High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constiiution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to pass a Writ, Direction, Order or Orders more particularly one ln the natureWritofMandamusdeclaringtheactionofRespondentshereinmore particularly 3rd Respondent herein i e., Station House Offrcer, Malkajgiri Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate in conttnuous calling tlre Petitioner to the Police Station, harassing, threatening to implicate in fals: criminal cases, pressurizing to settle the matter with the Unofficial Respon(le nts and interfering with the Petitioner's personal life and liberty civil disputes rs as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Iaw and violation of Articles '14, 15, 16 and 21 of Ccnstitution of lndia and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to harass :a ll the Petitioner to the Police Station, not to threaten, not to pressurize to settl€ the matter with the Unofficial Respondents and not to interfere with the Petiti,rner's personal life, liberty or civil disputes without following due process of larv, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circrrnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court n ay be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent not to harass, call the Petitioner to ihe Police Station, not to threaten, not to pressurize to settle the matter r,rrith the Unoffirial Respondents and not to interfere with the Petitioner's person;tl life. Iiberty or civil disputes without following due process of law, pending dispo;zrl of the main Writ Petition, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s.R.SHANTHI 'r Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : ASST. GP FOR HOM: Counsel for the Respondents No.4to8 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR IVRIT PETITION No.35O73 of 2o25 ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposai.

2. This writ petition has been filed queslioning the action of respondent No.3 in continuously calling the petitioner to the police station, harassing, threatening to implicate in false criminal cases, pressurizing to settle the matter with the un-ofhcial respondents and interfering with the petitioner's personal life and liberty and civii disputes as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of Articles 14, 15, 16 and 21 of Constitution o1 India and seeking a consequentiai direction to the 3.d respondent not to harass, call the petitioner to the Poiice Statron, not to threaten, not to pressurize to settle the matter with the un-offlcial respondents a.rd .r8t to interfere with the petitioner's personal life, liberty or civil disputes without following due process of law.

3. Learned Assistant GovernmenL Pleader for Honte has placed the instructions of Sub-Inspector of Police, Malkajgiri Police Station wherein it is submitted that 4e respondent has lodged a complaint against the petitioner with the 3'd respondent on 31.1O.2O25 stating that the petitioner and others cheated the complainant, trespassed, forged the documents and threatened. Subsequent to filing of the said I I I .,i 2 \l - complaint, petition entry was made. During the co 1r.se of inquiry, 3.0 respondent issued notice to complainan[ on o3.1l.r]02s and obtained relevant documents. Further, 3.d respondent callec the petitioner for the purpose of inquiry, subsequently, on 05.7I.2025 the petitioner attended without documents and further on 13.11.2025 the petitioner and submitted documents. After comp k:tion of inquiry, attended the 4ff respondent to approach the co I oetent Court or for redressal and closed the said coml>l:rint as ,civil in nature' on 15. lL.2O2S and the samc \4,as inlbrrtred to the 4ft respondent through notice as well as petition Manag.rrre nr Svstem. authority suggested

4. Learned Assistant Government pleader lor Ho.r: submitted that after completion of enquiry, the complaint of the 1ur rcspondent is closed as 'civil in nature, and the respondent autjtorities neither threatened nor pressurized the petitioner to settle the r)tatter.

5. Per contra learned counsel for the petitioner sr,lbmits that the petitioner was made to sit in the police station on c 5. I r .2o2s and again on 13.11.2025. However, submits that petirioner had given a complaint to the Sub-Inspector of police, Malkajgiri I,o lice Station/3ra respondent agarnst one Mohan Sharma and his hin:l..men for giving life threats, warnings and doing conspiracy against the petitioner and the said complaints were forwarded by e_ma I to Assistant Commissioner of police, Rachakonda Commissionerat e and Deputy Commissioner of police, Rachakonda Commissioneratc. \ \ J

6. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with consent directing the respondent authorities to take appropriate action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 10. ll.2}25 and grant police aid to the petitioner on need and necessity basis by strictly following the due procedure as contemplatcd under law.

7. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of' No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed' //TRUE COPY// SD/.MOHD. ISM D UTY R R CTION OFFICER To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabgd, Telangana State Telangana. \'. Secretariat,

2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate' 3. The Sub lnspector of Police, Sunil Kumar, Malkaigiri Police Station' RachakondaCommissionerate.

4. One CC to M/s.R,SHANTHI, Advocate. [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME. High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT] 6. Two CD CoPies. a BSK BS HIGH COURT DATED:1911112025 ORDER WP.No.35073 of 2025 \1o// e n4, E17 !) t- '\ /, \, ,25il0Um sPArcsEg t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS rt\rK-