The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the Respondent Nos.2 & 4 herein, in not initiating any action upon the online application No.250002S319 dated 23.04.2025 submitted by the Petitioner for mutating the name of the Petitioner in Bhu Bharathi Portal pertaining to land in Sy.No.31i & 3i 3 to an total extent of 4c.1O.21 guntas, situated at Lingojiguda Village, Choutuppal Mandal, Yadadri Bhongiri District is illegal arbitrary, violative Principles of natural justice and against the Article 14, 19,21 86 300-(4), Constitution of lndia and to consequently direct the Respondents herein to consider Petitioner's online application No.2500025319 dated 23.04.2025 submitted by the Petitioner for mutating the name of the Petitioner in Bhu Bharathi Portal pertaining to land in Sy.No.31 1 & 313 to an total extent of Ac.10.21 guntas, si :ated at Lingojiguda Village, Choutuppal Mandal, Yadadri Bhongiri District lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High co r t may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to consider petitioner: ontine application No.2500025319 dated 23.04.202s submitted by the petiri: rer for mutating the name of the Petitioner in Bhu Bharathi portal pertaining tr and in Sy.No.311 & 313 to an total extent of Ac.10.21 guntas, situated at -ingojiguda Village, Choutuppal Mandal, Yadadri Bhongiri District, pending disp ,sal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. J. RAGHURAM Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGp FOFI 1EVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No .35018 of2025 ORDER: . This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:- "...to issue a Writ, Order or Dircction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent Nos.2 & 4 herein in not initiating any action upon the onlinc application No.2500025319, dated 23.O4.2025 submitted by the Petitioncr for mutating the name of the Petitioner in Bhu Bharathi Portal pertaining to land in Sy.No.3l I & 313 to a totat extent of Ac.l0.2l guntas, situated at Lingojiguda Village, Choutuppal Mandal, Yadadri Bhongiri District is illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principlos of natural justice and against the Article 14, 19. 2l , 86, 300A. of Constitution of India and to consequently direct the Respondents herein to consider Petitioners onlinc application No2500025319 dated 23.O4.2025 submittcd by the Petitioner for mutating the name of the Petitioner in Bhu Bharathi Portal pertaining to land in Sy.No.3l I & ill b a total extent of Ac.10.21 guntas situated at Lingojiguda Village, Choutuppal Mandal, Yadadri Bhongiri District ..."

2. Heard Mr. J.Raghuram, learned counsel fbr the petitioner, Mr. L.Ravinder, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. I to 4. Perused the record. .- 2

3. With the consent of both the parties, this writ pe .ition is being disposed of at the stage of admission.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the earlier round of correspondence, the respondent No.4 has adJ'essed a letter vide No.A/l51412022, dated 31.12.2022 to the Srr rject-Treasury Officer, Rammannapet, seeking to fumish details of c rallans where the petitioner has claimed that the petitioner's la rd has been regularized vidc l3-B Certificate Proc. No.H/86 '1989, datcd

28.09. 1989 and 1118111989 Dated 28.09.1989 and lutated vide Amendment Nos.99/1988-89 and 100/1988-99, but thc rahanies were not fumished. He would submit that it has already be: rstaled in lhe said communication to the Sub-Treasury Officer, thal he said l3-B certificate files bearing Nos.tV86/1989 and Hl87l1! 89 were not traced, as the respondent No.4 office was inundated twic : in floods lor the year 2006 and 2020 and some records were darra;ed. In such circumstances, he requested the Sub-Treasury Officer t r verify 13-A challan details lbr the years 1989 to 1991 and to prc vide the said details on the name of Sri Bazaru Bheemaiah if any fir nd in respect of Survey No.3l I and 313 for taking necessary actio r. In the said communication, no details of the challans have been f -r 'nished to the I J Sub-Treasury Officer. However, the petitioner has made application dated 23.04.2025, by paying requisite fee for correction of missing survey numbers. Thus, he would seek to pass appropriate direction.

5. Learned Assistant Govemment pleader for Revenue would submit that firstly, the petitioner is making this apptication for missing survey number which does not form any basis for consideration and the petitioner is not able to furnish the details of the said amendment i.e, l3-B certificates on which the petitioner is claiming the property. In the absence of any such documents, the offlcial respondents are not in a position to consider the case of the petitioner unless the petitioner submits the necessary documentary proof stating that the land has been regularized vide 13-B certificates. However, he would submit that the necessary communication has been addressed to Sub-Treasury officer vide Lr.No.A/15t412022, dated 31.12.2022 and still it is awaited and as when the communication is received by the said authority necessary action wouid be undertaken by respondent No.4 and accordingly, would be communicated to the petitioner herein.

6. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel and upon considering the material available on record, without going into the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it 4 appropriate to direct the official respondents to obtair: he status of the letter addressed to the Sub-Treasury Ofhcer datecl : 1.12.2025 vide Lr.No.N15l412022 and after obtaining the sair sratus, pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law. 7 Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 'l rere shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall str rd closed. sD/- ) ABDULLAH KHAN-- ----'-'=::+ SI4NffiEGTSTRAR To, //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER n*' \/

1. The Principat Secretary Revenue Department SecrEtari: Buildings , T.S,Hyderabad Bhongiri District.

2. The District Collector, Yadadri Bhongiri District. 3. The Sub-Registrar, Choutuppal Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District. 4. The Tahsildar -cum- Joint Sub-Registrar, Choutuppal IVz rdal, Yadadri 5. One CC to SRl. J. RAGHURAM Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the St I e of Telangana at 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] BtV BS HIGH COURT DATED:1811112025 ) ORDER WP.No.35018 of 2025 :.- "'\-:. .\ 2t] l:t, 2rm DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS )n Ita {