The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not implementing the orders of the Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 5602 of 2005, dated 12-2-2018, as confirmed by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in W.A, No. 305 of 2010 dated 21-3-2022 as being illegal and consequently direct the respondents to implement the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 5602 of 2O10 dated 12-2-2OO8 as confirmed in W.A. No. 305 of 2O1O I T 1 i j I ! II II lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to implement the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 5602 of 2010 dated 12-2-2008 as confirmed in W.A. No. 305 of 2010, forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MUKHRAM KHAN, COUNSEL REPRESENTING FOR SRI D BALA KISHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - | The Court made the following: ORDER -.t1 w IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICi PUI,IE I(ARTHIK WRIT PETITION o.35726 OF 2025 THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER, T1[IO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE Between: Smt.Geetha Rai. AND ...Petitioner The District Educational Officer Nizamabad and 3 others. ORDER: .Respondents With the consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: "...to i.ssue a Writ, order or direction more partiatlarlg one in tlrc noture of Writ of Mdndamus declaring tlrc action of tlrc respondents in not implementing ttrc orders of the Hon'ble Court in W.P..No.5602 of 2005, dated 12-2-2018, as onfirmed by the Diuiston Bench of thi"s Hon'ble Court in W.A.No.3OS of 2O1O dated 21-3-2022 as being illegat and ansequentlg dired tfn respondents to implement the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P-No.56O2 of 2O1O dated 12-2-2OO8 as conftnnedin W.A.No.305 of 2010 and poss..." v-4 I ! i i I i 2 PK,J wp_35726_2025

3. Heard Mr.Mukhram Khan, learned counsel representing Mr.D.Bala Kishan Rao, learn:d counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Service.;-i -"r: th.e respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier' filed w.P. No.5602 of 2o0s seeking sanction of family pension and other death benefits consequent upon the death of her husband, duly counting the service rendered by him from the date of his first appointment i.e.,

28.06.1989 and the said writ Petition was disposed of by order dated 12.o2.2oo8 directing the respondents to count the service rendered by the petitioner's husband w.e.f. 28.o6.L989 for the purpose of pension/family pension and other consequential benefits. Aggrieved thereby, the respondents preferred w.A. No.305 of 2010 and the Division Bench of this court dismissed the said writ Appeal uidejudgment dated 21.03.2022. As such, the petitioner submitted a representation to respondent No.4 on

03.06.2022. Respondent No.4, in turn, forwarded the representation to respondent No.l uideletter dated 07.06.2022. However, no action has been taken by respondent No.l so far. i - , ,i,,] 3 PK,J Wp_35726-2025 Therefore, learned counsel prays this Court to direct respondent No.1 tc consider the petitioner's representation dated

03.06.2022 anrd the letter dated 07.06.2_022 forwarded by respondent No.4 for implementation of the order dated

12.02.2008 passed in W.P. No.56O2 of 2005, as confirmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.305 of 2O1O by judgment dated

21.03.2022, within a time-frame to be stipulated by this Court.

5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents fairly submits that respondent No.1 will consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.06.2022 and. the letter dated 07.06.2022 forwarded by respondent No.4, in accordance I I with law.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated

03.06.2022 submitted by the petitioner, along with the letter dated 07.06.2022 forwarded by respondent No.4, for implementation of the order dated 12.O2.2OO8 passed in W.P. No.56O2 of 2005, which was confirmed by the Division Bench in , :lr 1,:.. 1::-t: .,,, 1. , ,, ,. 1 ]l ': ],,!i : : _1. .1_.;--:.driii:r{, +18 ' 1. .... ..,.r!--i.l?d nE;!iiil ' :. . -: :.,r:i r€siL9F,g:tet 4 PK,J Wp*35726_2025 w.A. No.305 of 2010 by judgment dated 21.03.2022, stricrly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferabry within a period of eight (8) weeks from tl-re oate of receipt of a copy of this order. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ -P. PONNA KRISHNA NT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The District Educational Officer, Nizamabad 2. The Commissioner and Director, of School Education, State of Telarigana, Hyderabad .

3. principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

4. The Secretary and Correspondent, Adarsh Hindi Vidyalaya lnstitutions, Nizamabad.

5. One CC to SRI D BALA KISHAN RAO, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES - l, High Court for the State of Telangana.

7. Two CD Copies PVL GJp pk- HIGH COURT DATED:08/1 212025 \ \ ORDER WP.No.35726 of 2025 TH: S )h {f. EEC TW ,, ,J I I 1 "+ * l.) t-. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \o rt[frd W : ,.'. :r:....' : :..:.:i::;ll;i,;,.i