High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana' Rep by rts Public Prosecutor' High Court for the '' sia-tJoi ierangana-' at Hvderabad' 2AmbatiJha":,.["-.*l"il]"."'3,y',!-,i:',?1i',1i?bllilliA?i,l133i1' E??lii?3";"1"ffi :ffi ','l?1"';iil"kil;rrvHv;erabad "'RespondenUDe-facto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS p'ayiln lhat in the circumstances stated in the Memorand'#"t t;'"os of Criminat Fetition the High Court may be oleased to quash tnt'p'J""iai"gs against t'e oetii'oners in C C' No' 734 of zoi3 onthe file of tr," rr#'"bi. i noiitioi,t Lunior bivit Judge-cum-Xll Additional J ud iciar Magistrate ot rir.i'bi""r.,'Hl"Jln"irrrrurujg irr D istrict at Kukatpaily. t.A. NO: 10F 2024 petition under section 52g of BNSS olavi.no that in the circumstances srated in the Memorand"*".,r"a1irias of Criminal Fetition, the High COUft-may be pteased to grant interim stay of alt further proceedings in C.C. No. 734 Of 2023 I :i..,?:,'5,:llfl::["iliiiilil,egli1fir,?lxfi[,j,t ,n,ona, Judicia, Masistrate l.A. NO:2 OF 2024 Betweenr "ffiflit"f ,:-l"a.,,rrr,i.",l# jru"$i,ir*":y ^_$i:,,*li,ffi 1. Ambati Veera Ven 5;fi; ig *;5,.rg*-#,g;]tr,,ifi *r,n_n : Hnih::ffi ff " 's:rff?"r,6ril3:H[]]??]t:i:':i:;l}xiifr [i#si^Hi:yr.:.:?13 i,Ti{;#lftt,;:'im--,ffi #:[tft#*$f:Ji,ti;i;+fr;, tlf.t:?F.t&:3:Y??fu.T:t0r".',0i,"",.-"""*:,i jl$[."?IJ:: jll Petition under Section -35g(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorand,,m.or o.r,no" Ii irr"#ril,r.rition, rhe uigh Cou,i.may B: fjiA::l :,:"JS, ffi *ru3.i jfilil'J'ffi : offen ces u/s +,ie _o- " "i,,," 0,, r.A. NO: 3 oF 2024 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS oraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Ground. bri.i".i petition, the High court may "l be preased to record the compromisu o"t*"un tnJpetitioners and the respondent No 21lpet*ioner No 1 in c_.c.No.734;ir;r;;;'ilJ rie or the Hon,bre r Additionar Junior civir Judge-cum-Xil Additionar .lro"i"r rr,nigltrate of First crass: Medchar- Malkajgiri District at Kukatpally. This petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon n"rring the argrments of Mr Mekara Venkatesham, Advocate for the Petitioners and the pubtic prosecutor on beharr or the Respondent No.1 and of sri V. Agni Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER 'a I{ON'BLE SMT. JUSTTCE JUVVADI SRIDBVI I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.15670 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos. I to 3 to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.734 of 2023 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Xll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kukatpally, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. It is submiued by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties lrave compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to cornpound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 27.12.2024, this Courl directed the parties along with their respcctive counseI to appear betbre the I I I I 2 Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Commiffee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 04.01 .2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. In view of the above, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 ate allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitionerVaccused Nos. I to 3 in C.C.No.734 of 2023 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cunr-Xll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kukatpally, hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shail stand closed. /TTRUE COPY'/ sd,- AS S . TIRUMALA DEVI NT REGISTRAR T T J CTION OFF ICER To, The r Additionar Junior civil Judge-cum-Xil Additionar Judicial Magistrate of The Station House Offrcer' Kukatpally Police Station Cyberabad District' FirstClassMedchal-MalkaigiriDistrictatKukatpally. 1 2 HYderabad [OUT]

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor' High Court for the State of Telangana at 4. One CC to Mr' Mekala Venkatesham' Advocate [OPUCI 5. One CC to Sri V' Agni Kumar' Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD CoPies a copv or Joint *"lo ot compromtse n ;;;-t ,) Kam/gh I \ H,GH COURT DATED:0 gt}lt2O2S ( t I i I ..'.r \ 1$ rriB 2[25 ,i c[spATcH0 ,,fr#:fl3f3:r,,* CRLP.No.15670 ot Z0Z4 19I[ t.As AND cRtMtNAL PETITION ANC Ar-r-OWED ^.4 0u(' %# i I I I I I IN THE HI6H COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANCANA AT HYDERABAD Between: CRL P.NO. oF 2024 Ambati Jhansi, Wo. Ambati Veera Venkata Satyanarayana, Aged about 34 years, Occ: Software employee, Vo. H. No. l5-21-14O/3/A, Flat No. 301, Bhanu Residency, Balaji Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. / ... Petitioner/Respondent No.2 And

1. Ambati Veera Venkata Satyanarayana , 5/o. Late Subba Rao, Aged about 39 years, Occ: vo. Flat No. 4805, VSR Celestial, Opp: HP Petrol pump, Gajularamaram, Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District. T5. N/o. l- Town, Vijayawada, AP.

2. Ambati Durga Prasanna Kumar, S/o. Late Subba Rao. Aged about 45 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, R/o. 3O1/3O5, Susheel Mentioni 5ainathapuram, near A5 Rao Nagar, Officers Colony. Hyderabad. N/o. I- Town, Vijayawada,AP.

3. Smt. Vara Laxmi Chandana, Wo. Ve.nu Prasad Rao, Aged about 42 years, Occ: Pvt. Teacher, R/o. Flat No. Ql, Devi Residency, Plot No.93,2"a Cross, Park No.4, RK Township, Bommasandra lndustrial estate. Anekar' Bangalore' o"t::.ti:loti:llnt,zputitioners i

4. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, No.rro 3/AccusedNo.r to 3 High Court for the state of Telanganh, at Hyder.abad. $* r I JOINT MEMo . :. Respondent/Respondent It is submitted that the petitioner and the respondent No.2 has resolved their issue and entered into an amicable settrement at the intervention of elders and weil-wishers of both of us and to this effect a separate compromise petition is also filed. Hence this Joint Memo. Hvderabad Date:1zf t>f 2ola 8l--n Respondent/de-facto Complainant 1 A oJdlrL'r . la'-\A 2

3. Petitioner/Accused No.l to 3 Counsel for th"&5-pondenr No. 2 counselfor petitionervqmNo. I to 3 I