The High Court · 2025

2. Ms. P. Apoorva, D/o. P.Krishnama Chary, Aged.3O years, Occ.Doctor, R/o. 3- 5-999/2,'Flat No.402, Sri Sai Ganesh Residency, Street No.5 Narayanaguda, Hyderabad ..RespondenuDefacto comprainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Cr:iminal Petition, the'High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings in Cr.No.439 of 2025 on the file P.S. Banjara Hills of Hyderabad District for the offences under Section 64 (1), 318(2), 318(4), of BNS Acl,2023 against the Petitioner/Accused No.1 in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Cr. No.439 of 2O2S on the file p.S Banjara Hills of Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above petition. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Yl".LrApoorva, D/o. P.Krishnama chary, Aged.30 years, occ.Doctor, R/o. 3- -5-999/2, Flat No.402, Sri Sai Ganesh Reiidency, Stieet No.5 NarayaniguOa, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner /Defacto complainanu Respondent No.2 in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2025 AND 1 lyrry..lqrupu.la,_S/o. Shankar Jerupula, Aged about 3g yea R/o. H.No.4-1-80/2, Reddy Bazdar, Airma Hospitai, Telangana. rs, Occ.Doctor, Mahabubabad, > ...RespondenUAccused No.1/ Petitioner in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2O2S

2. The state of relangana, Rep.by its public prosecutor, High court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad-. o ...RespondenU Respondent in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 Petition under section 3s9(6) R/w.528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/ Respondent No.2/De facto Complainant to compromise the matter with RespondenUAccused No.1 in Cr. No. 439 of 2025 on the file of P.S. Banjara Hills of Hyderabad District for the offences under Section 64(1),318(2);318(4) of BNS Act, 2023 against Accused No.1, and withdraw the same and'pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem first and proper in the circumstances of the present case. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) R/w.528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the ftfemorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to record our statement of compromise and thereby to Quash the proceedings in Cr. No. 439 of 2025 on the file of P.S. Banjara Hills of Hyderabad District for the offences under Section 64(1), 318(2); 318(a),of BNS Act,2023 against Accused No.1, in the interest of justice' This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MOHD BASEER RIYAZ, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and of Sri P.Sai Santosh, Advocate for the Respondent No,2l The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER ;:tl IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.3 a IN/AND 2o.25 AL .1s306 2o.25 Date:11.1 2.202s Between Swamy Jerupula ...Petitioner/Accused No. I AND The State of Telangana represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and another .Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused No.l seeking to quash the proceedings in crime No.439 of 2o2s of Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the oft'ences under Sections 64(l), 318(2) and 31s(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2029. 2 Heard Mr.Mohd.Baseer Riyaz, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.P.sai santosh, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr.v.Jithender Rao, learned Additional public prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No.l-State. 2 i1

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the well wishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the disputes pending between them and entered into compromise and filed Joint Memo. Accordingly, the parties have fiIed I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 seeking permission to compromise the matter and to record the compromise entered between them.

4. This Court uide order, dated O2.I2.2O25, directed the parties i.e., the petitioner and respondent No.2, to appear before the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, on or before 06.12.2025. In compliance of the said order, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report, dated 05.12.2025, stating that the petitioner, and respondent No.2 were duly identified with copies of their Aadhar Cards. It is further stated that the parties have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise.

5. In view of the said report and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioner and respondent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. .Consequently, the proceedings in Crime No.439 of 2025 of Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, 1e hereby quashed against the petitioner. : Lq_ -ttt' .i J

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.20,O00/- (Rupees twent5r thousand only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad and Rs.1O,O00/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioner, within one week from today. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER I To,

1. The lll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. The High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court fOr the State of Telangana, Hyderabad

3. The Station House Officer, Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad. 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad IOUTI

5. One CC to SRI MOHD BASEER RIYAZ, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRI P.SAI SANTOSH, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies along with copy of joint Memo is enclosed herewith Note: TotalAmount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Rachna Reddy & Associates, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 11.12.2025 as Rs.20,000/- ( Rupees twenty thousand only ) to the :'High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, and Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.147309 of 2025. ,NVB YY ,' :;,:. I HIGH COURT DATED i11l,1212025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.15306 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AND l.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2025 *fA ft,, i I I i MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL PETITION (UNDER SECTION 528 OF BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA) ,t- .,.. . j'i I '' : IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA 'l'.. .:, . I.A. No. IN -.. ':::' OF 2025 Crl.P. No. oF 2025 BETWEEN : Syamy"tlerupula S/o. Shankar Jerupula, Aged;, 38, Years, Occ.: Doctor, R/o.H,No,.4-l-8O I 2, Reddy Bazaar, Amma Hospital, M ahabub.abad,, Telangana. ...Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND I .: The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Coqrt for the state of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. M/s; P. ApoorvaD-lo. P. Krishnama Char5r, Respdndent Age : 3O years, Occ. : Doctor, R/,9,3-5-9ggl2,FlatNo.4o2,SriSaiGaneshResidency, Street No,5, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad. : ' ...DeFacto Complainant / Respondent No.2 ,, . JOINT MEMO FILED BY BOTH THE PARTIES :, ''It is submitted that the Petitioner/Accused No.l and the 21d I . ,..'' ,r.,,,,' Respondgnt/De factg .Qomplainc.nt w€re compromised in te-rms of t}i compromise deed and the Respondent No.2 has no objection to Quash : j... . .-'. : . tlre proccedings in Cr. No. 439 of 2025 on the file of P.S. Banjara Hills of Hyd.er.abad District for the offences under Section 64(tl, Sfb121,318(4) of BNS Act, 2023 against Accused No.l, in the interest of justice and to q pass such other order or orders as this Hon,bre court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the above case. Respondent No.2/ Complainant -J (wqryi ,. Petitioner/Accused No. I Counsel for De f:rr:to Complainant t No.2 / Cou Accused'No.l