Judicature Of Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 437, 439
Judgment
The State of A.P., Rept. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad. .....Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner / accused No. 4 on bail, pending enquiry and trial in C.C.No. 13 of 2006 on the file of the Hon'ble District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam arising out of Crime Nos. 43, 45 and 80 of 2005 of R.Pet Police Station, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.Radha Krishna, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the Court made the following. //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
The District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam 2. The Station House officer, R Pet Police Station, Machilipatnam, Krishna District
The Superintendent, District Jail, Vijayawada, Krishna District 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)
One CC to Sri M.Radha Krishna, Advocate (OPUC)
One Spare Copy Ab HIGH COURT REJ DATE: 23-3-2011 ORDER CRL.P.N O. 2374 OF 2011 BAIL HIGH COURT AB DRAFTED ON 24-3-2011 REJ DATE: 23-3-2011 ORDER CRL.P.N O. 2374 OF 2011 BAIL
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 437, 439.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Mar 2011. The bench was RAJA ELANGO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.