1 . Sunke Miava Nirmala v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction'more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 6 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, Part of H No.2-56l4/8, on Plot No.89, in Survey No.11l31, admeasuring 528 Sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North- Plot No.94 South- Road East- Plot No.88 West- Plot Nos.90 AND 91., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive application and to release the individual service connection without being influenced by the instructions of the 7th respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 6 to receive the application and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, Part of H No.2-561418, on Plot No.89, in Survey No.11131, admeasuring 528 Sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North- Plot No.94; South- Road; East- Plot No.88; West- Plot Nos.90 & 91. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondents No.l : GP FOR ENERGY cou nse I for Res po nde nts N o.2to6 : t$| ts[?=rrr[t[ RE DDY, Counselfor Respondent No.7 : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the foltowing: ORDER t THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.35OO3 Of' 2O2S ORDER: Petitioners seeking a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 6 in not receiving their application for electricity connections to their propert5r bearing Part of H.No.2-56 1418, Plot No.89, in survey No.11/31, admeasuring 528 square yards, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Undder GHMC, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Heard Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Energr on behalf of Respondent No.1, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 to 6 and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.7 - Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in somewhat similar circumstances, while dealing with writ Petition No. 2Ol2L of 2025, this Court by order dated L4.O7.2025 directed the respondents authorities therein to release the seryice connection, subject to the compliance of the statutory requirements by the petitioner therein, and hence, requested this Court to pass similar order in the present Writ Petition also. * i*':.' 2 'r' .\ 4' Recently, the Hon'bre supreme court in Rajendra Kumqr Bartatga t. U.p. Aaas Eaam Vikas parisnad, , in the larger public interest, issued directions in addition to the directives issued in Re: Directions in the matter of demorition of structures. Relevant for the purpose of this case are: "(iv) All the necessary service connections, such as, Electricity, water supply, sewerage connection, etc., shall be given by the service provider / Board to the buildings onry after the production of the completion / occupation certificate. (v) Even after issuance of ccmpletion certificate, deviation / violation if any contrary to the planning permission brought to the notice of the authorit5r imrnediate steps be taken by the said authorit5r concerned, in accordance with law, against the builder / owner / occupant; and the official, who is responsible for issuance of wrongfui completion / occupation certificate shall be proceeded departmentally forthwith (vi) No permission / licence to conduct any business / trade must be given by any authorities incruding local bodies of States / Union Territories in any unauthorised building irrespective of it being residential or commercial building. (vii) The development must be in conformitJr with the zonal plan land usage. Any modification to such zonal plan and usage must be taken by strictly following '2024 ine SC 3767 q 3 the rules in place.land in consideration of the larger public interest and the impact on the environment'. 5. since the prayer of the petitioners is to receive the application form and release individual service connection, this court without going into merits of the matter, directs the respondents to process the application of the petitioners and release individual service connection to the subject property, subject to the petitioners complying with the directions issued by the Hon,lrle supreme court in Raiendra Kumsr Bariatga's case (supra) and the statutory requirements prescribed by the local authorities

6. The writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if anY, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY" ' OFFICER To,

2. 3

4. District. ReddY District'

5.TheAsst.DivisionalEngineer'OperationKondapur'TGSPDCL'Ranga . r,i$'X;,:'' sE/oP/GHYD East AE oP Arrapur' r G s P Dc L' l:?ff'd:t;;} i I '$'fi3T$'"',,,;2*3'fi 31"-l"I{gEllisf"rvruniciparcorporation' 8. One CC to SRITHAKUR ROOPA SINGH' Advocate' IOPUC]

9. Two ccs to GP FoR ENERGY, High court for the State of retangana. tourJ 10. one cc to sRl N.SREEDHAR REDDY, sc FoR TGSPDCL. Iopucl 11. one cc to sRl G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, sc FoR GHMC. topucl 12.Two CD Copies. /) //I BSI(PMK k o HIGH COURT DATED :1Bt11t2l2s \ \ ORDER WP.No.3S003 of 2025 t-l ISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT \5 "d" S-" ! l, i I I I i i I \ a