[tlr. Akula Sqlish v. q|D.D

B. The Tahsildar, Bachupally Village and fi/andat, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, 9. Hyderabad Disaster Response and Assets Protection Agency (HYDRA), Rep . ^ by its_Metropolitan Commissioner, MA and UD, Secretaribt, Hyderabad. 10 The Chief Engineer, lrrigation, Hyderabad, Errumanzil. 11.The Superintending Engineer, lriigation Circle, Red Hills, Hyderabad. '12.Vasa-vi l1[rq ]-LP, Rep. by its Designated Partner Sri. Vijaya Kumar Yerram, 010. 2-120186191N1, 12and2113, 1st Floor, North End, Aniiath Maja Housing Society, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034. - Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of ...RESPONDENTS t t I I writ of Mandamus to the Respondent '1 to 'r 1 drrecting, A,.To set aside the survey dated 02-1 1-2023 and subsequent letter vide Lr.N6.Lpi1}23t2o23 dated 21-12- 2023 as illegal, marafide, arbitrary and unconstitution a r. B.To set aside the revised FTL Map dated 06-08-2024 as illegal, malafide, arbitrary and uncon stitutiona l. c.To declare action of official responcents in accepting patta land of unofficial respondenl against the FTl/buffer are:r of Komati kunta under the guise of revised FTL map as illegal, malafide, arbitrary and u nconstitutiona I under Art 14,21 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia anrl against the natural law of justice and completely in violation of principles of natural justice lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 15 1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the offrcial respondent g to conduct the resurvey of Komati kunta Lake by due notice to petrtioner and respondents under suoervision of advocate commission and pendrng disposal of the above writ petition lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to maintain status quo in respect of brock no B and g and pending disposar of the above writ petition counsel for the Petitioner: sRr. KAMBALAPALLT SRAVAN KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,4&B: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR RE:VENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SC FOR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.S:Ms. D. MADHAVI, SC FOR HMDA counsel for the Respondent No.6: sc FoR MUNlcrpAL coRpoRATtoN counsel for the Respondent No.9: sRr K. RAVTNDER REDDY, sc FoR HYDRA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3,7,i0&11: SRI LAXMALLA SANDEEp , AGP FOR IRRIGATION Counsel for the Respondent No. 12:SRl ROHIT pOGULA The Court made the following: ORDER I I I I q HON'BLE SRI JdSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.35954 of 2024 ORDER This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of tlire Constitution of India, is hlcd seeking the following relief: "....1o rssue a wiL crder or direchon more particulo.rlg one il the nature of Wit of Mdnd.qmus to the. respondent ,lr'os. i to 7 l directtng A) To set o.side the sw-ueA dated 02.11.2023 and Subseqtent letter uide Lr.No.N6 LP/1823/2023 dated 21.12.2023 us ill.egal, maLa,1de, qrbttrary end unconstitutional B) To set aside the reuised FTL Map dated 06.08.2024 as illegal, malalide, ar b itrary aad unq)nstttutio nal C) To declare action of offi.cial respondents in accepting patta land of unoffi.cial respondetTt against the FTL/ buJfer erea of Komatt kunta vnder th.e gutse of reutsed F-TL map as illegat, mqbrtde, arbitrcrA and unconstitutional Undcr Art 14, 21 and ja1A of the constitution of India and against the natural lc,u of justice and compLetelA in uiolation of pinciples of natural jttstice. . . . . "

2. Considcred the submissions of learned counsel for ttre peLitioner; Sri L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation appearing for respondent Nos.1, 4 and 8; Sri Laxmalla Sandeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation appearing for respondent Nos.3, 7, 1O and 11 and peruscd tle record.

3. It is stated that the petitioner is the local resident of Bachupally Village and Maldal, under Nizarnpet Municipal 2 Corporation, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, and there exists Komafi Kunta (Lake) forming part of Sy.Nos.126, 722 and 137. It is further stated that unofhcial respondent h.as purchased sorue extent of lands in the said survey numb:rs, and starteci constructions in the FTL (Full Tanl< Level) liriits of the Komati Kunta, thercfore, the petiticner has submitte,l number of r-epresentations before the respondent axthorities, but no action has be:n taten, therefore, he was consLained to file Wp (plr ) I'1c.74 of 2C23, and the ur.;ofEcial iespondent has also hlecl \Y.P.1Jc.29271 ot 2023, and this Court viclc comrncn crder datecl

01.07 .2024. disposcd of the said writ petitions observrng as "I'lre issue Lullcther or /.ot Block Nos S c,ncl g are being cottstructecl uithitt tle FTL linLits B required. to be dec jetl bU the con-pete authoritlt of the HL,IDA on t!,r ba-sis of subseqtent jont insPectiotl rcpotl d.eted ) l _ 12.2O2J coricC o t bll tllc Reuenue and ttle Inigetion Depurl:r.cnt-s tn tl e prese.\.e oJ thc fnrt Luetl othenuise, the oforesall issue. uhbh is (1it issue of fact catt:to! be tuljudicate.cl in a sununary proce(:ding1 umler Anicle 226 of thc Consituttion cJ India ThercJore, thp orCers dated 15.C9_2023 c:nct 19.09.2023 passed bg the HMDA tnd the Muticipal (ht)or.,tion rcspecliucly arc quoshed. The competent autlbritA of the HLIDA sltdl ttke a decbiott ajresh oi tle bc..sis oJ ttv joitt surueg report dated i,1 j 2.2023 qurieC out bll th.e Reuenue (tnd the lrrigat@n DepartmetTts in the preserlce oJ tle linn, uithn a period oJ four ueeks from th"e date of receip. of a copA oJ lhe order passed tod..!!- Mecdless to state lhat lhe .rl t.ltorizetd rcpresentatiu. .f tlle fimt shall be giuen an opporhlnitg of heaitgr be.f67s nn w 3 order is po-ssed b! the competent autl&.ilg oI the IIMDA Tlrc frm i^s also g.anted th.e libertV to mo.ke a praacr thal pendiag deciston of lhe HI DA, on /he bdsis oI Joitt Swue| uh?ther t stauld be pen iued lo toisc cotLstruction in respecl of Block Nos-8 and 9 of tlLe subject propedA. In case such a prager is made, tle IIMDA sl:,,ll toke a suilable decision.'

4. It is further stated that respondent Nos.3 to 8 have conducted several joint surveys stating that there is FTL land in Sy.Nos.126/p and 137 /p, whereas rcspondent No.2 has issued a letter vide No.N6.LP/182312023, dated 21.12.2023 stating that as per the sethwar and Pahanies, Sy.No. 127 is classified as poramboke sarkari to an extent of l.c.2.37 guntas which is falling in the Shikam of Komati Kunta Cheruvu. The grievance of the petrtioner is that in terms of the directions of this Court, he suhmitted number of representations to stop the illegal constructions in the FTL (Full Tank Level) .limits of the Komati Kunta, to protect the said take, but in order to facilitate the adjacent cncroachers/ land grabtiers, the respondent authoriLics are not taking action to identify.and hx the boundaries of the said lake. :

5. Learned counsel for respondent No. 12 submitted that in terms of the orders of this Couft, respondent authorities have ;' conducted survey and refixed :the FTL of the said lake in I Sy.Nos.126/p and. 137/p to an extentof Ac.21.11guntas. \ 4 - i:;r-. l t

6. In vicrv of thc abovr:, this Court without 1ir>ing into thc disputed facts regarding the FTL, as the State Gor eri-rment rvith a laudablc object constituted spccial autholities lbr- rcvocation of the tanks/ponds within the State in terrns of th: rlirccrions of the Hon'blc Apcx Court in various ;udgrncnts, c.rd:; of justicc vrould be rnet, if responCent No.9 is clirected tc rc-exarainc rlre documents relatiIlg tc th,i i(orr:atr liuttta Lakc for fi:<ing thc boundarics and lor re-corlducting srrn cy aticr issuing notices to the in terested / affe ctcd oers.-.rr:r, rvitlt the assistance ol FIMDA, Rcvcnu.: Deprrr:mr:nt :r trl lrrigaiic:. Diipartment lor protecting the saiC lalces from e l croaclrmel'-s. The entire exercise shall be corrpleted lr,ithin : l) rn,)d of threc (O3) mcr,tirs iiom the date of receipr- of a copy of th s c,rder.

7. l\Iith the above ob:.- , t:ions, this Writ Petitir,rr rs rlisposcd of. Therc shall be no ordcr as to costs. As a sequel, the nriscellar.reous petigiffrftqriing, if anv. shall stand :loscd //TRUE COPY// SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL \,o{eurv REGTsTRAR rl,l' ' I \=..r." or.,"i* \\' . I To, 1 2 l) Ih_e Special Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, T.S.,Hyderabad. The Secretary to Government, Union of lndia, Ministry of Environment, Forest and C]rmate Change, lndira Paryavaran Bhawan, Jtbagh Road New Delhi- 1 10 003 The_ lrrigation and CAD Department, Assistant Executive Engineer J and QADP, Bachupally Mandal, lrrigation Sub Division \o 3, I\itedclal-lMalkajgiri District @*5@z : ti_ta '''- ' /,, 4 o 7 B The District Collector, Medchal lrilalkalgiri District, At Keesara Rd, near ORR Keesara, Godumakunta, Secunderaba<j, Telangana 50130'1. The HMDA, Hyderabad Metropolitan Developm-ent Authority, Block'A'. District Commercial Complex, Tarnaka, Hyderabad - 500007. Telangana, lndra Email. [email protected] in The CommisSioi-er, Nizlampet Municipal Corporation, Grama Panchayat Office. Praqathi Naqar, Medihal-Malkaigiri District, Telangana 500090 The Execuiive Engineer, lrrigation Dep-artment, I\Iedchal-Malkajgiri District - 500082 The Tahsildar, Bachupally Village and Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana 500090

9. The Metropolitan Commissioner, Hyderabad Disaster Response and Assets Protection Agency (HYDRA), MA and UD, Secretariat, Hyderabad '10. The Chief Engine'er, lrrigation, Hyderabad, Errumanzil. 1 1. The Superintdnding En{ineer, lrrigation Circle, Red Hills, Hy-derabad . ,12,One Cb to SRI" KA-MBALAPALLI SRAVAN KUMAR REDDY,AdVOCAIC 13.Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE,High Court for the State of Telangana at IOPUCI Hyderabad [OUT]

14.Two CCs to' GP FOR IRRIGATION, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] '15 One CC to SC FOR CENTRAL GOVERNMENTIOPUCI l6 One CC to Ms D MADHAVI, SC FOR HMDA [OPUC] 17.One CC to SRl. K RAVINDER REDDY, SC FOR HYDRAA [OPUCI '18.One CC to SRl. ROHIT POGULA, Advocate [OPUC] '19.One CC to SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IOPUC] 20.Two CD Copies BM . ,BS ,/ I I I I I I 4l HIGH COURT DATED:071OT12025 I l ORDER WP.No.35954 of 2024 '3 o t 4 t:l . r l\" ,1i1. .\\ (,, l \ r i ,..1 0I sEr 2c25 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

4.< I zz l,/7 I {6 i ,