✦ High Court of India · 18 Nov 2025

Ponampelli Ravi v. violation of principles of natural justice under articles 14

Case Details High Court of India · 18 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
18 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
2,173 words

Petition under Section j51 CpC praying that in the cir,:urns1"n"., stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court rnay be preased to grant stay of all further proceedings incrudes TG PGLCET:202s spot admission process for LL.tr,4 2 Years course for academic year 2025- 26 in the pursuance of notification issued by Respondent No.3 till submit the status,report of joining of candidates in LL.M for 1st phase and 2nd phase counsefling with aI the detairs of the seats filled up in Govt.iUniversity/Aided colege seats and private seats for the academic yeat 2025- 26 by Respondent No.3, pending main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI CHIKKUDU PRABHAKAR, REP. FOR SRI. CH. CHAITANYA MITHRA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: AGP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A.P. SURESH RAM, SC FOR TGCHE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 6: SRI MALIPEDDI SRINIVAS REDDY, SC FOR O.U. Counsel for the Respondent No.7: -- The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT P ETITION No.35 183 0F zfJ25 ORDER Heard Sri Chikkudu Prabhakar, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.Chaitanya Mithra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner on record, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Highei Education the respondent No.1, appearing on behalf of Sri A.P.Suresh Ram, learned standing counsel for TGCHE appearing on behalf of the respondent No'2 and Sri Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy, learned standing counsel for Osmania University appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 to 6.

2. The petitioner aoproac ed the Courto seekinq amended pra ver as under: "...to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 in non allotting the seat in Post Graduate Degree in Law-Education r(Master of Laws/ Legum Magister) for 2 years course for academic year 2025-26 in spite of having merit and qualification and secured the rank 403 with in zone of consideration in pursuance with detailed notification released by Respondent No.3 is an ex facie illegal, ,arbitrary, discrimination, unfair, u n reaso na ble, unconstitutional and violatlon of principles of natural justice under articles 14, 21, 21A of Constitution of India and in 2 SN. J violation of rules in notification and in violation against catena of Judgments of Honble Courts and set aside the same of Spot Admission Guidelines and pass....., 3 The case f the oetitioner in brief as oer the verm n etition r the affi filed b the Detitioner in suooort of the Dresent Writ Petition is as under: - It is the specific case of the petitioner that the petitioner had applied for entrance exam in the stream of LLM through TG PG LAWCET-2025 and had attended the entrance exam with Hall Ticket bearing No.32532110393 and had secured a Rank of 403 in the stream of LLM in TG PG LAWCET-2025. It is further the case of the petitioner that as per the information available on the website, the LLM, certificate verification was scheduled to commence from 25.08.2025 for the academic year 2025-26, but however, the same had been postponed by the respondent University due to certain internal reasons and the petitioner had checked the university website regularly till Diwali and thereafter, the petitioner fell sick and was unable to check the website for a few days and when the petitioner had checked website again the registrations were closed for online certiFicate verification, but the petitioner did not .) SN. J receive any SMS alerts or any prior intimation contrary to the notification which indicated certain specific dates in the admission process, and the petitioner thereafter opted For second phase counseling, choosing only respondent Nos.5 & 6 colleges, but the petitioner however could not secure a seat the LLM admission for the academic year 2025-26 and therefore, the petitioner requested respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein to verify the LLM seats by duly examining the admission status of the students who reported after completing the joining formalities in accordance to ther rules after the 1tt and 2nd phase counseling and to consider the request of the petitioner for adrnission in the stream of LLM through TS PG LAWCET-2025 in the vacant LLM seats under the spot admission category as per the spot admission guidelines uploaded on the websiter However, though the representation of the petitioner, datecl 73.11.2025 had been acknowledged by the respondent Nos.l tc 3 herein, no action had been initiated on the said request of the petitioner, dated 13.11.2025 till as on date. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner approached the Court by filing the present writ petition. 4

4. PE USED THE RECORD SN. J \ The reDresentation of A 13.LL.2025 addressed to the re Dondent Nos.1 to 3 the Detitioner herein is extra ed hereu der: - I submit that I had applied for entrance exam in the stream of L.LM into TS PGLAWCET -2025 and I had attended entrance exam with hall ticket bearing no: 32532110393 and I have secured a rank of 403 in the stream of LLM into TS PGLAWCET -2025. I respectfully further submit that I had seen in the news paper advertisement given by Convenor, Tclawcet/ TG PGLCET -2025 Admn. Dated 26-07-2025 and the same was uploaded in the website and the information mentioned like for LL.M certification verification will be commence from 25-OB-2O25 for the academic year 2025-2026. However, it was postponed due to internal reasons of TS PGLCET-2025, Osmania U niversity. I respectfully further submit that I have been checked website till before Diwali and after that I was sick unable to check website for some days. In mean [ime first web counselling registrations completed that the information not informed by SMS Alerts for resuming LL'M admission process as it was advertised dates earliest and halted hopefully with internal reasons' I had registered for 2nd phase counselling and I opted only for O.U. Campus & P.G. College of Law due to less seats availability, I did not secured seat what I had chosen stream selection seat in the LL.M Admission for 2025-26' I have much enthusiastic admit into LL.M about University/Campus/Govt. Institutions for higher education in law, Self Fina nce( Evening ). However, I request your esteemed authority to verify the LL.M Seats V/s Admission status of students who reported through joining formalities 1& 2nd phase counselling and I ) SN. J leftover vacant LL. M seats For spot admission category and praying for to take wise decision with utmost priority on urgency of spot admission guidelines uploaded in the webs ite. DISCUSSION AN D CONLCUS ION:- 5, Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the limited relief sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is a direction to the 3.d respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner as put-forth by the petitioner vide petitioner,s representation, dated 13.11.2025 addressed to the 1st respondent herein and also to the 2nd & 3rd respondent herein.

6. Learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 to 6 fairly submits that the writ petition could be disposed of directing the 3.d respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner as put-forth by the petitioner vide petitioner,s representation, dated 13.11.2025 addressed to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein, in accordance to law, within a reasonabte period, 6 SN. J

7. Learned counsel aooearinq on behalf of the oetitioner does not disoute the said submission made bv the learned standinq counse! aooearinq on behalf of the resoondent Nos.3 to 6.

8. Takinq into consideration: - a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case. b) The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 c) The contents of the representation of the petitioner, dated 13.11.2O25 addressed to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 having been acknowledged by the said respopdents. d) The fact that no orders had been passed on the said representation of the petitioner, dated 13.11.2025 addressed to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein till as on date. e) The discussion and conclusion as arrived at para Nos.s to 7 ol the present order. -7 7 SN- J Thewrit Petitionisdi soosed of, irect inq the 3 rt' s c e r n f h e Dut-forth Detitione r's reDrese ntation, dated I 2 n .11 tmentofs eat under Dot a d mission cateo orv as per the sDot admi sr on quide lines u nder TSP LAW ET-2 25 of h u n e I a e o2 -2 con der n em rit r efl eLL c a c n LL s 202s-26. after due ver fication of con der h ion to thEDetiti oner into DEtitioner for DTovr nqadmi the LLM cou rse und er the soota mts ron cate orv, a ord c a n e ek ro e a of re m tc o of th o r d th sar s e e e r r all en o rs st co Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. P.PONNA KRISHNA STANT REGISTRAR / sd/. lTt SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 2 3 Ihe_ 9tqte.of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary for Higher Education, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Telangana. Stale Secrdtariat, Hydeiabad The Telangana Council for Higher Education (TGCH=), Rep. by Hon'bte Chairman, Hyderabad. The Convener, TS PG LCET - 2025, Osmania University, Hyderabad. I _P

4. The Vice - Chancellor, Osmania University, Hyderabad_ 5. The Registrar, Osmania University, Hyderabad. 6. The Principal, O.U. College of Law, O.U.Campus, Hyderabad. 7. The Principal, P.G. Cotlege of Law, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 8. One CC to SRl. CH CHA|TANYA MTTHRA Advocate'[OPUC] 9. One CC to SRI A.P SURESH RAM, SC FOR TGCHE 10 One CC to SRI MALIPEDDI SR|N|VAS REDDY, SC FOR O.U. 1l.Two CCs to GP FOR HtcHER EDUCATTON ,High Courr for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

12. Two CD Copies \ PVL u- PMK I a i ::.". " .Lu': - .ffi;.:a I HIGH COURT CC.TODAY DATED:1811112025 \ ORDER WP.No.35183 of 2025 : i L-l 1i' () .'(l t,,,,. .,\ ^1.r. i:r :_) i ..4. * .r.. iii/2125 {" t: I I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS a\t'/

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments