SRt G v. S. GANESH counser for the

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affadavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or a Writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in releasing the admitted and acknowledged payments due to the Petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1Xg) of the Constitution of lndia and consequently, directing the Respondents herein to jointly and severally release the payments of Rs. 51,42,0g3/- being the aggregate of the amounts admitted / acknowledged to be due to the Petitioner along with interest alias 12o/o per annum. i 7 IA NO: 10F 202s Petition under Section .l5l CpC the affidavit filed in support of the petiti the Respondents to forthwith release acknowledged and admitted payments pending disposal of the Writ petition. praying that in the r ircumstances stated in on, the High Court rr ly be pleased to direct the amount of R,; 5.1 ,42,093/_ being the due to the petition: by the Respondents. Counsel for the petitioner: SRt G. V. S. GANESH counser for the Respondents No.1 to 4: AGp FoR INDUSI R,ES & coMMERCE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: AGp FOR FINANCE & r _ANNING The Court made the following: ORDER t HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.3516O of 2O25 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Commerce and Industries appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning appearing for respondent No.5 2 This writ petition is filed seeking following prayer:- "...declaing the inaction of the respondents in releasing the admitted and acknouledged pagments due to the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and uiolattue of Articles 14 and 19(1)(9) of the Constitution of India and consequentlg directing the respondents herein to jointlg and seuerallg release the pagments of Rs.51,42,O93/- being tLe aggregate of the amounts admitted/ acknouledged to be due to the Petitioner along with interest 12 percent per arLnum...'

3. The brief facts of the case as stated are that petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturing plastic products. The Government of Telangana introduced T-IDEA (Telangana State Industrial Development and Entrepreneur Advancement) ./ ) Incentive Scheme, 2014 extending incenLives :r rd benehts to new Industrial Enterprises set up in the stat : It is further submitted that the operational guidelines unct r the T-IDEA Incentive Scheme, 2Ol4 ale notified. The said Q t). provides for reimbursement of tax, power subsidy and reirr bursement of infrastructure expenditure in addition to reirt tursement of power cost/ subsidy and interest subsidy. t is further submitted that respondent No.3 issued sancti rn letters for various incentives such as Investmer t Subsidy, reimbursement of Sales tax, reimbursemer 1 of Interest Subsidy under Pavala Vaddi Scheme and reirr rursement of Power Cost with total amounting to Rs.51,42,0!) i/-. However, the above sanctioned amount has not been reieri ed and thus, the petitioner had taken up the matter with tlrr Dcpartment concerned for pa5rment of the incentive amoutr-_ payable to it and submitted representation, requesting for t re release of sanctioned amounts, as the petitioner is in dire r eed of funds, I which was threatening its very existence. l is further submitted that consolidated proceedings were ir;. ued wherein amounts were released to several units whose se -ial numbers are behind the petitioner's serial number. l is further submitted that petitioner has set up the projer: considering 3 that the State Government should provide incentives as per the policy and that the petitioner would be able to have competitiveness in the market place. By delaying the release of such incentives, the petitioner has been put to a serious disadvantage. Questioning the same present writ petition is filed.

4. karned counsel for the petitioner submits that on a similar set of facts and circumstances, this Court passed orders in W.P. No.9153 of 2023 by directing the respondents to release the amounts due and payable to petitioners within a period of eight (O8) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order ald prays to pass appropriate order in the present writ petition.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Commerce and Industries did not dispute the same and on instructions of The General Manager, District Industries Centre submits that sanction letters were issued for release of the various incentives granted to the petitioner's company. It is further submitted that the amount would be released as and when unit terms comes as per seriatim for disbursement of funds. It 4 is further submitted that respondent No.2 will tat e action for release of funds as per the budget availability.

6. In view of the same, recording the above sui missions of either side and without expressing any opinion or the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of rt recting the respondent authorities to pay the various incent ves as per their entitlement, as expeditiously as possibl,: preferably within a period of three (O3) months from the date rf receipt of copy of this order.

7. Accordingly, with the above directions this wri petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if aly pending, r hall stand closed. No order as to costs. -/ //TRUE COPY// sD/-P. I ASSIS'T ONNA KRISHNA .I \NT REGISTBAR--- // St CTION OFFICER a To M MP BS 'l . The Principal Secretary lndustries and Comme De: rrtment, State of Telangana, Dr. B R Ambedkar Telangana Secretari yder rbad - 5O0 O22 2. The Commissioner of lndustries, Government of Telangarr Chirag-Ali Lane, e a Abids Hyderabad - 500 001 Telangana Chirag-Ali Lane, Abids Hyderabad - 500 001 Ambedkar Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad - 5O0 022.

3. The Additional Director, O/o. the Commissioner of lndustri rs Government of 4. The General Manager, District lndustries Centre Ranga ReJ Jy District 5. The Principal Secretary Finance Department, State of T: angana, Dr. B R 6. One CC to SRI G. V. S. GANESH, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for lndustries & Commerce, High Cour for the State of 8. Two CCs to GP for Finance & Planning, High Court for the i ate of Telangana 9. Two CD Copies Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] at Hyderabad. [OUT] HIGH COURT DAT'I:D:2611112025 { HE I', 07 Jr: a(J / ORDER WP.No.35160 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE U/RIT PETITION . WIT {OUT COSTS (. \ \