Abdul Raheem v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
for the petitioner, this Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 0404. Oc,nsidering the submission of the' learne,l counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the appea::ance of the petitioner-accused No.2 before the learned trial Cc,urt unless his presence is specificalll required during the cotLrse of trial, subject to the r:ondition…
Judgment
Petition under Section 528 OF BNSS,2023 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/Accused. no. 2 in S.C. No- 40 of 2023 on the file of the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge Court-Cum-Assistant Sessions Judge Court At Adilabad, l.A. NO: 1OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in S.C. No. 40 of 2023 on the file of the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge Court-Cum-Assistant Sessions Judge Court At Adilabad, including the appearance of the petitioner, pending disposal of the above Criminal petition This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri SOMA RAVI KIRAN REDDY ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER -! { j THE HONOIJRABLE SMT. JUSTICE JTIWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.15871 of 2o24 ORDER This Cr: minal Petition is filed by the petitione r-accused No.2 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in S.C.No.4O \ of 2023 pending on the f,rle of the learned Senior Civil Judge- cum-Assistant Sessions Judge at Adilabad (for shorr- learned trial Court').
#02. Heard Sri Soma Ravi Kiral Reddy, learned colrnsel for the petitioner ald Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State
#03. Though this Crimina-l Petition is filed lor quashing the proceedings, during the course of arg-rments learned counsel for the petitioner has restricted his prayer to the extent of dispensing u'ith the presence of the petitioner-accused No.2 before the learn,:d trial Court.
#04. Oc,nsidering the submission of the' learne,l counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the appea::ance of the petitioner-accused No.2 before the learned trial Cc,urt unless his presence is specificalll required during the cotLrse of trial, subject to the r:ondition of the .1 2 petitioner-accused No.2 being represented by his counsel on every date of hearing. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTIO OFFICER To, ,1'TheSeniorCivilJudgeCourt-Cum. AssistantSessionsJudgeCourtAdilabad ,. ,?'E 3?1 ,"" House officer, Adilabad -l rown Police Station Adilabad 3. oH'# to sRl. SoMA RAVI KIRAN REDDY Advocate [oPUC] District
4.TWoCCstothePUBL|CPRoSECUToR,HighCourtfortlleStateof feiangana, at HYderabad [OUT]
#5. Two CD CoPies (Y HIGH COURT DATED:0210112025 ORDER CRLP.No.1587'l ot 2024 a _o) )li o t- .--= o t\) E \l DI o 1\ n ) /> ,c ) :_ DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION a*d*b Yff5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: for the petitioner, this Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.