The High Court · 2025

3. The Commissioner of police, Warangal Commrssionerate, Warangal. 4 The Assistant commissioner of poiice, lvattewada porice Stalion, warangar 5. The Station House Officer, I\zlattewada police Stalion, Warangal. O [ytr !q[uq Surender, S/o..Late Sri Rajaiah, Aged abour 6t y"rrr, R/o Viila No. 167. Ramky Enclave. t,tear nzam jani vir"lrlWa"rrngar. I ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit titeo treiewitn, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction, n,or"!".ti"ri"rrv oie in the nature of writ of mandamus, decraring the inaction or nesponoentJ r,"Li, more particurarry Respondents Nos.3 to 5 herein, in not registeii"i-1n-rrn against the unofficiar Respondent No. 6 herein and providing po'ii"" pri""tion to Petitioners, basing on the complaints dated 12.06.202s and 08.10.2025 submitted by the petitioners herein as iIegar, unrawfur, arbitrary, untenabre, :?nifary 10_ the statutory duties cast upon thl statutory Authoritiei, v;orative ot Rights of Persons with Disabirities Act, 20'r 6, to the provisions of the BNS Act, 2023 and BNSS Act, 2023 and viorative of Articres r+, rg i zr oi in" "ontrrry :1.; .. lndian Constitution and Consequen y direct the Respir particularly Respondents Nos.3 to 5 hereinto forthwith irrr FIR against the unofficial Respondent Nos.6 herein and pro Protection to the Petitioners herein, basing on the compla and 08.10.2025 submitted by the petitioners herein in accor interest of justice. dents herein more red iately register an ide adequate Police rt dated 12.06.2025 ance with law tn the lA NO: 'l OF 2025 .Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the r rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High coLrr may be pleased to direct the official Respondents more particularly Responder s Nos.3 to 5 herern to immediately act upon the complainl daled 12.06_202t and 08.10.2025 by enquiring and investigating into the matter in accordan; r with law pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the : rcurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High coL.r may be pleased to direct the official Respondents to immediately deploy r rtice personnel for protection at Petitioners' residence situated at H. No. 8-1i.151, 2,,c Floor, JpN Road, Warangal, Telangana and business premises situat,r I at H. No. j2_1_15 SVN Road, Warangal, pending final disposal of this petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Y. RAMA RAO & ASSOCIAII S Counsel for the Respondent No.'l to 5: ASST. Gp FOR HOf\l : Counsel for the Respondent No.6: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER I / THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N'V'SHRAVAN KUMAR WRTT PETITION No.35O38 of 2A25 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for [he petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. With their consent this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself' Notice to respondent No.6 is hereby dispensed with'

2. This writ petition is fiLed sceking tbllou'ing prayer:- ". ..to issue an appropriate lDit or order or direction, more particularlg one in Lhe rutture of tuit of mand.amus, declaring the tnaction oJ Respondents herein more particularlg l?espondents -lfos 3 to 5 herein,innotregistenngantFlRallainsLtheunofficial Responderut /[o. 6 hereirt and' prouiding police protection to Petitioners, basing on tlrc complaints dated 12.06.2025 and 0B'1O 2u25 submitted bg tle illegal, unlatufu| arbitrary' Petitioners herein as untenable, contrary to the slGlutory duties cast upon the Statutory Authoities, uioLatiue of Rights of Persons utithDisabilitiesAct,2016,contrargtotheprouisions of the BNS Act, 2023 ancl B/YSS Acf' 2O23 and uiolatiue of Aiicles 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution and Consequently d'irecL the Responderis herein more particuLcrly l?esltondents l[os- 3 to 5 Lrcreinto forlhrt-tith imne<Ji'ttely reqister an FIR against the unofficial Respondenl ly'os 6 herein and prouide I I ] I I I 2 adequate police protection to the petitiott zrs herein, ba-s,ing on the complaint d.ated 12.t) j.202Sattd OB.1O.2O2S submitted bg the petitioner:: herein in accordance u.tith lata in the interest of -it stic:e and pass... " l j I : I a .J workers. petitioner Nos. I and Satish, a person rvith BO% poliomyelitis, u,ho Briel facts of the case as stated are that pe1 tior.rer No.3 is a womqn entrepreneur managing Isha Silks/Srini,z rsa Enterprises at H.No.I2-t-1S SVN Road, Warangal, empk,. ing nearly 10 2 assist their f:l I cr, Sri Gunda locomotor dis; rilily d ue to rs permanently confined to a rr teelchair. It is further submitted that the petitioners have beer continuoush, subjected to acts of harassment, intimidation ancl nental crueltv by respondent No.6 herein, who jd under gurr : of political influence, has been interfering with their peac:lul life and business of the petitioner since 2024. Itis further ; rbmitted that the respondent No.6 and the father of the petitiont:r Nos. 1 and 2 were earlier associated in the construction busirr:ss and had jointly undertaken the development of an apartrr: :n t complex situated in the O. City area of Warangal. in thc said project petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 w,ere the partners with resp < ndent No.6. The said project u,as dul,y completed, and certain ,1 sputes that arose between them 1n connection with the said and partnership dissolvecl r onstruction n the year i amicably resolved J 20 15. Subsequent to the saicl dissolution of partnership, there had been no further contact, communication or business association whatsoever between respondent No.6 and the petitioners. However, respondent No.6 who is known to habituaily indulge in acts of coercion and blackmail, particularly targeting affluent individuals, began resorting to intimidation and extortionate tactics. Utilizing his political influence and connections, he attempted to harass and coerce the petitioners in I various ways. The complaints lodgecl by petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 before the respo4dent Nos.4 and 5, ciearly substantiate the unlawful, intimidating, and blackmail oriented conduct of respondent No.6, thereby exposing his malicious intent ald continuous engagement in illegai activities. Questioning the same the present writ petition is filed.

4. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pieader, on instructions, would submit that respondent authorities u,ill consider and proper action would be taken -

5. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on either side, this writ petition is dlsposed of directing the respondent authorities to act upon the complaint of the petitioners and take appropriate action w'ithin a period of two 4 (02) weeks from the clate of receipt of copy of tI is order strictlv in accordance with law.

6. With the above directions, this writ petir irn is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, -.] all stand closed. No order as to costs. DIJ $r; A .P. PONNA KRISHNA STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Principal Secreta ry, Home De artment, The St4te p retariat, H yd erabad, Telangana Deputy I nspector General of Police, Telanga .b st dquarte rs, Hyderabad Commissioner of police . Warangal Commissioneri Assista nt Commissione r of Police, Mattewada poli Station House Officer [\rlattewa da Police Station, \ CC to SRI Y. RAIVA RAO&A SSOCIATES , Advoc CCs to Gp FOR H OME, High Court for the State c CD Copies i { I t SECTION OFFICER f Telangana, e, Police :, Waranoal. r Station. Warangal rrangal. le [OPUCI felangan;. [OUTI To, 1 2 4

6. 7. B. rl . ry. The Sec The Hea The The The One Two Two BN GJP I / I I l l l l I I I i i l l HIGH COURT DATED:2411112025 ( ORDER WP.No.35038 of 2025 ii'trt.rr, ( \)a ,J \-1() 'l$ EEC 2sfr ,rr'' l l l I I l l DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \v