K. Hari Prasad v. 1. The State of Telangana
Case Details
7. Ram Mohan Rao, S/o. Late Ambali Rao, Age 68 years, Occ ; Agriculture^'.1/o ij. N". 5- 118, BJpuji Nagar, Maktiral, Nara-yanapbt District, Telangana State' 8. M. Kurumurthy, S/o. Mala Sayanna., Age 38 years, Occ ;Agriculture, R/o' H' - N;. il43, Miirtnangouo, Ma(that, Narayanapet Diskict, Telangana State' 9. Challa Sripal Reddy, S/o. Ananth Reddy, Age 42Y.ears, Occ; Buiiness' R/o' - H. No. f- 7, Cnattairhpalle, Faroognagdr, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State- 509216. l0.K.AnilKumarGoud,S/o.KAnjaneyuluGoud,Age3lyears,Occ;Software Engineer,R/o.H.No.3-gg,MainRoad,Manthagoud,Makthal'Narayanapet District, Telangana State.
11.Adama Laxmipathi Reddy, S/o. Damodhqr Reddy, Age 40 yeals' pgci,-.-,-. Business, R/o. H. No. 5- il1, Buchiguda, Faroognagar' Ranga Reddy ulslrrct' Telangana State. Baskar Goud, S/o. K. Janardhan Goud, Age 40 years' ()r;c , Business' R/o f.fo. +- tSS, Shabari Colony, Makthal, Narayanapet Dislri':t' Telangana 12K H S l3.EdigiBabitha,S/o.EdigiHanmanthGoud,Age32.years,()r:c;Business'R/o' - H. 1i.. 6-i90, trtantnadoua, Makthal, NarayanapefDistric , Telangana State. 14'K.RajenderGoud,S/o.KhajanGoud,Age33Lears'occAgriculture-,R/o.H' i.io,i:'i+, fi,tantnadouo, tvtaxinat, Narayanapet District, Telangana State
15.A. Navakanth Reddy, S/o. A- Narayana Reddy, Age 39 years, Occ; - nqriartirte, R/o. H. irlo. 1- 84, Adis-atyavaram, Maganoor' Narayanapet District, Telangana State. ,.,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia trraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Fligh court may be pleased to issue a direction, order or writ more particularly ore in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents No. 2 to 6, in trying to grant the DTCP Lay- out to the land of the petitioner i.e. t(,tal an extent of Ac. 15- 00 gts in Sy. No. 257,258,260,261 ,274'275,286, anl 287, situated at Makthal Village, Makthal Mandal, Narayanapet District, Telangana State, in favour of the Respondents No. B to 15, even civil litigation anl pending, as illegal and arbitrary, against the revenue laws and against principles of natural iustice and unconstitutional and consequently to direct the responde rts No. 2 to 6 not to grant the DTCP Lay- out to the land of the petitioner i.e. total a'r extent of Ac, 15- 00gtsinSyNo.257,258,260,261,274'275,286,and287s;ituatedatMakthal Village, Makthal Mandal, Narayanapet District, Telangana St,rte, in favour of the Respondents No. 8 to 15, until disposal of the partition suit .e o.S.No. 4112022 on the file of the Court of the District and Sessions Judge, Nallrayanapet' |.A.NO:1 OF 2022 petition Under Section 15i CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court ntay be pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 to 6 not to grant the DTCP Lay- out to the land of the petitioner ie total an extent of Ac. 15- 00 gts in sy. No. 257,258,260,261 ,274, 275' 286, and 287, situated at Makthal Village, Makthai Marda|, Narayanapet District, Telangana state, in favour of the Respondents No. 8 trl '1 5, until disposal of the partition suit i.e O.S.No - 41t2022 on the file of the Court of the District and Sessions Judge, Nagrayanapet, Telangana State, forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition |.A.NO:2 OF 2022 Between: K. Hari Prasad, S/o. Late Ambaji Rao, Age ; 63 years, AmUeOfar Nagar, Makthal, Narayahapet District, Telangana State' -Occ ; Agriculture, R/o' .....PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Prl Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, HYderabad.
2. The District collector, Narayanapet District, At Narayanapet, Telangana state 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narayanapet, Narayanapet District, Telangana State.
4. Tahasildar- cum- Joint sub- Registrar, Makthal Mandal, Narayanapet District, Telangana State.
5. Makthal Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Makthal, Narayanapet District, Telangana State.
6. The District Surveyor, Narayanapet District' At Narayanapet, Telangana State.
7. Ram Mohan Rao, S/o. Late Ambaji Rao, Age 68 years, Occ ; Agriculture, R:/o' ' ij. i'd. 5- 114, ai'puiiNigir, Makt'hal, Nara-yanap'et District, Telangana State'
8. M. Kurumurthy, S/o. Mala Sayanna, Age 38 years, Occ ;Agricultu*'^P-,o: H - tlo. t- 43, Maithangoud, Makthal, Narayanapet District, Telangana state' g.ChallaSripalReddy,S/o.AnanthReddy,Age42years,Occ;Business,R/o' - i. N". i- 7, Cnattairhpalle, Faroognaga'r, R-anga Reddy District, Telangana State- 509216.
10. K. Anil Kumar Goud, S/o. K. Anjaneyulu Goud, Age 31 years, Occ ; Software Engineer,R/o.H.No.3-99,Ma'inRoad,Manthagoud,Makthal'Narayanapet Diskict, Telangana State.
11.Adama Laxmipathi Reddy, S/o. Damodhar Reddy, Age 40 Vea1s, pgci,-. ,-. Business, R/o. H. No. 5- 81, Buchiguda, Faroognagar, Ranga Keooy urslrlcl' Telangana State.
12. K. Baskar Goud, S/o. K. Janardhan Goud, Age 40 years, Occ ; Business' R/o H. No.4- 133, Shabari Colony, Makthal, Narayanapet Dlstflct' lenngana State. 1 3. Edisi Babitha, S/o. Edigi Hanmanth Goud' Age 32.vg?rl: 9g" i 9ltllgt:,^Yo H. lio. 6- 196, Manthagoud, Makthal, Narayanapet District' Telangana state' 14 K Rajender Goud, S/o. Khajan Goud, Age 38 Lears'.O9: '-'191:ylt3.':f/o tto,S-'ta Manthagoud, Makihal. Narayanapet District' I era lgana stale' 15.A. Navakanth Reddy. Sio. A Narayana Reddy, Age 39 yea's'-Occ ;-^. - Aoriculture. R/o. H. iio. '1- 84, Adisatyavaram, Maganoor' Narayanapel District, Telangana State. H .....RESPONDENT:S/RESPONDENTS
16.The Directorate of Town and Country Planping,.Gover nment of Telanoana. ,"p uv iGiliiJ.ii;ofri;d aiidio-sh Floors, 640' utkoor- it6effiti;ifuit, opp : PTI Buildins, AC Guards, Hvderabad' Telangana - 500004. ..PROPO SIED RESPONDENT Petition Under section 151 CPC praying that in the circutnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ntay be pleased to impleadtheDirectorateofTownandCountryPlanning,GovernnentofTelangana respondent as 16th responden in l'A'112022 in at Hyderabad/ProPosed W.P.No.45385t2022 which is perrding before this W.P.No.4538512022 and Hon'ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioner : DR CHALLA SRINIVASA REDD'f Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 & 6 : AGP FOR REVI:NUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : SRI B.L.PRASUNNA Counsel for the Respondent No.8 : SRI M.SREEKANTH Counsel for the Respondent No.9 to 15 : SRI S.RAVI KUMAtt The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN Writ Petition No.45385 of2022 ORDER: Dr. Challa Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the petirioner would submit that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition and he has also moved Court Slip vide USR No.77986, dated3l.07.2C25 to the said effect. The same is placed on record. In view of the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions. if any, pending in this writ o_",i ,1n1shal! s!a1d cloled /ITRUE COPYI/ SD'.M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER ,. ,*o CCs to GP FoR REVENUE' High Court for the State of Telangana at ' 8#"61'?3 r*'*ii+nfrl[,ffiffii;''gittica'ie ro P u c] S One CC to SRI B'L'f 4 One CC to SRI M St 5. One CC to SRI S'Rl 6. Two CD CoPies SA BS hr' HIGH COURT DATED:0110812025 ORDER WP.No.45385 of 2022 -.'a:-a -^-, tHr s I,.l It- \ l '.) ,) t: t; \. -<- \r \ 25 tiou 26 c \ €5 PATCHF-O * z a A ,+ DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. t -dejl &'r*