Jletti lndrajith v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petiticn under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 6 to receive the application and release the individual service conrection to the petitioner, the plot No.404, in survey Nos. 1 1tg, 11tg, 11110 and 11111, Parr of survey No.11, admeasuring 412 sq. yards, situated at Khanamet ('/), Seritingampaily (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North. Plot No.40S; South. plot No.403; East. 30,Wide Road; West. Plot No.411. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THAKUR ROOPA STNGH Counsel for the Respondent No.l: Gp FOR ENERGY counsel for the Respondents Nos.2 to 6: sRt N.SREEDHAR REDDY, sc FoR TGSPDCL counsel for the Respondent No.7: sRt G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, sc FoR GHMC The Court nrade the following: ORDER .i I I L1.i; . .i# THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A UIRIT PETITION No.34732 OF 2025 OFDER: Petitioner seeks a direction to respondents No.2 to 6 to receive the aPPllce'ion form and release individual service connection to his property in plot No.4O4, in Survey Nos.11/8 II19, LL/L0 and 1Il7L, Part of Survey No.11, admeasuring 417 Sq.yards situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North: Plot No.405; South: Plot No.4O3; East: 30 Wide Road; West: Plot No.411., without being influenced b-y the instructions of the 7d' respondent - Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Ener$/ on behalf of Respondent No. 1, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL on behalf of Respondents 2 to 6 and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.7 - Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.

3. Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for petitioner submits that in somewhat similar circumstances, while dealing with Writ Petition No.2O121 of 2025, this Court by order dt.L4.O7.2025 directed the respondents authorities therein to release{he service connection, subject to the compliance of the 7 ;Ji*=--:- 2 statutory requiroments by the petitioner therein, and hence, requesterl this Court to pass similar order in the present writ i. Petition rrlso.

4. Recently, the Honble Supreme court in Rajendra Kumar Ba4iatga a. u.P. Aaq.s Eaam vikos parishadr, in the larger public interest, issued directions in addition to the direcrives issued i:r Re.' Directions in the matter of demolition of structures. Relevant for the purpose of this case are: "(irr) All the necessary service connections, such as, Electricify, water supply, sewerage connection, etc., shall be given by the service provider / Board to the btrildings <>nly after the production of the completion / cccupation certificate. (v, Even after issuance of completion certilicate, dt:viation / violation if any contrar5r to the planning pt:rmission brought to the notice of the authority inrmediate steps be taken by the said authority concerned, in accordance with law, against the brrilder / owner / occupant; and the official, who is r(:sponsible for issuance of wrongful completion I or:cupation certificate shall be proceeded d :partmentally forthwith. (ri) No permissio\ / licence to conductany business / trade must Ue gi.reii Uy any authorities irr"trairg local bodies of States /Union Territories in any ' zozq sCC online sC 3767 3 unauthorised building irrespective of it being residential or commercial building. (vii) The development must be in confo,'mity with the zonal plan land usage. Any modification to such zonal plan and usage mt:st be taken b1' strictll' folloWing Lire rules in place land in consideration of the larger public interest and the impact on the environment".

5. Since the prayer of petitioner is to receive the application form and release individual service connections, this Court without going into merits of the matter, directs the respondents to receive the applications of petitioner and release individual service connections to the subject property, subject to petitioner complying with the directions issued by the Honble Supreme Court in Rajendra Kurnar Bariatga's case (supra) and the statutory requirements prescribed by the local authorities.

6. The Writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs- 7 Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand SdI. A.J ANT ,,TRUE COPYI/ OFFICER To, t l!35..'i[:'Si.?B"ii:o'o*., :;.t =""* Department secretariat' ,S,.",n?T,?lSUfiH-#ilS?iJ8""!"r"Jii'l;hH'T3..ijf'l13::'T'T&5fS:' .s"*?:K'*;fi il3[th]?,,,1"3*ta:i:1.:rur:*4ff 'l#::erDistribution

4.TheDivisionalEnginBer'Operationfon."Ou''TGSPDCL'RangaReddy District' ,-;4 .ffi

5. The Asst. Divisional Engineer, operation Kondapur, TGSPDCL, Ranga Reddy District.

6. The Assistant Engineer, SE/OP/GHYD East AE Op Allapur, TGSPDC L, Rang:r Reddy District.

7. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilirgampally Zone, Ranga Reddy District.

8. One OC to SRI THAKUR ROOPA S|NGH, Advocate tOpUCl 9. One OC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDC{OPUCI 10.One OC to SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC tOpUCl 1 1. Two ocs to -q f-gR ENERGY, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] \ t

12.Two OD Copies PMI(/DAN w I j I ! I I I i I i : : i I i. ( I I i t I HIGH COURT DATED,'17 t11t2025 \ THE S t C) c 7 lrl1q 7l]6 * * ORDER WP.No.34732 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 15 -c* Vt- -6d"