The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one.in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent authorities as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and procedure contemplated under the Law, and violative of Article 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to delete the Petitioner land of Sy.No. 4OlA1l1l2l2 an extent of Ac. 1-38 guntas, situated at Polkam Palli Village, Peda Adisherlapally Mandal, Nalgonda District, T.S in Prohibited list. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the Respondent No.2 to delete the Petitioner land in Sy.No. 4OlA1l1l2l2, an extent of Ac. 1-38 guntas, situated at Polkam Palli Village, Peda Adisherlapally Mandal, Nalgonda District, T.S., in Prohibited list. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. SANDHYA REP. FOR SRI J. TAJESWAR counsel for the Respondents: sRl L. RAVINDER, ASST. G r FOR REVENUE The Gourt made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.34897 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: '.--lo i-ssue dn oppropiate Writ Order or Direction ttbre parlk:ularLA one in tlrc ttature of Wnt of Mandamus to declare tlLe acLiod of tle resp<rndent authoilies as being ilLegal, arbitrarl1, uniust and procedure contemplated under the, lauo and uiolatiue of ArLicle 2 1 attd 3OO A of the Cblrslifulrort of India ond consequettlA direcl the Respondent No.2 to deletc llte. Pe.t.itioner Land of Sg. No.aO/A1/1/2/2,artextentof Ac.1.38 guttas sihtated at PoLkam Palli Vittage, Peda AdisherlapatllJ, Mattdal Nolqonde Dislrict, T.S. in Prohibited tist..."

2. Heard I\{s. Sandhya, learned counsel representing Mr.J.Rajeswar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L. Ravinder, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appea-ring for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Perused the record

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner \'vould submit that the petitioner is the bonafide purchaser of Agriculture land in Sy.No.40/A1 lll2l2, to an extent of Ac.l.38 guntas, situated at Polkampalli Village, Pedda Adisherlapalli Mandal, Nalgonda District through registered sale deed vide Doc No.122B of 2022 executed on 15.06.2022 frorn the title holder and possessor of the land in favour of whom the patteclar passbook has been issued vide pattedar passbook No.T2825008O641 vide Khata I t r I 2 No.60496. She would submit that the p': itioner is the bonafide purchaser by paying valuable sale cor sideration and the said document has becn duly registere < b1' the Sub- Registrar Oflicer, Pedda Adiserlapally, Nalg rnda District. Therea-fter, the petitioner had made an attemFl to register the property in favour of third party and approacl ed respondent No.3. Respondent No.3 had informed that thr subject land is kept under prohibitorl' list based upon the case in O.S.No.l22B of 2022 dated 18.08.2023. Sh: would submit that neither the petitioner, nor the vendor ol'L re petitioner is party to the said litigation and they have no kr< r,vledge on that said aspect. The petitioner sought details f- rm respondent No.3 that on r'vhat basis, the said propertv ras been kept under prohibition. But, he has failed to I rtain the said information.

4. She u,oulci further submit that aggrieved rv the action of respondent No.3, the petitioner has rr''c t e a detailed representation to respondent No.2 on 18.O8.12 )23 requesting to delete the subj ect land from the prohibito r , list. Despite receipt of the said representation, neither any i rformation has I 3 been provided to the petitioner, nor has any action been taken by the said authority for the grievance addressed by the petitioner. Aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.2, the present writ petition has been filed. Hence, she would seek to pass appropriate orders.

5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pieader for Assignment would submit that the petitioner ought to have examined the Court records as to on what point, the order has been passed by the competent Court and the official respondents rightly in compliance with the order passed in Court case in O.S. No. 1228 of 2022, had kept the property in question under prohibitory list. Therefore, no deliberate attempt can be averred as against the official respondents. She would further submit that the representation made by the petitioner r.r.ould be considered by the official respondents and upon examination of the same, necessary information shall be provided to the petitioner herein in due course of time. Hence, she would seek to pass appropriate orders.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment and upon 4 careful perusal of the material placed before his Court and without going into merits or demerits of the : r.se, this Court deems it appropriatc to direct respondent No.1) to examine the representation made by the petitioner herei r in detail by issuing notices to all concerned and affording .hem sufficient opportunity of hearing and pass appropriate or lers, strictly in accordance with ia',r,, preferably within a per.( d of sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this or 1er

7. With the above direction, this rvrit petitior is disposed of There shall be no ordcr as to€osts. As a sequel, the miscellar-reous petitions 1 ending, if any, shall stand ciosed //TRUE COPY// St).K.V.O. NARSI BABU /^$!; iISTANT REGTSTRAR -- \--::-::=: SECTION OFFICER I / r' To, Secretariat, Hyderabad, T.S. 1 . The Slate of Telangana, rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, 2 The District Collector, Nalgonda District, T.S. 3. The Tahasildar and JoiniRegistrar, p;daldisharla r rlli Mandal, Nalgonda District, T.S.

4. One CC to SRI J. RAJESWAR, Advocate IOpuCl 3. I#:3Sttlf,i FoR REVENUE, nign col'.t ro,.I'he St,r e or reransana [oUrJ BN PMK e-/, l { I i I HIGH COURT DATED:1811112025 ilE t or 4 ( i : lit 202[ z c t lrc'{€9 \ * o T. c /-r * ORDER WP.No.34897 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS KJ l I5 )-^