Dr. Padmasree Dream Project Pvt Ltd v. Shri Ramesh Gaikwad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
Cause title
Dr. Padmasree Dream Project Pvt Ltd, A Company lncorporated Under The 9ompanies Act, 1956, Having its registered office at 37-1261111, Sricolony, leredrye! X road, Hyderabad Rep. by its Chairman and [/anaging Director Dr. Pitia Sreen Raj AND ... PETITIONER
/Plaintiff Shri Ramesh Gaikwad, S/o. Hanumantha Rao Aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. 8-4-54913811, Netajinagar, AG Colony, Yerragadda, Hyderabad. ..RESPONDENT
/Defendant Counsel for the Petitioner : SRt. VIJAY B PAROPAKARI Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the fotlowing: ORDER () IN THE, HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEId,NGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA C.R.P.No.4243 pf 2025 Betrveen: Dr. Padrnasree Dream l)roject Pvt Ltd, l Petitioner-plaintiff ANT) . . . Respondent-De[cndant t a Sri l(:lrncsh ()ai lvar{
ORDER:
lr.r r.icn of thc orders passed in CRp No.4240 o[ 2025, datecl 28-11.2()?5, Iear:ned cr>unscl For thc petitioner: seeks permission of this Court to r.r'ithdrarv th: (livil ltevision Petition with liberty ro rhe petitioner ro pursue his rcrncdies bt fore thc rrial Court.
2. Permissicn is accorded
Operative part
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid litrertl,. 'rhere shall be no order as to costs. I 2 Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this petition, shall stand closed Sd/. P.C. SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY//
The 1"tAddl. District and Sessions Judge-cum-Addl. Family Court Special Sessions Judqe.[Or [JC the cases relaiing to atrocities ag'ainst women at ^ Kushaiguda U'eOi6at-tvlalki; giri Oistr, ict 2. One CC to SRl. vtJAy B pARopAKARt Advocate [opuc] 3. Two CD Copies -.'v -- -'-' GE/PSL TlL' I To, I t \ HIGH COURT DATED:28t11t2O25 C) lHE S t 16 r'tB Zl]Zti : ?.. * ORDER CRP.No.4243 of 2025 DISMISSING I'HE CRP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS ,lj
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.