Syed Pasha Miya v. 'l . The State of Telangana

6. Sri Jangili Nagesh, S/o. J. Pentaiah Age. Major, occ. Not Known, R/o. H.No. 2-23, lvladdikunta Villa.. Sadhasivapet Mandal, Medak District.

7. Kasamsetty Narasimha, S/o. K. Krishnaiah, Age. Major, Occ. Not known Fl/o. H.No. '10-1-92l3/34A, AMPRO Colony, Janaki Enclave, Lingojiguda, Ragareddy District ...RES'.NDENTS Petitron under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [\rlandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 2 and 3 in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the respondent No. 4 to 7 and his associates as illegal, arbitrary and u nconstitutional, consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondent not to pressurize the petitioners to compromise the civil disputes with the unofficial respondents and his associates. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the (:i cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court n: y be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 and 3 not to interfere with the civil dis r rtes pending between the petitioners and the respondent No 4 to 7 and his r;sociates and not to pressurize the petitioners to compromise the civil dispul s with the unofficial respondent and his associates pending disposal of writ petit r n. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SOMA RAVI KIRAN REDD./ Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 3: AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 TO 7: - The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR UIRTT PETITIONNo.35206of 2o25 ORDER: Heard Sri Soma Ravi Kiran Reddy, learned counsel for the Government pleader for Home 3. With their consent, this writ petitioner and learncd Assistalt appearing for respondcnt Nos. I to petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. This writ petition is hled a-lleging that the respondent Nos.2 and 3 are interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner artd respondent Nos.4 to 7 and his associates. 3' Facts of the case as stzrted in brief are that the grandfather of the petitioner namely Syed Babu Miya was a protected tenant of the land admeasuring Ac.g.34 guntas in Survey No.22l (OId Survey No.21 1) of patloor Village, Marpally Village, Vikarabad District (hereinafter referred as "subject land,). It is submitted that petitioner and his family members are in peaceful possession of the subject land from l9SO,s without any interference from any corner and that the father of the petitioner was also granted protected tenancy rights by way of proceedings uid.e Flle No.D/29a9/ dJ92 dated 03. 12.1992 issued by the M.R.O., Marpally Ma;rdat. +. The main grievance of the petitioner and his family members is that respondent Nos.4 to 7 along with their henchmen started interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner,s schedure property by creating fabricated and false sale deeds and tried to i ! I 2 dispossess the petitioner lrom the schedule propert, and thus the petitioner and his family members filed a civil suit uic e O.S.No.205 of 2025 beforc thc Junior Civil Judge at Vikarabad nd the suit is pending adjudication. It is further submitted that u I ile things stood thus, respondent No.3 u,ith the aid of responder t No.2 sta,rted interfering with the petitioner's schedule propert). (,r i3.11.2025 &

15.11.2025 whilc thc civil dispute still pcnding adjud:< rtion before the triai Court and it is further submitted that respondt rt No.2 started interfering into the civil dispute and pressurizing t-t ( petitioner and his family members [o settle the civil dispute p:rrding against respondent Nos.4 to 7. Aggricvcd by the action of rc;pondent Nos.2 and 3 this writ petition is filed.

6. On thr: written instructions issued by respondr r t No.3, learned Government Plea.der for Home subm;.tted that, respo: dent No.3 and his staff are discharging legitirnate duties and did I rt call, harass, threaten or interfere rvith the petitioner's personal lire liberty or civil disputes and herve not taken any coercivc stcps agait:t the petitioner in any manner and also stated that as per the stati()r recorCs, as of now, the petitioner herein is not involved in any crirr i ral case on the hle of respondent No.3.

5. Having considered the abo're facts and circum.,r tnces and also in view of the closing of the case by the respondents as civil in nature, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of tlr . case, this wril petition is disposr:d of directing thc respondent Nos.2 ,I 3 to follow due /./ / 3 procedure as contemplated under law both on the petitioner and on the subject property. Needless to state that petitioner may seek appropriate remedy as available under law. 1 With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs SD/.P.PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. The Superintendent of police, Vrkarabad, Vikarabad District. The Station House Officer, ltrlarpalle, Vikarabad District. One CC to SRI SOIVA RAVI KIRAN REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOIVE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies To 1 2 J 4( 6 PSK. TKS AY 4 L HIGH COURT DATED:1911112025 ORDER WP.No.35206 of 2025 L:.i ltt'J .,]. ').. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS { tl 1,). i I i I i I I I I i I