✦ High Court of India · 17 Nov 2025

DR CONSTRUCTIONS v. l.TheStateofTelangana

Case Details High Court of India · 17 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
17 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,167 words

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 6 in not processing the application of the Petitioner to provide for 33 Domestic connections, total Domestic contract Load of 159000 watts, vide Reg.No. LTM256330143 to the petitioner, the Plot No. 180, in Survey Nos.11/30, ,1 1/22' 11124,11126,11t27and11/2g,admeasuring,l000sq.yards,situatedat Khanamet(V),serilingampally(M),RangaReddyDistrict,T'S''boundedby North- Plot No.179 South-Plot No.181 East- 50'wide Road west- Plot No.177.' as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to process the application and to release the individual service connection without being influenced by the instructions of the 7th respondent' ANO:1 OF2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 6 to process the application of the Petitioner to provide for 33 Domestic connections, total Domestic contract Load of '159000 watts,videReg.No.LTM25633ol43tothepetitioner,thePlotNo.lS0,inSurvey Nos.11/30, 11122, 11t24, 11126, 11t27 & 11/29, admeasuring 1000 sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M)' Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North-Plot No.179; South-Plot No.181; Eas!50' wide Road; west Plot No.'177. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 6: SRI N' SREEDHAR REDDY' S.C. FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY' S.C. FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A 1VRIT PETITION No.3481O OF 2O2S ORDER: , t Petitioner seeks a direction to respondents No.2 to z to process the ap'--lication of the petitioner to provide electricit5r connection to his property in plot No.180, in Survey Nos.lLl3o, ll/22, LLl24, lL/26, ttl2Z & 11 /29, admeasuring 1000 Square yards, situated at Khanamet village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District., T.s., bounded by North:plot No.179; South:Plot No.181; East:SO wide Road; west: plot No. !T2., without being influenced by the instructions of the 7ft respondent - Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. 2- Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energr on behalf of Respond.ent No.1, Sri N. sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing counsel for TGSp-IL on behalf of Respondents 2 to 6 and sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned standing counsel for Respondent No.7 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.

3. Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for petitioner submits that in somewhat similar circumstances, while deating with writ Petition No.20121 of 2o2s, this court by order dt.L4.o7.2025 directed the respondents authorities therein to release the service connection, subject to the compliance of the statutory requirements by the petitioner therein, and hence, requested this Court to pass similar order in the present Writ Petition also

4. Recently, the Honble Suprerae Court in Raiendra Kumar Barjatga a. tI.P. Aaas Euam Vikas Parisho,dl , in the larger public interest, issued directions in addition to the directives issued in Re: Directions in the matter of demolition o-f stntctures. Relevant for the purpose of this case are: "(iv) All the necessary service connections, such as, Electricity, water supply, sewerage connection, etc., shall be given by the service provider / Board to the buildings only after the production of the completion / occupation certificate. (v) Even after issuance of completion certificate, deviation / violation if any contrary to the planning permission brought to the notice of the authority immediate steps be taken by the said authority concerned, in accordance with law, against the builder / owner / occupant; and the official, who is responsible for issuance of wrongful completion I occupdtion certificate shall be proceeded departmentally forthwith. (vi) No permission / licence to conduct any business / trade must be given by any authorities including local bodies of States /Union Territories in any tz0z+ SCC Online 5C3767 : ' :- '-':{ 3 unauthorised building irrespective of it being residential or commercial building. (vii) The development must be in conformity with the zonal plan land usage. Any modification to such zonal plan and usage must be taken by strictly foilowing the rules in prace iand in consideration of the larger public interest and the impact on the environment". :

5. since the prayer of petitioner is to receive the application form and release individual service connections, this court without going into merits of the matter, directs the respondents to process the application of petitioner and release individual service connections to the subject property, subject to petitioner complying with the directions issued by the Honble Supreme court in Rajendra Kumqr BarJatga\ case (supra) and the statutory requirements prescribed by the local authorities. 6- The writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs.

7. consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ,,' ".-,-""-,.,. /TRUE COPY/ -/- SD/.B. REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6- SECTION 9FFICER To 1 . The Principal Secretary-P^gt1t91 Secretariat, HYderabad-500022 and Energy Department, State of Telangana'

2. The Chairman-cum-Managing. .Director' Telangana Distribution com"ia ny ffi it""d :Vid yuth Soud ha' Somaj State Southern Power iguda, HYderabad. i I t

3. The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

4. The Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur, TGSPDCL, Ranga Reddy District.

5. The Asst. Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur, TGSPDCL, Ranga Reddy District.

6. The Assistant Engineer, SE/OP/GHYD East AE OP Allapur, TGSPDCL, Ranga Reddy District. -.-e_.-'.- I

7. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy District.

8. One CC to SRI THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP for Energy, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI

10.One CC to SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDY, S.C. for TGSPDCL [OPUC] 1 1. One CC to SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, S.C. for GHMC [OPUCI

12. Two CD Copies MP BS \qr HIGH COURT DATED:1711112025 i: iAI.c H,IJ '3() tti L ?$25 G) * t <l: :.t:'- ORDER f WP.No.34810 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ,",eb o" Kr,

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments