The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, Through SHO, P.S. Kazipet, Hanumakonda District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. Keerthi Sunitha, W/o. Ramesh, Age. 48 years, Occ. Tailor, R/0. H. No 4-7-9, Kumarpally, Market Road, Hanumakonda, Hanumakonda District. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in C.C. No.6795 of 2022 on the file of lst Additional Judicial First Class of Magistrate at Hanumakonda, against the Petitioners/Accused no. 2 and 10. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the Petitioners/Accused No. 2 and '10 in C.C. No. 6795 of 2022 on the file of lst Additional Judicial First Class of It4agistrate at Hanuma < >nda. in the interest of justice pending disposal of the criminal petition. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Between: Keerthi Sunitha, W/o Ramesh, Age. 48 years, Occ. Ta i :r, R/o. H. No 4-7-9, Kumarpally, lrlarket Road, Hanumakonda, Hanumakonc i District. ...PETITIONI: I/2"d RESPONDENT AND 1 The State of Telangana, Through SHO, P.S. Kazipet, 11 rnumakonda District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the S t rte of Telangana at Hyderabad

2. Mallamari Lingamurthy, S/o Retired Employee, R/o. H.No Hanumakonda District. (A.2) ..,RESPON t ENT/RESPONDENT Mallamari Mankaiah, lr te. 65 Years, Occ. 1-1-1217, Siddardhnaga -. Babucamp, Kazipet,

3. Mallamari Sampath Kumar, S/o. lt4allamari Lingamurthy, Age. 41 Years, Occ. Employee, R/o. H.No 1-1-1?17, Siddardhnagar, .azipet, Babucamp, Hanumakonda Drstrict.(A. 1 0) ,..RESPONIIl :NTS/PETITIONERS Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that irthe circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition :he High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners and the 2nd responder and be pleased to allow the above Criminal Petition by quashing the proceed r gs in C.C.No.6795 of 2022 on the file of lst Additional Judicial First Class Magi; rate, Hanumakonda against the petitio ners/Accused no. 2 and '1 0. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that i the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminat Petition .he High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to record the compronri ;e entered between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and be pleased o allow the above Criminal Petition by quashing the proceedings in C.C.No. 3 /95 of 2022 on the file of lst Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Hanurr akonda against the petitioners/Accused no. 2 and 10. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the l\/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S. Surender Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner, Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri Chokki Narender, Advocate for the Respondent No.

2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF T]];ANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREEI IVAS RAO LA.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O25 IN AND CRIMINAL PETITION No. 15174 of 11 125 Date: O3.12.2O25 Between : Mallamari Lingamr-rrl,hv and another PetiLroners/ Atr() lsed Nos.2 and 1O AND The State of Telangana, through Sl{O, P.S. Kaztpet, Flanumakonda District, rep. b1, its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana ar I'{yderabad, and another Itespondents COMMON ORDER: ' 'I'his Crinrin:rl Petition has been filed by Lhc r; t itio ners / accused Nos.2 and 10 seeking to quash Ltre procccdings r C.C.No.6795 of

2022. on the file oI the I Additional Judicial I,'irs- Class Magistrate, Hanumakonda.

2. Mr. S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel f,r the petitroners, submitted that during the pendency o[ lhe prcscn Oriminal Petilion, at the instance of the well u,ishers. relatives anrl , Iders, the par[ies have settled the dispute and entered comprorr i ; : and filed .loint Memo. Accordingll,, respondcnt No.2 filed LA.Nos 2 a ud 3 of '2025 --I 2 seeking permission to compromise the matter and to record the compromise entered betu,een them respectively.

3. This Courr uide or<)cr, dated 19. 11..2025, directecl the partics i.e., lhe petitioners and respondent No.2, to appear before the IIigh Court Legal Seruices Committee, Hl,dcrabad, on or before 26.11.2O2:). In compliance of the said order, the Secretary, High Court Legal Scrvices Commiruce, hzrs submittcd rcport, dated 24.1 1.2025, stating that the petitioners and respondcnt No.2 were dury identifred u,ith copies ol rheir Aadhar carcis. rt is furLher stated that the pzrrtres have u'itlfutll,and r,'".i[hout anr, cocrcion cntered into comprornisc. 1 Lcarned counscl appcaring for rcspondent No.2 has not opposed the sam6

5. The parties herein hzrve filccl ,Ioint Mcmo along with LA.No.3 of

2025. Thc said Joinl Mcmo and the report of the Secretary, Telangar-ra Fligh Courrt Legal Scrvices Committee, Hyderabad, are placecl on record.

6. In vieu, of the said rcport and also in view of the compromisc entered between the pe[itioner and responclent No.2 as well as the submissions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the proceedings in C.C.No.6795 of 2022, on the flle of the I Additionai .Iudicial First Class Magistrate, Hanumakonda, are hereby quashed against the petitioners. -)

7. Accordingly, the Crimir-ral pctition is alloncr_l ;ub-ject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand o:r I) and Rs.S,OOO/- (Rupees five thousand only) to thc Telangana [-] i: I C,Jurt AdvoeaLes Association, Hvderabad. by the petitioners ro tr r fllgh Court Legal Services CommitLee, rviLhin onc r,veek lrom Lodar.. Miscellaneous applications, pending if anv, s,. ,rll srancl closed //TRUE COPY// Sd,. T.SRINIVAS REDDY ASS; STANT REGISTRAR -.,,.. ''37. SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The I Additional Judicial First Class lr,4agistrate, HanumrLt onda 2. The Station House Officer, Kazipet poliie Statir:n, Warar Eal City 3. Two ccs to the pubric prosecutor, High court for the t iate oi Terangana at 4. One CC to Sri S. Surender Reddy, Advocate [OpUC] 5. One CC to Sri Chokki Narender, Advocate tO'pUCl 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad.[OUT] (Along with a copy of Joint l\/emo) VH/BA NOTE: Total Amount of Rs. .15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen thousanrl by Sri S. Surender Reddy, Counsel for the petitioner as dire Court vide order dated 03.12.2025 as Rs. 1 0,000/_ ( Rupees Te the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabarl proof of compliance USR No. 143362 of 2025, dated 10_12-2 (Rupees Five thousand only) to The High Court Legat Services; Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 1987 of 2026 dated 07- rnly ) has been paid :ted by the Hon'ble -r thousand only ) to and filed Memo as 125 and Rs. 5,0001 lommittee and filed )1-2026 HIGH COURT DATED: 0311212025 COMMON ORDER l.A. NOs: 2 AND 3 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.15174 of 2025 oR TI-E S i4 ( 1 I lAil 2i)$ -)- * d r-C!4 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION ,1 1 N4EMORANDTJM OF CzuMINAL PETITION MISC. PETITION I.'ILED UNIIER SECTION 359 r/r.v 528 OF BNSS Ir\ THr. IIIGII COURT FOR TIIII S lA'fE OF TELANGANA A1' HYDER,\II,\D I.A.NO oF l()2 5 t\ CRI,P NO L,,-\ oF 2025 t4 ))< r BIil'WL1EN Mallamari Lingamurthy, S/o. It4allanruri \4ankaiah, Age: 65 Years, Occ: Retired Emplol,cc, tuo. H.No. I - l -l2l1,Siddardhnagar, Babucamp, Kazipct. Hanuntakonda I)istrict. ({2)

2. Mallamari Sarnpath Kumar, S,/o. Mullanrari l-ingamLrrthv, Age: 41 Years, Occ: Implo;,cc, IVo. H.No. l-l -1211 , Siddardlinagrir, Kazipet, Babucamp, Flanumakonda I)istrict. . ... Petitioncrsi Accusc:d 2 & l0 (A.10) AND l The State o1'Telangana, 'l'hrough SHO, P.S. Kazipel, Hanumakonda District, Rep. by its .r'ublic Prosecutor, High Courl lor the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. Keerthi Sunitha, Wo. Ramesh, Age; 48 years, Occ: Tailor, R/o. H. No 4-7-9, Kumarpally, Market Road, Hanumakonda, Hanurnakonda District. .. .. Responclcnt .... Respondents/Respondents JOINT MEMO FILED BY THF, Ph''fI IIONER & 2ND RIISPONDNE'I l. It is subrnitted that, the above (.rirninal Quash Petition is filed to quash proceedings in the Police, P.S. Kazipet, I'lanumakonda District have registered a case in Cr.No. 172 of 2019 Lrnder Sections 468, 420, 471, 44'7, 421 ,506 rlw. 1.20 (B) of IPC against thc pcl.itioners and othcrs basing on the ftilse complaint given by the delacto-cornplarnant on 27.01i.2019, u hcrcin M.)- @r}t? R.s;h_ i the petitioners \\crc shorvn as accused 2 & 10. f conductlng prollel irlvestigation, filcd the charge slrr:' r vide C Cl. of 2022 for the sanrc oflcrlces and the satne is penciir I tbr tnal llon.lrlc f?'AA..f f JLrttici.l Irirst Class Magistrate a[ Il; r It.aliotrda s. [- before lt is hu'tirc| subnritlcd that subseqtletltl-v tlrc t l ' ''s ;ttltl ii cll u ishers l. ol- both the parties sLlggcstcd them io comprolllistj tlti I lrttlct 11i11 11i i lsri rli' their intcn,ention ol both the parties i.e. petitioners I r il thc 1"'r rcspondent hercin have colnpfolniscd the matter befbre thc i :ll r, ishers ancl tltc ntemoranclum ol irntlcr.s tan d ing was aLso a \.(. iltc(l Ir.'tu'cctt tlle pclitiLrnersiAcclLscd no. 2 & 10 and the 2"d rcsllolrtl, r t. itl rrhich borh thc parties agreed to withclrar,v l"he cases pending agaillsl -'rch .thcrs.'fheLelbrc it,r pursuance o I thc abovc said settlement, thc ' f csll(]llclcllt has tlo olr.icction to quash thc procccding's againsl the pctrtr ' 'crs rtccttscd ntr' I & l0 hcrein. ln r terr ol tho compromise betii'eett tlrt rltrtit-s it is -1ust artd llecessary to quash the proceedings agasint the pctili' 'r r'r'si Accuscd Llo 2 & 10 by recording thc cornpromise or else thc 1-t itioners rvill suflcr irrcparabl,v. iror all thc reasons stated above, it is thcr', rrc prat,ed that this Hon'bLe court may be pleased to permit thc pct toners to rccord thc compromise cntered bct,nvecn thc pctitioners and t rl . I re sllorldcnt and bc ltleased to allori the above Criminal Petition by qurrsrr rs tirc proceedings tn C.C.\o. 6795 of 2022 onthe fite of Hon'ble lS.,t t Litional .luclicial Irirst Ctass Magistrate, llanumakonda against the petitioncr rrAccused no 2 & l0 in thc interest ofjustice and pass such other order or' ,rders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances t I lltc case' ./. rv\ ,t_ \<.srlh- \< (;lh M) fu^\ Signature olthe 2"d Rcspondent S Lgnaturc ol' the petitioners CoLrnsel for t -2-.-- respondcnl CoLLnse I lirr th.- ctrIroners I);tc:\O-11.2025. Place: Ilyderabad