The High Court · 2025

1 The State of Telangana, Rep.by Public Prosecutor High Court, High Court Building, Hyderabad.

2. tvlohd. Abdul Hadi Shaheri @ MA Hadi, S/o.tMohd. Abdul Hafeez Shaheri, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business, R/o 3-2-10, Near Post Office, Station Road, Tandur, Vikarabad Dist., TS Aadhar No. 4557 7007 5634 ... Respondents/De-facto Com plainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to CC No.294 of 2025 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Tandur, and quash the same against the Petitioners. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No.294 of 2025 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Tandur, pending disposal of the present Criminal Petition. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between :

1. Mohd. r\bdul Hadi Shaheri @ MA Hadi, S/o.ltllohd. Abdul HafeezShaheri, Ageo. q]?ort 60 years, occ. Business, R/o 3-2-10, Near post office, station Road, l-andur, Vikarabad Dist., TS Aadhar No. 4557 TOOT 5634. ...Respondents/De-fact Complainant in l.A No.2 and 3 of 2025 1. 9y"{ Kamal. Athar, s{o_sve{Ahmed, Aged about 60 years, occ. Business, 2. Khalid liaifullah, S/o.Abdul Ahad, Aged about 28 years, Occ. Business, R/o R/o Tandur, Vikarabad Dist., TS Tandur, Vikarabad Dist., TS

3. Mohamme{ Irnr.s, s/o.Mohammed rbrahim, Aged about 45 years, occ. Teacher, R/o Tandur, Vikarabad Dist., TS 4 rhe st:rte or reansa,,, #;XT;:,:fi::::llJ,lJl;il:ffit;f: Building, Hyderabad. ...Respondents in l.A No.2 and 3 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners and record the "orpro,iisu between petitioners anrJ respondent and quash the quash in CC No.2Sj+ of 2O2S on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Tandur by allowing the Criminal Petition, in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 3 OF :2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the ltlemorandum of Grounds of Criminat petition, the High Court may be pleased to record compromise and in CC No. 2g4 of 2025 on Ih" file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Tandur by allowing the Criminal petition, in the interest of justrce. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Gawhar Saleem Zeeshan, Advocate for the Petitioners in Crl.Petition & Respondent No.1 to 3 in lA Nos. 2 & 312025 and Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 in Crl. Petition & Respondent No.4 in lA Nos. 2 & 3t2O2S and Sri Mohd Adam for the Flespondent No.2 in Crl.Petition & Petitioner in lA Nos. 2 & 3t2}2s The Court macle the foHowing: COMMON ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICD J. SREENIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2o.25 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.lSO27 of 2O25 Date: O3.12.2O25. Between : Syed Kamal Athar and two others. ....Petitiorrt:rs/r^.ccused Nos. 1 to 3 AND The State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecul.or, High Court, High Court Building, Hyderabad, and another. ....Respondents COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 3 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.294 of 2025 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tandur.

2. Mr. Gawhar Saleem Zeeshan, Iearncd counsel for the petitioners, submitted that during the pendency of the present Criminal Petition, at the instance of the '*'ell rvishers, relatives and elders, the parties have settled the disputc and entered compromise and filed Joint Memo. Accordingly, respondent No.2 filed I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 to permit them to compromisc tlre offences and to record the compromise entered between them respectively. 2

3. This court uide order, dated 19.11 .2o2s, directed the parties i.e., the pctitioncrs and respondent No.2, to appear before the High court Lsgal Serviccs committee, I{yderabad, on or before 26.11.2o2s. In comcliance of the said order, the Secretary, High court Legal servicesr committee, has submitted report, dated 24.1L.2o2s, stating that thl: petitioners and respondent No.2 were duly identified with copies cf their Aadhar Cards. It is further stated that the parties have willfully and withoul any coercion entered into compromise.

4. I;:arned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 has not opposed the same.

5. Tire partics hcrein have filed Joint Memo along with I.A.No.3 of 2025. 'l'hc said Joirrt Memo and the report of the secretary, .I.elangana High court Legal Services committee, Hyderabad, are placed on record.

5. ln view clf thc said report and also in view of the compromise entered between the petitioners and respondent No.2 as urell as the subrnisr;ions made by the respective parties, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2o2s are allowed. consequcntly, the proceedings in c.c.No.294 of 2o2s on the lile of the Principal Junior civil Judge, Tandur, are hereby quasherl against thc pctitioners. 7 - A:cordingly, the criminal petition is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1o,0oo/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the High court Legal Services Committee and Rs.S,OOO/- (lRupces five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, by the petitioners within one week from today. Miscellaneous applications, pending if an',,, sl'uill stand closed. SD/. M.NAGAMANI TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Tandur, Vikarabad District. 2. The Station House Officer, Tandur Police Station, Vikarabad District. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana, at* Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri Gawhar Saleem Zeeshan, Advocate IOPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Mohd Adam, Advocate IOPUCI lU. 5. two CD Copies 'Svs/PSL (Along rvith a copy of Joint Memo) Note : Total Amount of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Gawhar Saleem Zeeshan, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 03.12.2025 as Rs.10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) to the "Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs.5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.146977 of 2025. HIGH COURT DATED fi3t12t2025 ORDER t.A NOS.;z AND 3 0F 2025 IN/AND CRLP.Nc,.1502t of 2025 o LJ t * T HES 11 fi/'r, 20fi e f.) * TCTIE ALLOWING THE CRLP AND I.A NO.2 AND 3 OF 2025 \h 11\ i' lt: JOINT MEMO FILEP BY BOTH THE PARTIES May it please your Lordship! It is submitted that on the information report submitted by the Respondent No. 2 vide FIR No. 75 of 2023, dated 10-04-2.023 before PS Tandur Town, for the alleged offences under section 406, 476; 4LB, 420, 463, 464, 468, r/w 34 Ipc, 156(3) cr.p.c., against the Petitioners and the police had laid the chargesheet in the said case vide GC No. 294 of zozs on the file of the Hon,ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Tandur. It is further submitted that wetl-wishers on both the sides have intervened in the matter and suggested to settte the dispute. In view of the suggestion made by weil-wishers, the Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 decided not to continue dispute and agreed for the settlement and the petitioners and Respondent No. 2 amicably decided to settle the issue. In those circumstances, the case vide and the potice had raid the chargesheet in the said case vide cc No. 294 of 2oz5 on the file of the Hon'ble principal Junior Civir Judge, at randur, is to be quashed. Hence this joint Memo. Date \3\{"r- Hyderabad lainant I I i I t ! i I I i i i i t I i ! i I I I I I I t I I ES # .{ g J '''Counsel l'or the mplainant I Resp ondent Petitioner No. L / Accused No. 1 wPetitioner No. 2 / Accused No. 2 Petitioner No. 3 I Accused No. 3 Counsel etitioners