The High Court · 2025

Petition under Seclion 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash all further proceedings of petitioner/Accused No. 1 to 3 in CC No. 1082/2025 U/S.498-A, 406, RM.Sec.34 of tpC AND 4 of Dp Act. on the file of XV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Hyderabad, against the petition erlAccused No.1 to 3. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No. 1OB2|2O2S U/S.498-A, 406', RM.Sec.34 of IPC AND 4 of DP Act. on the fite of XV Additionat Chief Judictat Magistrate of First Class, Hyderabad as against the pet t oners herein in the interest of justice. l.A.NO;3&4OF2025 Between:

1. Smt.lr.4antravadi Anuradha Deepthi, D/o Mantravadi Kis r rre Kumar, aged 34 years, R/o.10-5-816, Nandanar Nagar, North Lalaguda. I ecunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana-50001 7. 2 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor Fi, h Court at Hyderabad. ...Respondents AND '1 . AvinashGarlapati, S/o Garlapati Narayan Rao, Aged r Private Employee, R/o Flat No.501, Sree Balaji Homr:r NRI Colony, Pragatinagar, Bachupally, Ivledchal lvlal[i 500090. bout 35 years, Occ. , Hanu Avaas Road, jgiri Dist Telangana,

2. Garlpati Venkata Rathnamala, W/o Garlapati Narayan a years,Occ. Housewife, Rio MlG.76, Door No.63r\ Vepagunta BRTS Road, Visakhaptnam AndhraPradesl^, 3. Garlapati Narayana Rao, S/o Late. Garlpati Thripur 65years, Occ.Retd.Employee(Navy), R/o Ir/1G.76, Do I Layout, Vepagunta BRTS Road,Visakhaptnam Andhra['r Rao, Aged about 58 Simhapuri Layout, t30047. nthaka Aged about No.63/4, Simhapuri rdesh,530047 ..Accusec 1 to 3/Respondents Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that I the circumstances stated in the affidavit along with permission, the High Cor r may be pleased to Permit the petitioner to compound the offences in C.C. 1 () 212025 UIS. 498-A, 406, RA/V. Sec. 34 of IPC AND 4 of DP Act On the file cf XV Additional Chief Judigial IVlagistrate of First Class, Hyderabad. I.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) R/W 528 of BNSS circumstances stated in the Affidavit, Joint memo and Cc Court may be pleased to record the compromise and ques compromise in C.C. No.108212025 Uls 498A, 406, R/W. Sec DP Act on the file of XV Addl. Chief Judicial lrlagislr Hyderabad. rraying that in the npromise, the High r the respondent to 34 of IPC and 4 of :te of First Class, This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing re lt/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argr I rents of I\,4r. Dileep Guntur, Advocate for the Petitioner and the lrilr. Jither-c lr Rao Veeramalla Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respcr jent No.1 and of Mr. D. Dinesh, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.1 5316 of 2O25 Date:24.12.2025 Between : Avinash Garlapali and tu'o others Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 1to 3 AND The State of Telangana, representcd by its Public Prosecutor, Hi,lh Court at I{yderabad, and anothcr RespondenLs COMMON ORDER: . This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioners/ accused Nos. 1 to 3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.1082 of 2025 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Judiciai Magistrate of First Class, Hyderabad.

2. Heard Mr.Dileep Guntur, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.D.Dinesh, Iearned counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during the pendcncy of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the weil i I I ) u'ishers, relativcs alrd elders, thc parties have r;r ttlccl the clisputes pencling betu,een them and entered into comprorc se itnd tilcd Joinr Memo. Accordingly, the parties have filecl LA.N,r .3 and 4 of 2025 sccking permissiorr to compound the offence a td to record the com prom ise respectivcly.

4. This Court uide order, datcd i9.12.2025, (l rected the parties i.e., the petitioners and respondent No.2, Lo aptr)iti r bcfore the High Court Legal Serviccs Commrrtee, HS,dcrabad, o I 20.12.20.25. In compliance of the said order, the Secretary, High C, urt l-egal Services Comrnittee, has submitted report, d,aLed 2O.12.20_Z;. stating that the petitioners and respondent No.2 were dulv ident I ed with copies of their Pan Card/Aadhar Cards. It is further stat: I that the parties have willfully and rvithout anv coercion entcrecl intc :ompromise,

5. In view of the said report and also in vieu. c I tite conrpromise entered between the petitioners and respondcnt |rr .2 as well as the submissions made by the respectivc parties, I.A.No .3 tLnd 4 of 2025 are allow-ed. Consequently, the proceeclings in C.() No.10g2 of 2025 on the lile of the XV Additional Chief Judicial Magis. ate of First class, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petition 3 .s.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is ailowed, s rbject to payment of costs of Rs.5,O0O/- (Rupees live thousand only) I thc High Court Legal Services Committee, Hvderabad, and Rs.S.(r( 0/ (Rupees five l thousand only) to the Tclangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by lhe petitioners, on or before 09.O1.2026. Miscellaneous applrcations, pending if any, 5[a11 stand closed sd/- A. REENIVASA REDDY STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER \ \ To, 1 The XV Additional Chief tt/letropolitan l\,4agistrate at Na The Station House Officer, WPS North Zone, Begumpet Police Station, Hyderabad. mpally, Hyderabad

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, State of Telangana, High Court Buildings, at Hyderabad (OUT)

4. One CC to [\4r. Dileep Guntur, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Mr. D. Dinesh, Advocate IOPUC] M, 6. Two CD Copies (Enclosed a copy of Joint Memo) Note: Total Amounl of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri .trrlr- Dileep Guntur, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 24.12-2025 as Rs.5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only )to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 2407 ot 2026 dated 07.01 .2026. HIGH COURT DATED:2411212025 COMMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 3 and 4 ol 2025 INiAND CRLP.No.15316 of 2025 rtr c' ( i\l- o c o CI i JA! 2|r7 tz * o F ALLOWING CRIMINAL PETITION AND l.A. NOS. 3 AND 4 0F 2025 q 1 q "Lb I i I i i j Memorandum of Criminal Petition (Under Section ariffi+.P,cl] i i1 (O) ai D Sz? B.ns-ss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: I{YDEI{ABAD: Crl.P.No. of 2025 AGAINST c. c. No. 1082 0F 2025 (ONTHE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CILASS, I]YDERABAD), AT:I]YDEI{ABAD Between:-

1. AvinashGarlapati, S/o ,Garlapati Narayan Rao, Aged about 35 years, Occ: .PrivaterErnployee, R/o Flat No:5O1, Sree Ba-laji Horrres, Hanr: Avaas Road, NRI Colony : Pragatinagar, Baihupally,'Medchal Malkajgiri Dist Telangana; 5OOO9O. 2 Garlpati Venkata Rathnamala.W/o c"4apali Naraydna Rao Agedabout58years, Occ: Flousewife, R/o MIG:16, Door No. 63 /A,Sirnhapuri Layout, Vepagurita BRTS Ro ad,ViSakhaptnarn AndhraPradesh, 53OO47.

3. GarlapatiNarayanaRao S/ ol-ate. G arlp atiThripuranthaka Agedabout6 Syears, Occ: Retd. Empi oyee(Nary), R/o MIG:76, Door t i I I I i i l l , I r I I I I I ! I I i I I I ; No. 63 /A,SirnLrapuri Layout, Vepagunta B RTS Road,Visakhaptn am AndLrraPradesh,53OO4T'

1. .The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public ProsecuLcrr High Court at llyderabad AND f x# I A(:( rl sed 1to 3

2. Sml. Mantravadi Anuradha Deepthi, D/o Mantrirr adi Kishc>re Kurnar, agcd 34 years Residing at 10-5 816, N:Ln lanar Nagar, North Lalaguda Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Tel rr gana'50')( ri7 .. Respondents/Defac -, Cornplainant JOINT MEMO FILED BY TI{E BOTI{ PAI{I lrS It is submitted that the Petitioners/A ccused 1 to 3 antL the l(espondcnt No.2/Detacto-Complainant was compromised before the eiders & rvell- rvishers, and /petitioner has no objections to quashing the prrr 'cedings in CC.C 1,08212025 U/S.498-4, 406, R/W.Sec.3't of IPC AND 4 of I) ' Act. on the file of XV Additional Chief Judieial Magistrate of First Class. lvderabad,in thc interest (lf iusticc Ll Counse I tbr tli Petitroners Iit P ( ir10 R NO-] TV. p r-- r rt'In\i R \ICT,2 .9 Pll l TTIONER- NO.3 iU; SIONDI]NT NO,2 { RE, ( o[rnsel lor lne I ^nd R spondent Place: Ilydelabad. Datedll .l\ .202s