The High Court · 2025

CounseI for the Petitioner: SRI T.P.ACHARYA Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR FIEVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.34955 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: "... to issue a utit or directiort, rnctre panlia.Llarly a uLit of mondamus declaing the action of the respondents in asking to uacete th.e house bearutg No.278 situated at R and R Colong, Mutrajpally, Gctjutel Manclal, Siddipet Distict tuithin tuo dags or else threaterittg to throttt them out of soid house without isst-tirtrT anq notice in uriting or giuing opporlunity to subtn[t petitioners explanation as arbitrary, illegal, uiolatiue of pirtciples of naturcLl justice and also Fundamental Right grartted under the Constitution of India a nd consequentlg direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner or her family from the house beaing No. 278 sittated at R and R Colony, Mutrojpally, Gajutel Mandal, Sicldipet Distict and pass..." ,

2. Heard Sri T.P.Acharya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for the respondents and perused the record

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the Government of Telangana had taken up a project ca11ed Kaleshwar-am Project and a part of that project Page 2 of6 \*- - Sri Komuravelly Mallanna Sagar Reservoir \vas to be constructed. In order to construct the sair:. Reservoir, ccrtain villagcs of Thoguta Mandal were subm e rged in that out of u,hich Etigaddakistapur is one of such r, llagc and the pctitioncr belongs to trtigaddakistapur vill: g,: and her husband is l-raving a house bearing No.8- t::i and also agricultural land to an extent of Acs. 12.00 gunla:;, u'hich got submerged 11-l the said reservoir. As t}-rc house and agricultural lands of the petitioner got sul,r.rcrged, the husband of the petitioner lrras issued r,r,itlL a primart' residential plot certificate uide No.Bl77 l'.1.(', 19, dated

28.O2.2O19 b1. respondent No.4 assuring to grant 250 sq.vards of plot to Mutrajpally/ Sangapur villag,.: of Gajrvel Mandal and other benefits as per the scheme t

4. Thereafter, when the family of the petitLtr.rer become houscless as they rracated from that village during 2022 and u,as facir-rg lot of problems to have accommodattcn and upon their request to grant benelits early, respondent Nc_4 handed over a vacant double bed room house constrlrcted by the Government, s'hich is in poor condition, but r c document 7', ,,/ Peq,r I ol'6 was issued allotting the said house. After receiving the entire beneficiary amount, the husband of the petitioner got constructed a house by demolishing the double bed room house and the family of the petitioner was residing there. There was no objection of any kind even not to construct the house at that place and there was no hint even stating that the said house was given to them temporarily. tf such hint was there, the petitioner and her lamily members ought not have invested such a huge amount and rt,ould not have constructed a house by spending all their hard earned money.

5. There is trlectricity connection to the said house with Service No.Ol25 00548, n hich the petitioner is qaving the bills. The husband of the petitioner died or 22.O3.2024. All of a sudden, one person namely Totla Kannaih had come to l the house of the petitioner and asked her to, vacate the house stating that the same was allotted to him. But the petitioner stated all the facts and protested his demand. Thereafter, respondent No.5 visited the house ol the petitioner and asked her to vacate the house. Then, the \ Pagc 4 of6 petltioner met respondent No.4 and stated tLLc said racts, respondcnt No.4 also asked to vacate the said ltr;use . Then, the petitioner categorically stated that the petitior_rer is reacl,v to vacate the house provided her good plots available for glvlng to the displaced persons under R & R also grant thc compensation of Rs. 16 lakhs sp,-nt by her husband for construction of the house. lfor urr-ricr-r, respondent No.4 stated that he cannot assu:o all those things and thosc things would be seen later or r rvhen time permits but the petitioner and her family memlrers have to vacate. p.rckage and

6. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner submitted representation dated Al.Og.2O2S to responde l, No.2 in Prajavar-ri and respondent No.2 endorsed th,: same to respondent No.3 on thc very same day and tlrr: same is pending. On 24.1O.2025, the petitioner srLl,mitted a representation to the Chief Minister in pra.1a,,ani. A Prajavani Receipt with Girevance ID GSDpT24lO2SOOOO2, datecl 24. ) O .2025 is also issued to the petitioner and the said representation is endorsed to the concernec ;ruthority l'age 5 ol6 and the same is also pending consideration. While the things stood, respondent No.5 visited the house ol the petitioner on 15. ll.2025 and asked the petitioner to vacate the house by evening of 17.1L.2025 or else they n'ould come on 18. ll .2025 and forcibly throw them out. The action of respondent Nos.4 and 5 is highly arbitrary, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice. Hence, the present u,rit petition.

7. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revcnue ',r,ould submit that without following due procedure laid dou,n under law, the respondent authorities will not take any ( I action. Hence, seeks to pass appropriate orders.

8. In the light of the aforesaid facts and circur4rstances of the case and upon perusing the material available on record, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondent authorities to take appropriate action by foilou'ing the clue procedure laid down under law, if the petitioner is found in the illegal possession or otherwise. There shall be no order as to costs .) l'agc 6 ol6 .\ As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if ar-ry, pencling, shall stand dismissed //TRUE COPY// S 'lAs ui-P.PoNNA KRt Ststnlrr npcrs SHNA To, , SECT|ON OFFTCER 1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Spcre,a.lat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana - 50O O22. \

2. The District Collector, Siddipet District, Siddipet - 50, - 03, Telangana State. 3. The Revenue ciivisionat officer, siddipet Division, sidcipet District - 502 103- 4. The Tahsildar, Gajwel Mandal, Gajwel - SO2 279, Siddicr,t District, T.S. 5. The Rev_enue lnspector, Gajwel Village and Mandrtl, Gajwel _ SOZ Zlg, Siddipet District.

6. One CC to SRt T P.ACHARYA, Advocate [OpUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

8. Two CD Copies BS9, 0 HIGH COURT DATED: 1811112025 ORDER WP.No.34955 of 2025 aa''.' _i' 14, i,t,.-) !1" \ "4, \r 2 5 t{0'l ffi (_ I * D€SpAfctl gO * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS \\ J