 2024 coMMON ORDER: This Criminal petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner herein to quash the proceedings against him in C C.No.863 of 2022 on the file of learned XV Additional [\4etropolitan t\4agistrate, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner herein as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences

3. Vide order dated 10.02.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the secretary, High court Legar services committee, High court for the state of rerangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, Hlgh Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 1A.02.2025 and the same is placed on record. I I 2 E ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024 are allowed Consequently, this Criminal petiticin is allowed and the proceeding:; against the petitioner herein in C.C No.863 of 2022 on the file rtf learned XV Additional t\4etropolitan Magistrate, lbrahimpatnanr, Ranga Reddy District, are hereby quasherd A/iscellareous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/- A. SRINIVASA REDDY AS{STANT REGISTRAR Secrroru oFFrcER

1. The XV Additicnal Metropolitan Magistrate, Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy

2. The Station House Officer, lbrahimpatnam Police station. Rachakonda District. Police Comm ssionerate at Hyderabad. IOUTI

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana 4. One CC to Sri lf r. Challa Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate [OpUC] 5. One CC to Sri f\4uthyala Venkatesh Guna, Advocate [OpUC] 6. Two CD Copies \ To, (Along with ,3 ,lopy of Joint Memo of Compromise) kam/gh 1p ! o o HE SI4 k- 1 2 6 tlAB 2025 rt bisr,,:.t a\A'; '-j ----')?'- HIGH COURT DATED:2410212025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2024 in/and CRLP.No.16104 ot 2024 BOTH l.As AND CR|M|NAL PETITION ARE ALLOWED I af , 20 CRL.P.No. OF 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD BETWEEN: Guda Praveen, S/o. Yadaiah, Age 27 years, Occ: Electrician, Caste; Mudiraj r R/o. H.No'. 7-62/L, Sirigi Puram Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, T.G.; / / ? And

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High court, Hyderabad. ....RESPON DENT/COMPLAINANT

2. Kothamasu Bhargavi, D/o. Prabhakar. Age: 21 years; Occ: Student Caste: Mudiraj, R/o. Sirigi Puram Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, T.G.; ' ...... RESPONDENT /DEFACTO_COMPLAINANT JOINT M EMO

1. The Petitioner herein filed quash petition to euash the proceedings in C.C.No. 863/2022 on the file of the Court of :he XV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District Telangana state which arose out of Crime No 23812022 of Ibrahimpatnarrr Police station, Rachakonda police / Commissionerate. The Petitioner anci the 2nd respondent have compromise out of court and the defacto complainant who is the 2^d respondent in the petition also filed affidavit and petition to compound the offences, hence this memo. 2. It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to receive this joint memo and compound the offence and pass such other order or orders in the circumstances of the case. )r*r+4 Petitidner /Accused ,VW' / 2nd responEent/Defacto-complainant HYDERABAD DATE:20-L2-2024 COUNSEL FOR THE PETMONER /tt- t4-14.- COUNSEL FOR THTRESPON Df,NT

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments