Smt. G.V. Satyavathi v. '1. Dappu Narasimha

2. Smt. C, Rani Wo. C.Y.Raju, aged about 39 years, Occ. Housewife, r/o. 1-5- ' 631141 , Ambedkar Nagar, Old Aiwal, Secunderabad. 3. Mugyari Venu, S/o. M. Jaihind, aged about 39 years, Occ. Business, r/o. 1-5- 387/4., Ambedkar Nagar, Old Alwal, Secunderabad.

4. Konduru Vijaya Lakshmi, D/o. K. Lakshmaiah, aged About 41 years, Occ. Business, rlo. 1-5-3141212, Suryanagar Colony, Near Bethany Schoot, Ambedkar Nagar, Old Alwal, Secunderabad.

5. G.Prasad, S/o. G. Eswar, aged about 49 years, Occ. Business, rto. 2-5-13, Balaji Rice lvlilla, Macha Bolaram, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. DANTU VENKATA RAMANA SARMA Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER \ a- THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE K. LAKSF MAN CIIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4179 Ci 2025 ORAL ORDER f{ealci Mr.D.V.Ramana Sarma. leamed co insel fbr the petr trone r

1.. t his Civil Revision Perition is fiied seeking a , ilection to the lealned Il Additionat Senior Civil Judge, Malkajli ii. Medchal - Malkajgiri District, to dispose of O.S.No.2145 of 2t) .Z filed by the petitioner against respondents fbr declaration of title .nd permanent injr-urction. in accoldance with law. as expeditioustl' rs possibte by fixing somc time frame

3. Perusal of the record would reveal that the peti :oner has flled the aloresaid suit in O.S.No.2l45 of 2022 against I e respondents secking declaration of title and permanent injun,: icn. It is the specific contention of the petitioner that respondent I o. I was set e-r parte tn the year 2023 itself and he has filed ar Interlocutory Application uirle LA.No.908 of 2024 before the lear red trial Court seelii.g to ser aside the said ex parte order antl c.nit rrirn to 2 contest the said suit. Though the said I.A. was flled in the year 2024,leamed trial Court is not disposing the said I.A. anci also the said suit, in accordance with law, as expeCitiousli as possible. 4 . During the course of hearing, it is also brought to the notice of this Court that defendant Nos.2 to 5 in the said suit were also set ex parte. They have not liled any application to set aside the said e-r parte ord,er. Therefore. petitioner seeks a direction to thc lcarned trial Clourt to dispose of the said I.A. by fixing tinie fiame

5. Perusal of the piaint filed by petitioner herein would reveal tlrat petitioner - plaintiff was aged about 54 years, r,vhile respondent No.l - defendant No.l was 73 years old as on the date of tiling of the said suit. They are now aged 57 years and 76 lears old respectively. They are senior Citizens. The suit is for declaration of title and perrnanent injunction. The year 1999 was observed as "lnternationai Year of Older Persons". In vier.v of the "National Policy fbr Older Persons" adopted by the Govemment of lndia, the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad issued a Circular vide ROC.No.4790/19991OP Cell-E. dated 02.11.1999 j directing all the Judicial Officers in the State to identi i'and dispose of rnatters in rvhich persons above "65 years" of aP( ':lre involved, on priorit,v basis. Suhsecluentl-v,-, erstwhile the High (1, trrl of Andhra Pradesh issucd CircLrlars vide ROC.No.3465/Il i2003, dated

05.12.2003, ROC.No.l230/OI'} Cell-E/2005,, dated .l r08.2005 and ROC.No.3465 lt-.-l 12003, dated 14. 12.2011 and the Iigh Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for tl.re States of Telangar- L and Andhra Pradesh vidc Circular in ROC.No.5226lOP Cell- l/2014, dated

20.12.2014, in which specitic instructions are issued r ; give prioriry to the cases relating to senior citizens for the expec i ious disposal. { ( in the light of the same, noticc to respondent No.1 -_ < ;fendant No.l is ri aived of bf irivoking pou'cr cf this Court under' / rtrcle - 227 ol' the Constitution of India.

6. In vieu' of the aforesaid discussion, this ( ivil Revision Petition is disposcd of directing learned II AdditiorLr I Senior Civil Judge, Malkajgiri, Medchal Malkajgiri District. ir dispose of I.A.No.908 of 2024 filed by respondent No.l tc, set aside the forfeiture ordcr dateci ).i.06.2.023 passed in O.S.Nc, 1145 of 2022, 4 n strictll in accordance with larv. AS expeditiously AS possible. prel-erably rvithirr a period of one ( I ) month frorn the date ol reccipt of a copy o1'tlris ordcr. l-'urthcr, leamcd trial Court shall inirke an cndearour to disposc of the said suit in O.S.No.2l45 ol 2022. in accordancc u ith law, as expeditiously as possible As a scclLre[ thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if an1 pending in thc ('ivil Rcr' ision Petition shall stand closed. Tl.rere shall be no ordcr as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/- A.JAYASREE ASSISTANTREGISTRAR Alz' SECTION OFFICER 1 \ \ To, 1 The ll Additional Senior Civil Judge, Malkajigiri, Malkajigiri Court Comptex, Malkajigiri-Medchal Drstrict.

2. One CC to SRl. DANTU VENKATA RAMANA SARMA Advocate IOPUC] 3. Two CD Copies PK/PSL g HIGH COURT DATED:21 11112025 \ CRP.No.4179 ot 2025 ; tHES t' lr,l ,,6 z..<. \.+' :.' t)r . ''.'. j r)ii 2 - ., ,r:l_t * CIVIL REVISION PEITITION IS DISPOSED OF ]IRECTING THE TRIAL COURT DISPOSE OF THE IA.NO.I 08 OF 2024IN OS.NO.2145 OF 2022 WITHIN A PERIOD OF r1 119 MONTH FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF COPY OF 'HIS ORDER. o) %