1. Genamooni Ramulu v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue direction, directing the respondents No. 2 to 4 to consider the representations of t petitioners dt. 1 1-1 1-2025 and 12-11-2025 by cancelling the mutation affected in the name of the 5th respondent in respect of the land in Sy.Nos.Sy.No.460, admeasuring Ac.05-2C gts.sub Sy.No.460/UU/,1, admeasuring Ac.O2-2O gts., Sy.No.460/U, admeasuring Ac.01-00 gts., Sy.No.460/UUi2, admeasuring Ac.01-00 gts., and Sy.No.460/EE, admeasuring Ac.0'l-OO gts. situated at Nallavelly Revenue Village, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the will petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI CHILPIREDDY NARSTREDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : SRI H.RAKESH KUMAR, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : - The Court made the following ORDER I THE HONOURABLE SRi JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL ORDER: This writ Petition is liled seeking the following relief:- "...to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the representation of the petitioners, dated 11.11.2o2s and 12.1L.2025 requesting not to entertain any application for mutation in favour of respondent No.5 in respect of the land of in SyNo.460 admeasuring Acs.05.20 guntas (Sub Sy.No.46O IUU /1 admeasuring Acs.O2.2O guntas; Sy.No. 460/U admeasuring Ac.O1.00 guntas; Sy.No.460 /UUl2 admeasuring Ac.O1.O0 guntas and Sy.No.a6O/EE admeasuring Ac-o1-o0 guntas situated at Nalavely Revenue Village, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and also violation of Articres 14, 2l and 3ooA of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to entertain any application for recording the Boddu Purshotham Reddy name as pattadar in the dharani portal and for issuance of new e-digital pattadar pass book-cum-title deed in respect of the said land and pass..."

2. Heard Sri ch.Narsi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and with &!* L '::-ai,il:-,L-- .-:. . i. d.:lllli:*.--i-*. 2 EVV, J Wp_35555_2025 their consent, this Writ Petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission staoe

3. Learned counsii [c;^ the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are the owners and possessors of the agricultural land admeasuring Acs-5.20 guntas i.e., Acs.2.2O guntas in Sy.No.460/UUll; Ac.Ol.OO guntas in Sy.No.46OlU; Ac.1.0O guntas in Sy.No.46O/U l2 and Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.46OlEE, situated at Nallavelly Revenue Village, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that, originally, petitioner No.1 had purchased the land admeasuring Acs.3.2O guntas in Sy.No.460 through unregistered sale deed and the said sadabainama was regularised uide File No.B/214511989 and the name of petitioner No.l was recorded as owner in the revenue records and he was also issued pattadar passbook and title deed. Learned counsel would further submit that, in the year 2OO7, petitioner Nos.2 and 3 have purchased the land admeasuring Ac.1.OO guntas each in Sy.No.46O through registered sale deed bearing document Nos.8595 of 2007 and 8594 of 2007, both dated 08.08.2007. In the year 2021, petitioner No.l had alienated the land admeasuring Ac.1.OO guntas out of Acs.3.2O 3 EW, J 35555 2025 Wp_ guntas in Sy.No.460 in flavour of petitioner No.2 through registered sale deed bearing document No. LZ32 of 2021, dated 24.o7.2o2L. The petitioners were issued e-pattadar passbooks. Learn"d counsel for the petitioners would submit that the unofhcial respondent is claiming that he is the owner of the subject propert5r by creating a sham registered sale deed bearing document No.4163 of 2006, dated rz.03.2006 in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.1.36 guntas in Sy.No.460 and filed a false suit uide o.S-No-g3 0f 2021, wherein status quo was granted and the said suit is pending on the file of the principal Junior civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioners also hled a suit for declaration of tifle against the unofficial respondent in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.2.oo guntas uide o.S.No.166 of 2024 and the same is pending before ttie principal Junior civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam. Subsequently, th:e unofficial respondent and others f,rled a suit for declaration in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.3.20 guntas uid.e o.s.No.Sg of 2025, wherein the learned Additional Junior civil Judge, Ibrahimpatnam, has granted status quo uid"e order, dated 2o.o2-2o25. Learned counser for the petitioners would further submit that, by suppressing the rear facts and without ::),.:.-,- i; -nl;BaffiiG.t8*.-- lFIr \ 4 EVV, J Wp_35555_202-< impleading the petitioners as party respondents, the unofficial respondenl has fited W.P.No.18689 of 2025 before this Court Seeking correcticn of the entries in the revenue records and for issuance of pattaciar passL'ook in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.1.31 guntas in Sy.No.460. This Court, by an order, dated O2.O7.2O25, disposed of the said writ petition permitting the petitioner therein (unofhcial respondent herein), to make appropriate online application in the prescribed format in Bhu Bharati Web Portal seeking correction of entries in the revenue records and for issuance of pattadar passbook in respect of the subject land. In the event of such application being made by the petitioner and if the same fulfills all the requirements under the provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 and the Rules made thereunder, the responcient authorities therein shall examine and consider the case of the unofficial respondent. Learned counsel would. further submit that, basing on the said order, the unofhcial respondent made a representation before respondent No.2 and hav'ing come to their knowled-ge about the said representation, the petitioners have submitted their objections. In the light oi the aforesaid circumstances, if anv action is taken by respondent No.2 on the application made by 5 EVV, J Wp_35555_2025 the unofficial respondent, the petitioners would suffer great loss and loose their rights guaranteed under Article 300-4 of the Constitution of India.

4. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue would submit that, admittedly, disputes are pending before the civil court and pending adjudication of the suits filed by both the parties, the unofficial respondent had obtained order from this court in w.P.No.18689 of 2o2s. He would further submit that without filing any online apprication by the unofficial respondents, Iiling of this writ petition by the petitioners is premature and misconceived and therefore, he prayed to dismiss the writ petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government pleader-for Revenue and upon perusal and examination of the material placed beio.. this court, it is revealed that the unofficial respondent had obtained the order in w.P.No.18689 of 2o2s by suppressing the facts. In the abserice of filing of online application, this court, without making any observations on the merits and demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing respondent No.2 to examine the case of the petitioners I I \ \ IE- 6 EW, J \Vp_35555 2025 6' duly taking into consideration their objections if any online application is filed by the unofficial respondent. After issuing notice to all the concerned and after granting sufficient opportunity of hearing to both rhe parties, respondent No'2 shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Since notice is stated to be ordered to respondent No.5, issuance of further notice to respondent No.5 in this writ petition shall stand dispensed with.

6. Accordingly, this lVrit Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// . PONNA KRISHNA REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER I To \ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 State of Telangana The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, S at Hyderabad-500022. The District Collector, Rangh Reddy District. At. Kongarakalan, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The Special Grade Deputy Collector cum, Revenue Divisional Officer, Ibrahimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy District. At. lbrahimpatnam Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The Tahasildar-cum-Joint Sub-Registra r, Yacharam Tahasil, Ranga Reddy District, At. Yacharam. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. IOUTI One CC to SRI CHILPIREDDY NARSIREDDY, Advscate [OPUC] Two CD Copies SA GJP HIGH COURT DATED:2411112025 ORDER WP.No.35555 of 2025 ,',* o (J -( t + Tl-r= s ,r{ r-. rl0 sEc M ,& D,4'y'6'r if :' a DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.