The High Court · 2025

statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmay bepleasedtoquashtheCCNo.54glof2O2lonthefileofXlVAddlJudicial Magistrate of First Class at Kukatpally Medchal - Malkajgiri District t.A. NO :1OF 2O24 PetitionunderSection528ofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmay be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners/ accused no.1 to 3 in CC No 549'1 of 2O21 on the file of XIV Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Kukatpally Medchal pending disposal of the above criminal petition. Malkajgiri District, t.A. NO: oF 2024 2 Between: ft"^,1f S:iilil;,H!";,3J9'v Kiran, Ased 35 years, J a s a d s i ris u tta n r o. r, ir+i;li#ilil fJfi : U'1l Jf; 3:'d fl '3, jtJ :?:flt Tj], " t''' ...Petitioners / Defacto Complainant AND ,:?:fJgg,"JJiffSii3;I"nn Pubric Prosecutor, High .ourt at Hyderabad Gundigaram Udaya Kiran. S/o yc,c. pvt. Employee R/o. H No r etangana - 3. Gundagaram Udava Ranian s/^ /: \/ o^_ r. r,I -s i,3:. 3i & J r.fu"rr#,' #,:: -s:Jffi 4. Gudagaram Seetha ...Respondent / Respondent 3Y ?i X%:',U"y,XxY,i,*11 l3 i S?i,i.l [?Ti 5,"1fl ! fiil i #f,", ]. r3 3ii;,? 3i; #5 ; :*9'.";:x,",'#'h?[]nt[*'fi n8:'iil?i:s't?&ff l5liigi 1 2 ...Respondent / Accused 1 to 3 Petition under Sect stated n the Memora nd#:::'-:?.I ;H:j:ll:;T l,J,il:ff :;:; be preased to permit me to compound offences u/s 4gg-A of rF,c and section 3 and 4 0f Dp Act and quash the proceedings in cc No. 5491 0f 2021 .nthe fire of judiciat rV,tasistrate of First ctass at Kukatpa,y Medchirt_Matkajgiri Xll,:ra, l.A. NO:3OF 2024 Petition under section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in th: circumstances stated in the [Vtemorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromise as per Mou, dt. 23t[gl2[2ttand quash the proceedings in cc No' 5491 0f 2021 0n the fire of xrv Addr Judiciar Magistrate of First Ctass at Kukatpally lvledchal_Matkajgiri District. i I i I I I i I This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri T S Murthy, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri K Brahmaiah' Advocate for Respondent No.2. N The Court made the following Commqn Order : ., .'1,'. . . HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JU\ryADI SIUDEVI I.A.Nos.2 and3 of 2024 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.l6l5 0 of 1t024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Seotion 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 3 :o quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.5491 of 20i,.1 on the file of XIV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Kukatpally" Medchal-Malkajgiri District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498.4 of IpC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise b:twer:n them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 07.01.2025, this Courr directed the parties along with their respective counsel to apperrr before the Secretary,, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court I t 1 2 for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad' for identification and to submit a rePort.

4.PursuanttotheabovesaiddirectionissuedbythisCourt, the parties have appeared and the Secretary' High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 10.01.2025 and the same is placed on record'

5. In view of the above, I'A'Nos'2 and 3 of 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos'l to 3 in C.C.No.549l of 2O2l on the file of XIV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Kukatpally' Medchal-Malkalgiri District, are herebY quashed' Miscellaneous applications, if any pending' shall stand closed. a Sd,- T. JAYASREE ASSIST NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY" CTION OFFICER To, Magistrate at Kukatpally Cyberabad

1. The Xl Additional Metropolitan o The XIV Additional L'ai"tf fvf'gitt'ate of First Class at Kukatpally' Medchal- ; Hl',t#'il"" on'""' Jasadgirigutta PS' MedcharDistrict i' Hish courtrorthe state orrelansana' iffi"C,}jtd*" "o"" "*""""

5. One CC to Sri T S N Murthy, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri K Brahmaiah, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies IAlong with the Copy of the Joint ltilemo of Compromise I I Vtugh g HIGH COURT I \ DATED:23 t011202s COMMON ORDER l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2024 in / and CRLP.No.161S0 of 2024 /t/i5' .i a; ..:', 14sEH1 0 t rrr' zris \,. .\ , 51rC *F-o )( r ). J I I i t I i ALLOWING THE CRLP AND l.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 2024 @bri8W I MEMORANDUM OF C.RL.p.M.p. FILED U/S 3se OF BNSS) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT :: HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA Crl.P.M:P. No. In Criminal Petition No. of 2024 of 2024 Between:- 1) Cundagaram Udaya Kiran, 5/o. 6undagaram Udaya Ranjan, Age 35 years, Occ : Pvt., Employee R/o. H. No. 12-12-53, Seethaphalmandi, Secunderabad, Telangana 2) 6undagaram Udaya Ranjan, S/o. C.Y. Ram Murthy, Age 66 years. Occ: Rtd., Employee R/o. H. No. 12-12-53, Seethaphalmandi, Secunderabad, Telangana 3) Cudagaram Seetha Rama Lakshmi, W/o. C'undagaram Udaya Ranjan, Age 58 years, Occ : House Wife, R/o. H. No. 12-12-53, Seethaphalmandi, Secunderabad, Telangana AND The State of Telangana l) Through Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hy.derabad for the State of Teiangana .. Petitioners/ accused 1 to 3 .. Respondent/ Respondent 2) C. Rajya Lakshmi, Wo.6. Uday Kiran, Aged 35 years, Occ. Student R/o. Flat No. 1Ol, Sai Tulasi Residency, Dwaraka Nagar, Phase-ll, Cajularamaram, Jagadgirigutta, Medchal-Malkajgiri District .. ResPon d n Defact plainant /'- -C-,+Dl Ea'v\'l Y f IOINT MEMO 1) It is submitted that the Petitioners herein filed the al:,ove euash Petition seeking tc, quash the proceedings in CC No. 5491 of 2O2l on the file of XIV Addl Judiciar Magistrate of First class at Kuk,tpail'7 Medchal- Malkajgiri District, for the offence under sections 498-A,f rpC and Section 3 & 4 of DP Act. The Responclent No. 2 has lodgt:d the, above case against the Petitioners under sections 49g-A of rpc and Sectio.r 3 & 4 of DP Act, wherein the Pctitioner were figured as Accusecl No. 1 to 3 and the matter is pencling before this Hon,ble court. 2) We submit that at the instance of elders and *,ell-n,ishers, all the parties including all of us have come to a concrusi.n to settre the disputes pending before this Hon,ble Cour by enterinr3 ink.r an MOU dated 23.09.2024. As such we have fired a petition seekng trre Hon'bre Court to record the Compromise. The content mentionecl in the said Compromise Petition is true and coffect to the best of our k.nowledge and belief. The said compromise is entered with free ra.in arr,d consent and without an1. undue influence from any one. F{ence, we, are filing the present joint affidavit. Hence this joint memo Hyderabad, Date:- .12.2024 (6undag rzrm UcJaya Kiran Counsel fo tioners (Gund agaram Udaya Ranjal Counsel for ent Nc.2 :larrRen-El) h+" P-rr,+G@f^^ (G.Rh{1y a L;rkshnii)